SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Is m6 faster than SL55?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-14-2006, 11:17 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Is m6 faster than SL55?

here's the question is M6 faster than SL55?

Discuss!
Old 12-15-2006, 05:39 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sprins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK63BS, SL55, G55, C43
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
here's the question is M6 faster than SL55?

Discuss!
Depreciation or 0-60 ?

Old 12-15-2006, 06:11 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
............probably pretty even and the edge going to the M6 at higher speeds.

Ted
Old 12-15-2006, 06:36 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Acez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 Kleemann CLK 230K, 2006 CLS 350, GTR R35
m6 all the way.....

*though its sad to say
Old 12-15-2006, 07:50 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
regor60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
06 E55 Black
Well, let's see...E55>SL55 and M6>E55, so....yes ! M6>SL55. 120 trap speed says it all
Old 12-15-2006, 08:14 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
egxpimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Ferrari F1 Factory
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F248 F1
Originally Posted by regor60
Well, let's see...E55>SL55 and M6>E55, so....yes ! M6>SL55. 120 trap speed says it all
Who care's their all 3 one hell of a ride

each in their own way
Old 12-15-2006, 10:23 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
here's the question is M6 faster than SL55?

Discuss!
The M6 is definitely faster 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile.

The SL55 has a lower CD (0.30 versus 0.32). As a result the SL55 should have the higher maximum velocity and could be faster from, say, 0 MPH to 200 MPH or in the standing mile.

BTW, everytime I see one of your posts I think to myself, he should change his username to "BoCanada."

Trending Topics

Old 12-15-2006, 11:16 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SleeperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by regor60
Well, let's see...E55>SL55 and M6>E55, so....yes ! M6>SL55. 120 trap speed says it all
M6>E55
What do you base this data on?
The best time I have seen for a M5 in the 1/4 mile is 12.5 at 114.75. At what track and when have you seen an M6 trap at 120mph. We should document it if that is the case.

Enzom ( a board member) has run a 11.9 @117mph. His car is stock. I have never seen an M6 run 11s stock or modded..

http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-10571.html
Old 12-15-2006, 11:17 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
bltserv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine, CA.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL55, 2000 CL500
M6 vs SL55

Originally Posted by jmf003
The M6 is definitely faster 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile.
I would not be so sure on that fact.

Been looking for one of these Beemers to test this on.
But not many of them on the road. Even here in So Cal.

M6 data sheet says 0-60 in 4.5 Secs.
SL55 spec says 0-60 in 4.4 Secs.

M6 has the ponies in the V10. 500+
But is lacking in the torque department. 380 vs 500+
M6 has higher redline 8500. So maybe quicker at super high speed
Like from 130 MPH on up. Not sure on the weight difference.
SL55 is pretty damn heavy.

Anybody out there have some "real world" experience with this question ?
Old 12-15-2006, 11:48 AM
  #10  
Almost a Member!
 
threesticks03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coral Gables
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 CLK 430, 2006 SL 55, 2006 Range Rover Sport, 2006 F-150 Super Crew
Though this is not completely relevant, I remember a clip from Top Gear when they were comparing a porsche 911, v8 vantage, and the M6. The M6 though extremely fast, its hard to utilize all 500 ponies. You have to go into the computer and select the type of driving style you would like.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=C_NJktdNcxk

Originally Posted by bltserv
I would not be so sure on that fact.

Been looking for one of these Beemers to test this on.
But not many of them on the road. Even here in So Cal.

M6 data sheet says 0-60 in 4.5 Secs.
SL55 spec says 0-60 in 4.4 Secs.

M6 has the ponies in the V10. 500+
But is lacking in the torque department. 380 vs 500+
M6 has higher redline 8500. So maybe quicker at super high speed
Like from 130 MPH on up. Not sure on the weight difference.
SL55 is pretty damn heavy.

