SL/R231: 2022 SL reveal













The V6 out of the SL450 should not remained in the car as long as it did. The only reason was the re-tooling costs due to low production volume. That engine has been kicked out of other models years ago as its outdated (launched in 2010). It even stayed in the S-Class in the US while it was pulled anywhere else for reasons unknown.
The new SL is AMG only so the engine choices are different. A 4 banger is unattractive for me but at least it is a new engine design and the highest performance 4 cylinder engine in the world. Great rating so far...
We will stay with a V8 until we go electric
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




The V6 out of the SL450 should not remained in the car as long as it did. The only reason was the re-tooling costs due to low production volume. That engine has been kicked out of other models years ago as its outdated (launched in 2010). It even stayed in the S-Class in the US while it was pulled anywhere else for reasons unknown.
The new SL is AMG only so the engine choices are different. A 4 banger is unattractive for me but at least it is a new engine design and the highest performance 4 cylinder engine in the world. Great rating so far...
We will stay with a V8 until we go electric

Me too. Plan to trade my '15 for a '19 or '20 SL550 in a couple years.




The V6 out of the SL450 should not remained in the car as long as it did. The only reason was the re-tooling costs due to low production volume. That engine has been kicked out of other models years ago as its outdated (launched in 2010). It even stayed in the S-Class in the US while it was pulled anywhere else for reasons unknown.









According to Wikipedia, the 60 degree angle has similarities with the Chrysler pentastar engine but I think this is presumptuous.
There have been tons of engines with that layout decades earlier.
It is a good and reliable engine but technically old school and less efficient compared to anything else that Mercedes has in its lineup.
Whats next? 157 V8 TT engine is the same as 278 V8 TT because it was derived from it? Of course not!
However, I stand by the rest (not directed at anyone specific): if 276 3.5 NA is the "same base engine" as 276 3.0 TT, then so are 278 and 157. To me 278 and 157 are totally different (roots not withstanding) and so are 3.5NA and 3.0TT (even if both have 276 designation).




However, I stand by the rest (not directed at anyone specific): if 276 3.5 NA is the "same base engine" as 276 3.0 TT, then so are 278 and 157. To me 278 and 157 are totally different (roots not withstanding) and so are 3.5NA and 3.0TT (even if both have 276 designation).
I can understand why they kept the engines in the SL (retooling costs) and even in the SUV's as the next gen of SUV's were getting all new engines. As mentioned, it has been unique that they put it into the S-Class facelift for the US only. The same S450's had the inline 6 elsewhere. Maybe to avoid homologation or EPA certification delays.
Last edited by Wolfman; Aug 26, 2021 at 10:02 PM.
I can understand why they kept the engines in the SL (retooling costs) and even in the SUV's as the next gen of SUV's were getting all new engines. As mentioned, it has been unique that they put it into the S-Class facelift for the US only. The same S450's had the inline 6 elsewhere. Maybe to avoid homologation or EPA certification delays.





