SL/R230: Performance Test SL600 (VIDEO)
i've done it at 100.. and it isn't the most pleasurable feeling...
It would be great fun to race off the line and witness the inevitable thrashing in person.
hence, a = v/t
For the R230 SL600 at 100 mph (which = 146.7 feet per second), we have
a = 146.7 fps/10 seconds = 14.67 ft/sec. squared
Now, distance (d) = a/2 x t squared
For the SL600, d at 100 mph = 14.67/2 x 10 squared = 733 feet
For the R129, a at 82 mph = 120 fps/10 sec = 12 ft/sec. squared
d at 82 mph = 12/2 x 10 squared = 600 feet
The R230 SL600 is (733 - 600) feet ahead of the R129 at the end of 10 seconds = 133 feet
I think! My BS in Physics was 37 years ago.
I am impressed!
Neither an M3 cab nor an F355 cab will hit 60 in 4.5. M3 cabs are in the low 5's, and the F355 Spyders were tested from 4.9 (Motor Trend) to 5.3 (Road & Track) 0-60.
Remember, they do acceleration runs on a very high traction surface and correct the results for temperature and altitude. Plus, all the magazines don't start timing the run until the car has gone 12 inches. Just like the NHRA.
Still that's amazing for a car that they weighed at 4501 pounds when full of fluids.
But that Z06, yeah, that's a beast! Insane car...I drove a C6 the other day, and came away very impressed...handles fantastically, and yet the ride (and this was a Z51, mind you) is excellent, better than my car I'm sad to say.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