Anybody out there have some "real world" experience with this question ?
Old 12-15-2006, 11:55 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Juice it's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bethesda,Md.
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bentley Arnage Red Label
dragtimes.com has a couple 1/4 times. I don't think any trapped over 114 if I remember right.
Old 12-15-2006, 12:39 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
bltserv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine, CA.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL55, 2000 CL500
Thumbs down M6

Originally Posted by threesticks03
Though this is not completely relevant, I remember a clip from Top Gear when they were comparing a porsche 911, v8 vantage, and the M6. The M6 though extremely fast, its hard to utilize all 500 ponies. You have to go into the computer and select the type of driving style you would like.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=C_NJktdNcxk

I looked at that Top Gear tape.
Damn. BMW has made that car so complicated. What a POS.
Does anybody on this board really own one of these things ?
I love technology. But you got to be kidding.
Old 12-15-2006, 02:14 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by bltserv
I looked at that Top Gear tape.
Damn. BMW has made that car so complicated. What a POS.
Does anybody on this board really own one of these things ?
I love technology. But you got to be kidding.
I dont think it is that much complicated its just people make big thing out of it, you programm it once and then you just press one button and everything is there for you. And that episode was in wet i bet M6 had no traction.
Old 12-15-2006, 03:23 PM
  #14  
Almost a Member!
 
Doc C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope to encounter an M6 sometime with my SL55. I know I'd win!!! Although.... I have the supercharger and 6,000+ ft. of altitude to my advantage!!!
Old 12-15-2006, 03:25 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jmf003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
'03 SL55
Originally Posted by bltserv
I would not be so sure on that fact.

Been looking for one of these Beemers to test this on.
But not many of them on the road. Even here in So Cal.

M6 data sheet says 0-60 in 4.5 Secs.
SL55 spec says 0-60 in 4.4 Secs.

M6 has the ponies in the V10. 500+
But is lacking in the torque department. 380 vs 500+
M6 has higher redline 8500. So maybe quicker at super high speed
Like from 130 MPH on up. Not sure on the weight difference.
SL55 is pretty damn heavy.

Anybody out there have some "real world" experience with this question ?
Fair enough. I was leaning completely on the Car and Driver test which produced a 4.1 0-60 and 12.4 quarter mile trapping at 121 for the M6. (http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...ecs-page3.html)

It would be problematic for a stock SL55 to match those times BUT it's a reasonable question to ask whether anyone else has duplicated the C&D times.
Old 12-15-2006, 03:39 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sprins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
CLK63BS, SL55, G55, C43
Originally Posted by Doc C
I hope to encounter an M6 sometime with my SL55. I know I'd win!!! Although.... I have the supercharger and 6,000+ ft. of altitude to my advantage!!!
Plus you'll look a lot better. Eventhough the M6 is a feisty looking thing, the SL really Pwns. Especially with nice weather
Old 12-15-2006, 03:59 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
bltserv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine, CA.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL55, 2000 CL500
Dragtimes

Originally Posted by jmf003
Fair enough. I was leaning completely on the Car and Driver test which produced a 4.1 0-60 and 12.4 quarter mile trapping at 121 for the M6. (http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...ecs-page3.html)

It would be problematic for a stock SL55 to match those times BUT it's a reasonable question to ask whether anyone else has duplicated the C&D times.
Looked at www.dragtimes.com
Looks very close indeed. Mid 12`s. 115 MPH. For both cars stock.
Going to depend very much on the driver and tires at the 1/4 mile.
BMW is going to need to catch that shifting perfect against SL55.
Old 12-15-2006, 06:49 PM
  #18  
Member
 
jamie140's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Burlington and Barrie, Ontario, Marco Island, Fl.
Posts: 105
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
19 Ferrari 488 Spyder, 19 911 Speedster, 19 Merc s63cab, 17 P Cayenne turbo, 16 Boxster Spyder,
Originally Posted by bltserv
I looked at that Top Gear tape.
Damn. BMW has made that car so complicated. What a POS.
Does anybody on this board really own one of these things ?
I love technology. But you got to be kidding.
I have no vested interest in whether you like the car or not, but to make that comment demonstrates your ignorance. You program the car as you like, then push one button as you're backing out of your drive in the morning.

To call it a pos? Please.
Old 12-15-2006, 06:51 PM
  #19  
Almost a Member!
 
threesticks03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coral Gables
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1999 CLK 430, 2006 SL 55, 2006 Range Rover Sport, 2006 F-150 Super Crew
It's definitely not a POS. It's a beautiful car, however I'm more of a Benz than Bimmer man. I also thought the 6's interior was a little lackluster, but that's just my opinion. It's also under 100k, which my beloved 55 is not...

