SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: new sl55 review in the car$driver nov. issue
10-06-2002, 12:09 AM
#2
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hilton Head Island
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1999 E55 AMG
0-60 in 4.5
0-100 in 10.9
1/4 mile in 13.0
0.91 g
70-0 in 175 ft. (very poor showing considering that the SL500 took only 155 ft.)
Actually, only the ML500 has done worse (183 ft.) in this braking test of all the recent MBs tested by Car and Driver. Nearly outbraked by an SUV! Say it aint so!
0-100 in 10.9
1/4 mile in 13.0
0.91 g
70-0 in 175 ft. (very poor showing considering that the SL500 took only 155 ft.)
Actually, only the ML500 has done worse (183 ft.) in this braking test of all the recent MBs tested by Car and Driver. Nearly outbraked by an SUV! Say it aint so!
10-06-2002, 07:40 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Paderborn (Germany)
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C-Class
the german magazine "auto, motor & sport" tested the new S600 in his current issue.
still waiting that the article goes online, but what really impressed me was the 0-100 km/h time of this 5,13m long luxus-liner:
4.5sec !!
they wrote the acceleration was so smooth, without extreme noise and smoking tyres, just pure power!
still waiting that the article goes online, but what really impressed me was the 0-100 km/h time of this 5,13m long luxus-liner:
4.5sec !!
they wrote the acceleration was so smooth, without extreme noise and smoking tyres, just pure power!
10-14-2002, 10:09 AM
#5
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brunei
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too Young To Drive
Originally posted by MRI Doc
0-60 in 4.5
0-100 in 10.9
1/4 mile in 13.0
0.91 g
70-0 in 175 ft. (very poor showing considering that the SL500 took only 155 ft.)
0-60 in 4.5
0-100 in 10.9
1/4 mile in 13.0
0.91 g
70-0 in 175 ft. (very poor showing considering that the SL500 took only 155 ft.)
0-60 in 4.39
1/4 mile in 12.55 @ 116.1
60-0 in 117 ft.
Slalom @ 66.7 mph
