S55 AMG, S65 AMG , S63 AMG (W220, W221) 2001 - 2013 (Two Generations)

W220 Bose vs W221 H/K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-24-2010, 06:16 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shanecarmaster1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with great fury.
W220 Bose vs W221 H/K

What are your opinions on how the systems compare? I very much enjoyed the w220 S65 Bose system, so how does the new H/K compare?
Old 03-25-2010, 10:52 AM
  #2  
Member
 
BVLDARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GL550
I think the Bose Sucks. Ok, maybe it doesnt suck, but it should have been WAAAAAAAY better for a $180k car. From my BMW experience, the H/K is much much better.

bang and olufsen in the a8 is by far the best stock system only lacking slightly in low end punch.

keep in mind, I consider myself a bit of an audio snob, so take my comments with that grain of salt...

Last edited by BVLDARI; 03-25-2010 at 03:05 PM.
Old 03-25-2010, 02:47 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shanecarmaster1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with great fury.
More specifically, what do you think the Bose lacks? What does the H/K lack? Are the downsides to the Bose made up in the H/K? If you wouldn't mind giving your opinion, it would be great. I see you like audio... I'm a Harman/Kardon prophet!
Old 03-25-2010, 03:05 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Corsa9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California USA
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 S55 ///AMG, 2007 E350
Having had Bose audio systems in several cars, I am not impressed with Bose. I am not an audiophile so it is difficult for me to explain, but Bose systems lack proper sound definition and depth, they are loud but not crisp to my ears.

HK systems are more refined and I hear it with more depth, definition and more dimension. Probably not audiophile vernacular but that's the best I can do.
Old 03-25-2010, 03:39 PM
  #5  
Member
 
BVLDARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GL550
agreed with corsa 9000.

Read this article, I felt this way before I saw the write up:

http://www.insideline.com/bmw/m6/200...gination_top_3

There was an aftermarket audio magazine that did an in depth review of the bang and olufsen system and I agreed with them 100% when I read it. It is nice to know that my opinion was validated. I will try to dig that up and post it.
Old 03-26-2010, 01:51 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Having had both Bose and HK I would take Bose any day.

Trust me I am SOUND 8.
Old 04-05-2010, 10:09 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
AMG1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Porsche, Aston Martin, Chevrolet
It's very difficult for me to say, however I think I enjoy the H/K more so. It sounds more developed and clear. However I do agree that the A8's B&O is fantastic. Also I believe MB should at least have an option for a high end system like a Burmester.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: W220 Bose vs W221 H/K



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.