SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Twin-Turbo Gallardo's Do 1/4 mile in 9.1 sec @ 169 MPH, video
Pronunciation: \ˈspēch-ləs\
Function: adjective
Date: before 12th century
1 : unable to speak
2 : not speaking
3 : not capable of being expressed in words
Last edited by kustom2k1; Nov 22, 2009 at 03:22 AM.
When you can not keep the wheels in traction by even the smallest amount of acceleration....you have too much power. What good is 1000 HP if you can not put it to the pavement and be able to control the car?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6mMQqPdVIw
Last edited by Addicted2Speed; Jan 25, 2010 at 06:01 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Zonda, etc etc are super cars that bite!
An AMG is a soft,cuddly and fast car, but not in these leagues. Super cars have 0-60's in the low 3's, an Sl65 is in the low 4's. And then there is the handling,on a twisty road with the extra power they have you would be left for dead. If your going to tune your 55 or 65 maybe they won't leave you so fast, but leave you they will. Personally I don't care for them except the looks, I would still have an AMG. Look at them by all means, but try to compare or beat them, forget it.Zonda, etc etc are super cars that bite!
An AMG is a soft,cuddly and fast car, but not in these leagues. Super cars have 0-60's in the low 3's, an Sl65 is in the low 4's. And then there is the handling,on a twisty road with the extra power they have you would be left for dead. If your going to tune your 55 or 65 maybe they won't leave you so fast, but leave you they will. Personally I don't care for them except the looks, I would still have an AMG. Look at them by all means, but try to compare or beat them, forget it.Last edited by Sunir; Jan 27, 2010 at 04:05 PM.
just a few weeks back Sound8 said his SL was a supercar so it's good he's learning...but remember the Lambo Diablo doesn't have a 0-60 on the 3s and it's still a supercar while the gtr is not...

-Rob
just a few weeks back Sound8 said his SL was a supercar so it's good he's learning...but remember the Lambo Diablo doesn't have a 0-60 on the 3s and it's still a supercar while the gtr is not...

-Rob
I think weight is a big culprit with amg cars...they are powerful but have that weight burden...but the acceleration figures and performance in amg cars especially when modded are well within supercar range, just as is the gtr you mentioned...
I think it's the exclusivity of the supercar that AMG is lacking...this along with the multiple trim lines of the same looking car or many models to satisfy a wide range of folks that "waters down" the supercar status potential for the higher end cars; even to some extent the black series varients, which I guess would be considered supercars (i.e Sl65 BS)
despite the definition.Strictly speaking, to get an AMG to handle and go like a supercar would a/ cost a fortune and b/ turn it into something unlike an AMG. It would be better to save your 150k and put the extra to buy the real thing, if that's what turns you on. There is one thing though, the SL63 is not bad on cornering and with the paddle shift and exhaust note you could be fooled into thinking you were in a true supercar.If you have a Gallardo TT you should have other cars to drive daily.
Comparing a SL of any stature to a Gallardo TT is dumb.
You pull the Gallardo TT out of the Garage when someone outruns your SL 63

BTW, not much traction is lost on the Gallardo TT because they are AWD and they have complex boost control systems in place. Its pretty amazing to have 1000hp on tap.
Pulled this post up when searching on Google.
I'm looking at TT kits etc. lol Its a little old.
Last edited by ScottCLS55; Sep 27, 2010 at 11:20 PM.



