SL/R230: Decisions
In 2004 my SL55 was also good.
My 2006 SL600 was a disaster and I dropped it at 2750 miles and lost over $35,000 with taxes.
There is someone on this forum that had to go through 3 brand new SL500's in order to get a good one.
It is an odds game. My guess is that getting a good one is probably over 50/50 but how much over I would not venture to say.
For me, I have given up on Mercedes and will NEVER buy another one, at least not in the foreseeable future.
There are however many on this forum that have had positive experiences.
The other day I test drove a Jaguar XK convertible and was a little disappointed. The jag was designed for a small person. My head was barley touching the roof and the rear view mirror blocks my view on the right side.
If you do decide to go for it make sure you are permitted to give the car a very long and thorough test drive local/highway while testing every component no matter how minor or major. Of course I realize problems can/will emerge later on but if the car has quite a few issues when new it's not a good sign of things to come.
I've owned many, many new cars mostly European (German and Italian), some have been great while others have been no so great or even worse. The problem I've experienced with MB is they are reluctant to give the dealers the OK to repair what really should have been repaired in the first place in turn making the dealer look bad and frustrating the customer. I have had dealers go the extra mile and always shown my appreciation with years of loyalty. Also MB seems to let new cars be delivered to the dealers right from the factory with well known TSB's being issued months before, this really helped torpedo MB's initial quality ratings.
The SL is a great looking car and you'd hope by now they've got it right.
Last edited by RJC; Oct 29, 2005 at 10:44 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
How picky are you? Once you spend upwards of $100K for a car, I know that my expectations change. I expect perfection and perhaps no car can deliver on that.
There is no questions that elements of the SL are incredible- the V12 engine for example, the exhaust note on the SL55, the design of the retractable top.
Still there are other examples of things that drove me mad- those SBC brakes are the best example with their noises and squeals and odd feel. All four of my cars had noises associated with the top that required attention. The 7 Speed tranny in my 2004 SL500 was very clunky when cold (subsequent software updates may have cured this). The stereo in my 2005 SL600 was truly embarrassing- it was downgraded from my 2004 car.
I think I will wait for the next generation SL with conventional brakes.
The stereo in my 2005 SL600 was truly embarrassing- it was downgraded from my 2004 car.
I too am disappointed in the quality of my 2005 SL sound system. This is one of the very few things I have been disappointed in with my SL. The sound in my 2000 Pontiac Bonneville SSEI is clearly better.
In the same R/T issue I also saw a rendering of the new BMW M1 cabriolet...
Last edited by RJC; Oct 30, 2005 at 07:56 PM.
The other day I test drove a Jaguar XK convertible and was a little disappointed. The jag was designed for a small person. My head was barley touching the roof and the rear view mirror blocks my view on the right side.
I have a 1997 Toyota and have absolutely NO issues on a car that costs a third of your MB and currently has 127K miles.
Last edited by StapleGun; Oct 30, 2005 at 07:58 PM.
That is a common error on new cars. I think the telaid is not activated.
I too am disappointed in the quality of my 2005 SL sound system. This is one of the very few things I have been disappointed in with my SL. The sound in my 2000 Pontiac Bonneville SSEI is clearly better.
If you compare the settings in the 2004 vs the 2005 you will see the software has been changed.
IMHO, the sound system is inferior to the SL sound system of the previous year.






