





SL/R129: Emotional Quandry...
The only time I ever suffer buyer's remorse is when I see another R129 with a 500 or 600 on the back - I am looking at a silver 1994 SL500 (140,000 km) and a silver 1996 SL600 (96,000 km). The 600 is 25% more expensive than the 500 but the 500 has approx 40,000 more kms than the 600.
I need assistance because I don't want to be sitting in the 500 hankering after the 600.
I have picked up from previous threads that the 600 is significantly more expensive to run & maintain. It will be in daily use.
I am not a wealthy man but I am passionate about these cars...
Any comments regarding the specific model years and what to look out for/avoid would be greatly appreciated...
Last edited by antonofafrica; Jan 20, 2009 at 08:22 AM. Reason: Need more specific info
On to the remaining two... are you a brisk driver or satisfied with the performance of your 320? As for interior equipment, do you want more leather in the car (SL600)? Beside maintenance cost, those are two other options you should consider as well. If you don't want the performance and can deal with less leather appointment, just stick with the 320.
As for the S2000... I have no input so I didn't consider it with my post.
Maybe buying some new mags and a new hood would provide the change I need, while retaining 'the devil I know'.
Can anyone out there comment on whether a tan soft top suits a white SL with grey leather??? If anyone has a picture?
PS: The S2000 is no substitute for an SL... Exciting to drive, but nowhere near the prestige and solidity.







