SL/R230: SL 500 has been garaged for 4 years
The car is a 2003 SL500 with AMG kit on it.
The seller says that the central locking pump has failed, glove box is stuck closed, but of more concern, he says the front left suspension strut needs replacing. Looking at the photos, it is certainly sitting very low on that corner whilst it's on the back of a recovery truck.
I have asked him who diagnosed it as strut failure as, to my knowledge, unless there is an actual fluid leak on the strut, it wouldn't cause the corner to sag. The valves should lock any fluid into the strut if it detects a pressure loss.
My main concern is that he says that the car has just sat in his garage since this failure, four years ago.
That's a long time to leave a hydraulic system inactive and I'm concerned it could end up needing all sorts of o-rings and seals replacing due to degradation.
I talked him down to 9000€ ($11,000 - £7900) for the car, and book price for this particular model in France is €16,000 ($19,660 - £14,038)
Is it worth a shot, or should I walk away?
a) He Let the PSE system fail and decide not to fix it, even though it's one of the issues on the R230 that's lower on the pain scale for the pocketbook (and pretty easy to DIY)
b) He Let an ABC system failure take the car out of commission for 4 years. You have no way of knowing if the issue is simply the shock, or if the valve body is toast. Also, the high pressure hoses have been sitting unused for 4 years, never a good thing for hydraulic systems.
I'm personally never comfortable buying from those whose answer to maintenance and upkeep is to simply ignore the problem, especially on a vehicle like the R230 that has so many potential expensive headaches. I also would NEVER consider an R230 that I couldn't test drive. So my personal suggestion is as follows:
Order of progression:
1) Lace up the Nikes nice and tight.
2) Get in a three point stance to maximise acceleration potential.
3) Launch your self in any direction away from this deal with maximum ferocity.
If you would be getting the car at an $8000 discount to what would otherwise be its market value, then I would buy it.
Everything worth a shot. On the other hand, the r129 doesn't have even half of the complicated systems the r230 has. It is night and day. I would not go for it unless it's running and I can see better what are the problems.
Example: there is one sl500 r230 for sale in my city with burnt wires in the trunk/roof area. The guy is asking 8k. According to him everything works besides the roof. That's a deal I would consider, even If it's only about 7k below other cars on sale and it's electrical.
https://sacramento.craigslist.org/ct...548041392.html
But again, to each his own

Ghostty
Last edited by Ghostty; Apr 21, 2018 at 01:00 PM.
At any rate, whether the two models are dissimilar or not is immaterial to the point I was making. From this thread one might infer that any vehicle that has sat for a few years is going to have several fundamental problems. My 129 is an example how this needn't be the case.
If it weren't for the salvage title I'd probably purchase the Fresno car myself and have it shipped to Atlanta.
But what a beauty if you got it back up and running. An SL like that is on my bucket list, would have to really engage my rational brain to resist the temptation.






