SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Should I get a SL65?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-29-2012, 01:35 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL65, UGR LP650, UGR Scuderia,UGR Superleggera, 850hp CTS-V ect.
Should I get a SL65?

I really like my SL55, but was thinking about getting a SL65. My 55 has the Eurocharged stage 3 package and runs great. Is the SL65 that much better??

SW
Old 08-29-2012, 02:16 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
RonnieRenaldi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55 AMG & BMW F10
Just easier to get to 700hp 800+ft/lbs, not sure about driveability & handling since I haven't driven one.

BTW, let me know you're indeed getting an SL65 and parting out the 55
Old 08-29-2012, 05:28 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
AZBENZ-CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO SL600 E55 BRABUS*SOLD*
Originally Posted by streetking
I really like my SL55, but was thinking about getting a SL65. My 55 has the Eurocharged stage 3 package and runs great. Is the SL65 that much better??

SW
Buy an SL600, you'll save a bunch of $ then buying the same year 65
then spend 1k on the tune and you'll have a faster car than stock SL65
Old 08-29-2012, 07:45 PM
  #4  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts
You don't want sl65 power in sl600 chasis. I really think that when pushed hard a stock sl600 is a liability handling- wise. Adding more power to an already inadequate (IMO) chassis is not something I would do.

If you want an sl65 power- get it with the right handling package (big brakes, properly calibrated asc, lsd, abc and all).
Old 08-29-2012, 09:04 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
allenjdmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 41 Posts
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
Well

I've had both, and you'd probably be surprised to know that I would choose another 55. I'm sure everyone else's here thinks I'm nuts. Actually, would choose an SL 63.
Old 08-29-2012, 10:31 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
AZBENZ-CTSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO SL600 E55 BRABUS*SOLD*
Originally Posted by alx
You don't want sl65 power in sl600 chasis. I really think that when pushed hard a stock sl600 is a liability handling- wise. Adding more power to an already inadequate (IMO) chassis is not something I would do.

If you want an sl65 power- get it with the right handling package (big brakes, properly calibrated asc, lsd, abc and all).
ALX: Point taken, i usually take the 600 when i just wanna go ROCKET fast in a straight line
Old 08-30-2012, 09:16 AM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL65, UGR LP650, UGR Scuderia,UGR Superleggera, 850hp CTS-V ect.
Originally Posted by allenjdmb
I've had both, and you'd probably be surprised to know that I would choose another 55. I'm sure everyone else's here thinks I'm nuts. Actually, would choose an SL 63.
Why??
Old 08-30-2012, 02:40 PM
  #8  
Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 SL550
Based on your other cars, you are not going to be happy with anything but an SL65. My 09 handles considerably better than my 06. I velvet smooth hammer. It is not a 458.
Old 08-30-2012, 08:37 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
carlsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 270
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What ALX said. Get the 65. Whole car designed to accommodate higher power.
Old 08-30-2012, 10:59 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
WHTEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
07' SL65, 04' E55, 03' Evo8, 08' GSXR, DSM's...
65 all the way

Aaron
Old 08-31-2012, 10:21 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
IngenereAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
We have had all three cars in for tuning, and I still feel that the 55 is the better overall package.

The real driving experience isn't just about ultimate hp. At some point it becomes unusable. The 600 chassis isn't really up to the task for anything but a straight line. The 65 has just a bit too much weight in the nose, and while still a tank, the 55 is just a more balanced package and definitely less expensive to maintain.
Old 08-31-2012, 01:36 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
streetking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL65, UGR LP650, UGR Scuderia,UGR Superleggera, 850hp CTS-V ect.
Originally Posted by IngenereAMG
We have had all three cars in for tuning, and I still feel that the 55 is the better overall package.

The real driving experience isn't just about ultimate hp. At some point it becomes unusable. The 600 chassis isn't really up to the task for anything but a straight line. The 65 has just a bit too much weight in the nose, and while still a tank, the 55 is just a more balanced package and definitely less expensive to maintain.
Thanks for the input. I understand what you are saying, but SL's in general don't handle very well anyway. The car is fun, but I just wanted a car with more top end than the 55. I'm just not sure spending the extra $25k is worth it..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Should I get a SL65?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.