SL-Class (R231) 2013 on: Discussion on the SL550

SL/R231: SL63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-06-2012, 12:05 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
erichen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
04 SL 500, 09 R350, 09 E63, 2010 Prius
SL63

any thread on the new R231 SL63? I saw one in Vegas over the weekend, white with red interior... gotta say, gorgeous! Looks way better than the SL550... Wow!
Old 08-09-2012, 02:12 PM
  #2  
Member
 
amgrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BAY AREA, CA
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
13 SL63
Yeah I am unsure why there isn't already a R231 AMG forum. I thought typically forums for new cars are up and running before the car is even available?

Anybody know how to get a forum created or who needs to be sent a note?
Old 08-30-2012, 08:10 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
RENNTECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS63
AMG

SPECIAL ORDER
Attached Thumbnails SL63-2012-08-30-07.14.47.jpg   SL63-2012-08-30-07.14.56.jpg   SL63-2012-08-30-07.15.07.jpg   SL63-2012-08-30-07.15.15.jpg   SL63-2012-08-30-07.15.34.jpg  

SL63-2012-08-30-07.15.42.jpg  
Old 08-30-2012, 08:10 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
RENNTECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS63
.
Attached Thumbnails SL63-2012-08-30-07.15.48.jpg  
Old 12-14-2021, 07:31 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Litho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 SL65, 2015 S63, 2019 Trackhawk, 2012 RR SC
https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-...ngId=618746555


2015 SL65 Blk/Blk 6,900 miles
Old 12-15-2021, 09:09 PM
  #6  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,056
Received 3,241 Likes on 2,018 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by Litho
Looks like at least like a $80k premium based on what I remember these going for
Old 12-15-2021, 09:52 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rmorin49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 1,379
Received 423 Likes on 313 Posts
2015 SL400; 2019 X5M40i
Is it true that these "real" AMG cars have a very sporty, should I say firm ride, that many traditional SL owners would find unsatisfactory?
The following users liked this post:
Streamliner (12-16-2021)
Old 12-16-2021, 09:47 AM
  #8  
Super Moderator

 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 10,056
Received 3,241 Likes on 2,018 Posts
AMG GTC Roadster, E63s Ed.1, M8 Comp. Coupe
Originally Posted by rmorin49
Is it true that these "real" AMG cars have a very sporty, should I say firm ride, that many traditional SL owners would find unsatisfactory?
People in general have very different preferences when driving.
I know many would stay in Comfort or even Curve mode when available but others (myself included) would switch to Sport or Sport+ mode as soon as getting in the car.

AMG buyers expect a sportier car and people will be split paying more for luxury upgrades rather than performance.

The following users liked this post:
Streamliner (12-16-2021)
Old 12-16-2021, 11:17 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Streamliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corona Del Mar, CA
Posts: 7,297
Received 3,590 Likes on 2,053 Posts
2020 S560 Sedan, 2019 SL450, 2019 E450 Luxury Trim Wagon, '24 BMW I7 on order...
Before I took delivery of my 2019 SL450, I fell in love with the looks of this 2017 SL65 AMG. It was for sale on the east coast and I’m in Southern California. I came close to buying it, but Wolfman convinced me to find a local one to test drive first. So, I went down to San Diego and drove a 2018 that was for sale. I had it set to “comfort” and within two blocks of driving, I absolutely knew that I would hate owning the car. The beast rode very harshly and jarring. In all fairness, I do not know if that car had the optional sport suspension, but it did not have the ceramic brakes, so I doubt it. Anyway, my little SL450 with ABC showed up a few weeks later and I’ve been thrilled with the ride, handling AND the acceleration ever since.
Thanks again Wolf!