Originally Posted by jamie140
I have no vested interest in whether you like the car or not, but to make that comment demonstrates your ignorance. You program the car as you like, then push one button as you're backing out of your drive in the morning.

To call it a pos? Please.
Old 12-15-2006, 07:00 PM
  #20  
Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05 SL 55 AMG, 01 Turbusa/8.43 @ 183..1/4 mi.
Originally Posted by threesticks03
It's definitely not a POS. It's a beautiful car, however I'm more of a Benz than Bimmer man. I also thought the 6's interior was a little lackluster, but that's just my opinion. It's also under 100k, which my beloved 55 is not...
Would my -55 with the RenTech Pulley and ECU stand a chance???

I honestly dunno.

Dave
Old 12-15-2006, 07:59 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
M6 is 5-star car

Yeah, modded SL55 would be faster in a straightline certainly in 1/4 mile but above 100 the M6 flies so the BM would probably still win that as it beat a K4 E55 and can do 205mph derestricted.

The M6 is stunning and is an awesome nearly-new buy- i'm joining the M6 club next summer and i'm already wishing away the days.
Old 12-16-2006, 08:46 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Acez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 Kleemann CLK 230K, 2006 CLS 350, GTR R35
ah..this argument between these two will never end

>> Carl Lassiter. any evidence of the M beats the K4? just curious <<
Old 12-16-2006, 12:17 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
bltserv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine, CA.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL55, 2000 CL500
OK It not a POS.

Originally Posted by jamie140
I have no vested interest in whether you like the car or not, but to make that comment demonstrates your ignorance. You program the car as you like, then push one button as you're backing out of your drive in the morning.

To call it a pos? Please.
Pardon my misuse of terms.

But I can see someone fumbling with the settings at a red light
to make sure wifey had not changed them before engaging
the throttle at the green. Seems a bit silly.

It seemed rather complicated to get the correct settings
and those silly Brits were really fumbling around with it that clip.
It just seems a bit over enginerred IMHO.

I have a good customer that has his new 5 Series
in the dealership more than he drives it. Lots of electrical
issues. I think he is about to "lemon it". That may have something
to do with my lack of trust in BMW`s new technologies.
And all the M3 kiddies driving insane down here in So Cal.

Please acccept my humble apology.
Old 12-16-2006, 04:22 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by bltserv
Pardon my misuse of terms.

But I can see someone fumbling with the settings at a red light
to make sure wifey had not changed them before engaging
the throttle at the green. Seems a bit silly.

It seemed rather complicated to get the correct settings
and those silly Brits were really fumbling around with it that clip.
It just seems a bit over enginerred IMHO.

I have a good customer that has his new 5 Series
in the dealership more than he drives it. Lots of electrical
issues. I think he is about to "lemon it". That may have something
to do with my lack of trust in BMW`s new technologies.
And all the M3 kiddies driving insane down here in So Cal.

Please acccept my humble apology.
Have you ever driven M5 or M6?
Old 12-16-2006, 04:36 PM
  #25  
Member
 
jamie140's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Burlington and Barrie, Ontario, Marco Island, Fl.
Posts: 105
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
19 Ferrari 488 Spyder, 19 911 Speedster, 19 Merc s63cab, 17 P Cayenne turbo, 16 Boxster Spyder,
Originally Posted by bltserv
Pardon my misuse of terms.

But I can see someone fumbling with the settings at a red light
to make sure wifey had not changed them before engaging
the throttle at the green. Seems a bit silly.

It seemed rather complicated to get the correct settings
and those silly Brits were really fumbling around with it that clip.
It just seems a bit over enginerred IMHO.

I have a good customer that has his new 5 Series
in the dealership more than he drives it. Lots of electrical
issues. I think he is about to "lemon it". That may have something
to do with my lack of trust in BMW`s new technologies.
And all the M3 kiddies driving insane down here in So Cal.

Please acccept my humble apology.
No problem. Didn't mean to sound aggressive.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Is m6 faster than SL55?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.