SL-Class (R129) 1990-2002: SL 280, SL 300, SL 320, SL 500, SL 600, SL 60 AMG

SL/R129: AutoWeek On-line 2003 SL500 Review...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-14-2001, 03:05 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Richard / E320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Bay Area, California
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2001 E320
AutoWeek On-line 2003 SL500 Review...

AutoWeek On-line 2003 SL500 Review...

http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content...._code=00197491
Old 12-14-2001, 03:33 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
hmrdwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Center of Universe
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK55, Mini S
The guy that wrote that review sounds like a moron. He compares it to the Z8 that costs $40k more??? Idiot. Never once does he mention the Jag in the same context. Since when have SL buyers compared shope Porsche or Vette as a choice...well, maybe a Tiptronic Porsche, but come on. His revelation...It's not a Porsche...wow a genius. Why do they let jerks like this write car reviews when they cannot put it into the proper context.

Last edited by hmrdwn; 12-14-2001 at 03:40 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R129: AutoWeek On-line 2003 SL500 Review...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 AM.