The following users liked this post:
Wolfman (12-16-2021)
Old 12-16-2021, 02:36 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
emilner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Huntington NY
Posts: 1,935
Received 344 Likes on 215 Posts
S560
Originally Posted by rmorin49
Is it true that these "real" AMG cars have a very sporty, should I say firm ride, that many traditional SL owners would find unsatisfactory?
It is commonly said (and I agree with it) that an SL63 in comfort mode is firmer than a 450/550 in sport mode. I had a 2013 SL63 and could only muster one year of driving it before it went up for sale, it was just too jarring for me....
Old 12-16-2021, 06:10 PM
  #11  
Member
 
ram_g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 140
Received 68 Likes on 47 Posts
R231 SL63 & R129 SL500
I don’t disagree with any of the previous posts basically stating “different strokes for different folks”. I’ve only briefly driven any R231 SL other than my SL63, which if anything I find a bit on the soft side relative to my other cars and my perception of what a nice ride is. I’m one of those as Wolfman posts who switches the ride to “AMG” a.k.a. Sport pretty much all the time.
Old 12-13-2022, 09:48 AM
  #12  
Member
 
jmattioni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 222
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
2014 SL65 AMG, 2018 S560
I owned a 2013 SL550 for a few years. It had 18" wheels with replacement tires that were not run flats and had a comfortable ride. At the time we also test drove another 2013, also w/o ABC, but with 19" wheels and (I think) run flats. The ride was noticeably less comfortable. We test drove both cars in Comfort mode for comparison.

I now recently purchased a 2014 SL65 AMG, which has 19" front and 20" rear wheels w/o run-flats. The AMG variants all have ABC as standard. I was pleased to note that the ABC does make the ride with larger wheels more tolerable. It's definitely a firmer ride than our old SL550, but perfectly acceptable. The AMG control setup for ABC is different from the base models with that option. The dial changes the mode C, S, S+, etc., but there's a separate button you press to firm up the suspension. I will typically switch to S mode when I start the car (which also disables ECO), but I don't push the suspension button. In that setup the car rides fairly well considering the size of the wheels.

I think wheel size and your choice of tires is a bigger factor for ride comfort. In my view, ABC makes the larger wheels more tolerable in addition to its unique ability to keep the car level in a turn.
The following 2 users liked this post by jmattioni:
crconsulting (12-13-2022), ram_g (12-13-2022)
Old 12-13-2022, 06:06 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
Dr. Manhattan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Nothern Georgia, U.S.A.
Posts: 547
Received 163 Likes on 113 Posts
'17 SL450, '17 Volt, '17 Malibu Hybrid, '96 Corvette GS coupe
There are R231 AMGs and then there are R231 AMGs. The standard AMG ABC SL suspension is a bit firmer than the optional ABC in "lesser" SLs. However, the optional, performance ABC in AMG SLs is a whole different ball game. In this case, "performance" actually translates to "punishing / intended for track use". If your AMG SL had this option, you'd be well aware of it, as even on the softest setting it's been known to rattle fillings loose . Members with this option over on the AMG SL forum have had spouses flat out refuse to ride in cars so equipped. A serious option, indeed. I've always been curious why they even offered such an option. I mean, who buys an SL...even an AMG SL, for a track-only car? If that's what I was going to do with a car in that price range, I'd be looking at 911s or C8s. An SL isn't about crushing lap times, it's about crushing continents. Obviously, JMO / YMMV...
The following users liked this post:
Streamliner (12-13-2022)
Old 12-13-2022, 06:46 PM
  #14  
Member
 
ram_g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 140
Received 68 Likes on 47 Posts
R231 SL63 & R129 SL500
Originally Posted by Dr. Manhattan
There are R231 AMGs and then there are R231 AMGs. The standard AMG ABC SL suspension is a bit firmer than the optional ABC in "lesser" SLs. However, the optional, performance ABC in AMG SLs is a whole different ball game. In this case, "performance" actually translates to "punishing / intended for track use". If your AMG SL had this option, you'd be well aware of it, as even on the softest setting it's been known to rattle fillings loose . Members with this option over on the AMG SL forum have had spouses flat out refuse to ride in cars so equipped. A serious option, indeed. I've always been curious why they even offered such an option. I mean, who buys an SL...even an AMG SL, for a track-only car? If that's what I was going to do with a car in that price range, I'd be looking at 911s or C8s. An SL isn't about crushing lap times, it's about crushing continents. Obviously, JMO / YMMV...
I’m not really sure this is correct. See the equipment list and options for the R231 SL63 here > https://media.mbusa.com/releases/rel...-2013-sl63-amg - there is no mention of a stiffer “performance ABC”.

My SL63 has the P30 AMG performance pack and as I posted previously in this thread, I like and routinely use the Sport setting (on both the throttle and the suspension). But as the link suggests, there is no difference vis-a-vis the suspension with P30.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R231: SL63



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.