w211 E55 VS CLK550 with exhaust




My admin assistant drives a C280. The first time I met her a few years back, I asked her about her car. She said "I love the power, i think its a v8".
When I told her it was a v6, she was shocked.!
Not only that, some of them think just because they own a Mercedes, they think they're in the same class as all Mercedes owners.
One time I told a co-work that the Honda accord cost just couple thousands less.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
That is a complete lie. I raced a 2006 e 55 with my 2007 clk 550 from about 45 to about 100 and we were head to head. not to mention i beat him. A big differnce is that e 55 tops out somewhere in the 150's were as mine tops out at 140. these are all FACTS.
Last edited by TrueracerMB; Dec 11, 2009 at 03:43 PM. Reason: correction
http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/e55amg2003-1.htm
E55 test in sport auto 01/2003
Gewicht 1944 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,3 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,6 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,9 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 7,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 200 km/h 14,6 s
http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/...c2092007-1.htm
CLK550 (badged as 500 in Europe) test in ams Jahrbuch, 2008
Gewicht 1689 kg
0 - 80 km/h 4,0 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,5 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,3 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,5 s
0 - 160 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,2 s
0 - 200 km/h - s
45 mph to 100: OK, let's check this out: 45 mph is 72 km/h. Lowest speed they record is 80 km/h (about 50 mph), so we'll have to work with that. 100 mph is about 160 km/h.
So CLK550 takes 12.2 - 4.0 = 8.2 s to get from 50 - 100 mph, so it picks up 50 mph/8.2 s = 6.01 mph/s. E55 takes 9.8 - 3.3 = 6.5s, or 7.69 mph/s.
Which means that if you both punched it at 80 km/h (50 mph), here's how fast you should be going after each second in mph:
-- CLK550: E55:
1s: 56.01 57.69
2s: 62.02 65.38
3s: 68.03 73.07
4s: 74.04 80.76
5s: 80.05 88.45
6s: 86.06 96.14
7s: 92.07 103.83
8s: 98.08 111.52
Now, this is a bit off due to using a linear approximation for a nonlinear acceleration curve, which will give speed a bit high as it's using an average, while acceleration drops off as speed increases. Let's double check vs actual:
CLK550 took 8.2 s to get from 80-160 km/h.
E55 is going 80 km/h after 3.3 s .
So we need to know how fast the E55 would be going when you're at 100 mph, so take the time at which it hit 80 km/h (50 mph) from above, which is 3.3 sec, and add the time it took the CLK550 to go from 50-100 mph (8.2 sec) to the starting time (3.3s): 3.3 + 8.2 = 11.5 s.
Now we need to figure out the speed the E55 would be doing after 11.5 s.
From above, E55 does:
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 12,2 s
Using an average over this narrower range will give more accurate results. It takes 2.4 s to get from 160-180, or 20 km/h / 2.4s = 8.33333 km/h/s. At 11.5 s, it's gone for 1.7 seconds from 9.8, so it should be going 160 km/h + 1.7 s*8.3333km/h/s = 174.16666 km/h, or 108.22 mph.
Also, just look at the standing start numbers: it took the CLK550 12.2 sec to hit 160 km/h (100 mph), while the E55 hit 180 km/h (111.86 mph) in the same amount of time. That's a huge difference.
So, there you have it. No matter how you slice it, in the time it takes you to get from 50-100, he's accelerated from 50-108+, probably more like 110+.
He'd be walking you pretty good at that point, no way you'd be door to door unless something's seriously wrong. The numbers just don't back this up, not even close.
Last edited by Improviz; Dec 12, 2009 at 08:49 PM.
I know this guy who has a E63 which is close in performance as the 211 E55. We did a 2nd gear roll with my Clk55,he just kept pulling away. Just look at the trap speed difference between the two. Mine traps around 109 same as the Clk550.
It'll be fun!
http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/e55amg2003-1.htm
E55 test in sport auto 01/2003
Gewicht 1944 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,3 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,6 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,9 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 7,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 200 km/h 14,6 s
http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/...c2092007-1.htm
CLK550 (badged as 500 in Europe) test in ams Jahrbuch, 2008
Gewicht 1689 kg
0 - 80 km/h 4,0 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,5 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,3 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,5 s
0 - 160 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,2 s
0 - 200 km/h - s
45 mph to 100: OK, let's check this out: 45 mph is 72 km/h. Lowest speed they record is 80 km/h (about 50 mph), so we'll have to work with that. 100 mph is about 160 km/h.
So CLK550 takes 12.2 - 4.0 = 8.2 s to get from 50 - 100 mph, so it picks up 50 mph/8.2 s = 6.01 mph/s. E55 takes 9.8 - 3.3 = 6.5s, or 7.69 mph/s.
Which means that if you both punched it at 80 km/h (50 mph), here's how fast you should be going after each second in mph:
-- CLK550: E55:
1s: 56.01 57.69
2s: 62.02 65.38
3s: 68.03 73.07
4s: 74.04 80.76
5s: 80.05 88.45
6s: 86.06 96.14
7s: 92.07 103.83
8s: 98.08 111.52
Now, this is a bit off due to using a linear approximation for a nonlinear acceleration curve, which will give speed a bit high as it's using an average, while acceleration drops off as speed increases. Let's double check vs actual:
CLK550 took 8.2 s to get from 80-160 km/h.
E55 is going 80 km/h after 3.3 s .
So we need to know how fast the E55 would be going when you're at 100 mph, so take the time at which it hit 80 km/h (50 mph) from above, which is 3.3 sec, and add the time it took the CLK550 to go from 50-100 mph (8.2 sec) to the starting time (3.3s): 3.3 + 8.2 = 11.5 s.
Now we need to figure out the speed the E55 would be doing after 11.5 s.
From above, E55 does:
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 12,2 s
Using an average over this narrower range will give more accurate results. It takes 2.4 s to get from 160-180, or 20 km/h / 2.4s = 8.33333 km/h/s. At 11.5 s, it's gone for 1.7 seconds from 9.8, so it should be going 160 km/h + 1.7 s*8.3333km/h/s = 174.16666 km/h, or 108.22 mph.
Also, just look at the standing start numbers: it took the CLK550 12.2 sec to hit 160 km/h (100 mph), while the E55 hit 180 km/h (111.86 mph) in the same amount of time. That's a huge difference.
So, there you have it. No matter how you slice it, in the time it takes you to get from 50-100, he's accelerated from 50-108+, probably more like 110+.
He'd be walking you pretty good at that point, no way you'd be door to door unless something's seriously wrong. The numbers just don't back this up, not even close.

http://www.youtube.com/t/yt_handbook_produce




