SL-Class (R230) 2003 -- 2012: Discussion on the SL500, SL550, SL600

SL/R230: Is this a mistake...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 18, 2005 | 06:12 AM
  #1  
NeilC123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Midlands, England
SLK 230
Is this a mistake...

I was reading on a website about mercedes increasing their prices and guess what i found:

"The entry-level SLK roadster, the 200, is now £500 more expensive increasing to £28,040. Its bigger brother, the SL, now costs between £100 and £1760 more, depending on whether you buy the cheapest £47,600 SL280 or the top-of-the-range £144,500 SL65 AMG."

I didn't realise there was a SL280 out there?

Here is the website by the way:
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 06:34 AM
  #2  
NeilC123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Midlands, England
SLK 230
Website.

Forgot to post the website:

http://www.whatcar.co.uk/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=215089
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #3  
Scotsman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
2004 SL500, 2007 R350 Sport
Nup, never heard of it. Prices don't tie up so don't think it's a typo as the SLK280 is £30,975. Strange.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #4  
So Cal Sam's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: El Segundo, CA
2006 SL 500
Unfoetunate news but not surprising. I've been holding off on ordering a 2006 SL 500 until the prices are available - not available as of yesterday here in Southern California.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.