S55 AMG, S65 AMG , S63 AMG (W220, W221) 2001 - 2013 (Two Generations)

Cayenne S or Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-03-2009, 12:31 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
transferred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
Originally Posted by chiphomme
No it isn't.
And if you're that cynical a turbo is just an S with forced induction with a much much higher msrp.
A fair point....

Mongoose- The GTS has different suspension, makes another 20bhp
Old 07-03-2009, 12:47 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Bigdot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
some
Originally Posted by transferred
A fair point....

Mongoose- The GTS has different suspension, makes another 20bhp
id still take the turbo
Old 07-03-2009, 02:10 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Max.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,681
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
E55
Turbo's are great! I drive my buddy's cayenne turbo once in awhile. The seats are very comfy has a plush interior and the turbos spool up quick.

A GTS with rims is the hawtness!! Especially for well south of 100k.
Old 07-03-2009, 11:16 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by RedMongoosE
id still take the turbo
Me too. Its out of my price range though.
Maybe next year I can grab one used for a bargain.
The new model is coming out and it looks really potent.


-Cayenne base will have a 310 horsepower V6 engine.60mph in 7.0 seconds. start at$47,000.
-Cayenne S will have a 418 horsepower V8 engine. 0-60mph in 6.0 seconds. start out at $60,000.
-Cayenne GTS will have a 460 horsepower V8 engine.0-60mph in 5.2 seconds. start out at $80,000.
-Cayenne Turbo will have a 533 horsepower V8 engine. 0-60mph in 4.8 seconds. start out at $110,000.
-Cayenne Turbo S will have a 580 horsepower V10 engine. 0-60mph in just 4.5 seconds. start out at $135,000.




http://streetcars.co.za/2009/03/2010...suv-spy-shots/

Last edited by chiphomme; 07-03-2009 at 12:03 PM.
Old 07-03-2009, 11:50 AM
  #30  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Originally Posted by chiphomme
Me too. Its out of my price range though.
Maybe next year I can grab one used for a bargain.
The new model is coming out and they look really potent.


-Cayenne base will have a 310 horsepower V6 engine.60mph in 7.0 seconds. start at$47,000.
-Cayenne S will have a 418 horsepower V8 engine. 0-60mph in 6.0 seconds. start out at $60,000.
-Cayenne GTS will have a 460 horsepower V8 engine.0-60mph in 5.2 seconds. start out at $80,000.
-Cayenne Turbo will have a 533 horsepower V8 engine. 0-60mph in 4.8 seconds. start out at $110,000.
-Cayenne Turbo S will have a 580 horsepower V10 engine. 0-60mph in just 4.5 seconds. start out at $135,000.




http://streetcars.co.za/2009/03/2010...suv-spy-shots/

So a 2009 CTS should be had for a deal seeing these improvements no???
Old 07-03-2009, 12:31 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
bzliteyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SF
Posts: 1,681
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
07 E63 06 CLK55 Cab 03 P-car C4S
these are all necessary changes.
imho, porsche has been very complacent on the horse power race. even in the 1990's, porsches were getting out-gunned by japanese cars.
now, the same thing is happening - lexus and infiniti's are both putting out over 300 hp's for 6 cylinders. to me, the V6 getting 300 hp is not that big a deal and was the minimum required to keep up.
Patrick
Old 07-03-2009, 02:21 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jim Brady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cave Creek, AZ and Newport Beach
Posts: 1,309
Received 86 Likes on 58 Posts
'22 G 63 AMG, '21 GLE 53 AMG, '20 NSX
I've had both. I'd take the S over the tt. Off boost lag in low speed in town driving is a big negitive in the tt. Lousey tire wear is another. I thought the ML 550 is far better than either.
Old 07-03-2009, 03:56 PM
  #33  
Member
 
garybc230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 SL500/2006 Porsche Cayenne S Titanium
I'm going to be that guy that has to disagree with the Turbo being the SUV to buy. I got a left over 06 S model Titanium and find that it's quite quick and handles better than a lot of cars out there. The price isn't so outrageous and the upkeep isn't as expensive as the turbo as well. The interior is the same except for the alcatrana(sp?) headliner. Oh and buy the way, the turbo gets 13mpg vs 16.5 spirited mpg.

Again drive them all back to back at your local dealer and call your insurance agent.

Good luck and happy hunting!
Old 07-06-2009, 11:04 AM
  #34  
Member
 
W220S430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 S430
ok i have to say this....why would you buy an overpriced VW Touareg!?!?!...sure the
Cayenne is a "Porsche" but underneath it IS a Touareg and i would go with a V10 TDI....listen the Treg looks better and i think it is better quality and the ride is better...this coming from experiance in both cars...but hell if you don't think like me go with the Turbo!
Old 07-06-2009, 12:42 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Here's a fun DR review of a bunch of superSUVs.
Go down to the Monsters Inc article

http://www.drivers-republic.com/features/

Last edited by chiphomme; 07-06-2009 at 12:44 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Cayenne S or Turbo?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.