S63/65/69?
03-28-2004, 05:06 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S63/65/69?
I read somewhere the capacities/hp and torque for all these cars but cannot remember where I saw it.
I want to know the capacities (litres), whether it is NA or BiTurb, how much BHP and the torque figures.
Cheers
I want to know the capacities (litres), whether it is NA or BiTurb, how much BHP and the torque figures.
Cheers
03-29-2004, 04:34 AM
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz A170 CDI
S63 6.3 N/A V8 with 500bhp and 600Nm
S65 6.0 Biturbo V12 with 612bhp and 1000nm
S69 6.9 BiTurbo V12 with "in excess of 675bhp and 1000Nm"
S65 6.0 Biturbo V12 with 612bhp and 1000nm
S69 6.9 BiTurbo V12 with "in excess of 675bhp and 1000Nm"
03-30-2004, 04:06 AM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
It will not be a 6.9 L motor
The 3 valve block can not go beyond about 6.3L with turbos and 6.7L without turbos. The block can not take the stress of being 6.9L with serious amounts of forced induction. The Brabus V12 is 6.3L so I see the AMG version being nothing more than 6.5L max (if that). This motor is not like the old quad cam motor which could go to over 7.4L with out any touble. But then again that motor did not use turbos.
I think the S69 name plate is just there to link the car back to the old 450SEL 6.9 form the 70's.
S65 is a 6.0L motor and the S600 is 5.5L so I doubt the S69 will be 6.9L.
I think the S69 name plate is just there to link the car back to the old 450SEL 6.9 form the 70's.
S65 is a 6.0L motor and the S600 is 5.5L so I doubt the S69 will be 6.9L.
