SL/R230: ABC suspension, command module, rooftop assembly
I think the point was that this isn't really a car that can be bought on the cheap. The first payment (the purchase price) depends on what price you pay the dealer, but whatever that first payment is, you will continue to pay down the line the same costs that the very first owner would've paid. If you're unwilling to pay the repair costs at this point, wait until you are comfortable doing so.
It's like any other car -- take care of the maintenance and it will largely take care of you, but after a couple hundred thousand miles any car will probably need a new transmission, for example, no matter how gentle you are on it over those miles. If you accept that it is possible you'll have to pay for the struts, or the COMAND module, or roof components, then you'll be able to prepare for it, rather than hoping that babying it will somehow keep this from happening.
I don't think anyone here wants to keep you from the car -- I think we're just worried that we've heard a lot of hoping that reality won't end up on your doorstep, and we don't like seeing people's high expectations get dashed. You're asking us for advice on how to cut corners on a car whose corners can't really be cut.
Last edited by mlandis; Feb 22, 2009 at 02:20 AM.
The main difference I see between our stories is that I was willing to wait until I was able to buy the car on the car's terms (in terms of cost of ownership). It sounds like you are trying the buy the car on your terms. What if the car refuses to meet you halfway? Are you ready to deal with that?
Last edited by mlandis; Feb 22, 2009 at 02:46 AM.
I think that fits you perfectly.
You will be paying "repair" cost on the car, in some form or fashion. Flat tires, oil changes, occasional scrapes and bumps on bumpers, door dings, broken suspension, cigarette burns on the interior, drink spills, running your car into rodents, meteorites slamming into your car, etc.
Again, what the last six months have told us. Cars are just toys. Enjoy it and don't worry about the value.
Why have a Corvette when you're doing Corolla speeds?I exercise my cars regularly and they typically reward me with years of great running -- as long as I do the proper maintenance. That said, I do have funds stashed for repairs on the SL, just in case!
Rook
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Go get your SL500 and get an extended warranty. Pick one up with 50k miles and get a 5/60 warranty. You'll be good till 110k miles and 2014. You probably won't have the car that long.
You cannot get the car and then not use it, that is a total waste of money. If the top broker while it was closed would you seriously not get it fixed? You'd be happy with a SL500 coupe?
Last edited by Bam Bam; Feb 24, 2009 at 03:52 AM.
Granted, if the roof broke in the up position, you could delay getting it fixed. Well, some people could -- I would not be able to stand it. Convertible hard-top FTW!

Rook
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessi...lsive_disorder
I guess like anyone on the topic has already said. You buy such cars to enjoy them. If repairs and cost of ownership is causing you to lose sleep,then, honestly this may not be the car for you. Be wise and get a comprehensive warranty. If you cant afford a warranty, you will likely need deep pockets for expenses down the line.
Last edited by djamer; Feb 24, 2009 at 03:15 PM.
Good thing I'm not planning to have kids or retire...
Chrysler has a hardtop convertible called the sebring. If by 2019 that thing looks a lot better and starts to have the look of the R230 then I wouldnt mine getting one of those. Buts its a big if.
http://www.chrysler.com/en/2009/sebring_convertible/
Last edited by Bam Bam; Feb 25, 2009 at 03:13 AM.
Rook
I literally drove all these cars and only found one that even dared to compete with the SL:
- 2008 Mazda Miata MX-5, nice but small. No real storage space.
- 2009 Crysler Sebring hardtop convertible, utter crap, no power, bad build quality, soul-sucking horribleness.
- 2008 Mustang, both the V6 and the GT (V8), nice power but bad build quality. The ride quality also strangely sucked quite badly. The GT was especially skittish in turns even with no power on. Top operation required manual intervention (unlock roof latches) and the interior design leaves something to be desired. For 300hp, there's a lot of theatre (noise and rumble) but no real go.
- 2009 Saturn Sky Red Line, really really fun and the ride quality is nice and sporty. Absolutely no storage space and the top operation is completely manual -- and a complete pain in the a$$. This would be a really nice fun sunny-day garage car if you can pick one up on the cheap.
- 2007 Jaguar XK, a really really nice car. Unfortunately for me, they are holding their value quite well and I was going to have to wait until I could afford one sometime much later in 2009. My first choice was the Jag until I test drove the SL this past October (2008). I do find that the hard top is much better than any soft top out there. Obviously, this one is a definite competitor to the SL. At 300hp though, they are behind compared to the SL550 it competes with.
Rook
Rook[/QUOTE]
But if its less expensive to buy, they will have to sell volume to make up for the R&D costs. Also remember that the SL is the top of the line roadster that MB carries. If it didnt look that great, people would just buy the SLK which is 1/2 the price.


