SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: First impressions: KLEEMANN SL65 ECU upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-24-2004, 06:06 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
RU_MATRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Toluca Lake, CA.
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 SL55 AMG
Treynor, progressively hearing your enthusiasm as well as the scope of aftermarket enhancements (great potential leaps vs. stock) makes the SL65 AMG more and more tempting for me although my financial sensibilities say STOP!

Last edited by RU_MATRX; 11-24-2004 at 06:08 PM.
Old 11-25-2004, 08:12 AM
  #27  
Member
 
Mardeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the biggest tires you can fit in a SL65?? 295?? 305??
Old 11-25-2004, 04:52 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
G Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man that is crazy.

So roughly what is your S600, Viper and SL65 pushing out each?
Old 11-25-2004, 05:31 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vdubpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 6,260
Received 54 Likes on 42 Posts
i drive them all, fast and hard
what can u now do wit h 700 hp that ucouldnt with 600?? crazy


g unit, why get a 2004 s55 over the 2003, what are the changes
Old 11-25-2004, 06:04 PM
  #30  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
treynor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL65, 911
> So roughly what is your S600, Viper and SL65 pushing out each?

SRT/10 Viper: 475 RWHP, 3350 lbs
S600: 525 RWHP, 4650 lbs
SL65: ??? RWHP (stock is 520), 4475 lbs
Old 11-28-2004, 02:39 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
G Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vdubpower
what can u now do wit h 700 hp that ucouldnt with 600?? crazy


g unit, why get a 2004 s55 over the 2003, what are the changes
2004 has an upgraded version of the comand in the 2003. It also has every option on the list bar a few. The 2003 had a slightly dodgy respray so we got it traded in for a brand new one.

Treynor thats immense, but what does that translate to "normal" bhp. ie with the S600 having 493 and SL65 having 612 as stock?
Old 11-28-2004, 09:36 PM
  #32  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
treynor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL65, 911
For Mercedes 5-sp auto cars, divide RWHP by 0.81 to get BHP. Thus, for example, the S600's 525 RWHP translates to (525/0.81 = ) 648 BHP.

For the Viper, divide RWHP by 0.87: (475 / 0.87 = ) 546 BHP.
Old 11-29-2004, 06:41 AM
  #33  
Super Member
 
Bilal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz A170 CDI
Ben, when can we expect some more speedo/tach videos?
Old 01-25-2005, 09:17 PM
  #34  
Almost a Member!
 
viper65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BrandonG
These figures describe the hardware change version of the 65 upgrade where the turbos are changed. The ECU only upgrade adds approx 129 hp and 200 lbs/ft of torque- these are not peak to peak gains. The mid range from 2200 to 5100 is where the major increases are found. Peak HP numbers will rise approx 10%, TQ approx 30%- the gains through the mid range are rather huge.

The webiste will be updated to address the differences bewteen the two levels of tuning, my apologies for it being not as precise as it should be.

I am confident that our bi-turbo ECU solutions are every bit as effective as anyones elses, if not better. We will meet or beat any valid offer for bi-turbo tuning.

Looking forward to the postings of dyno's and ET's-
You got a PM from me
Old 04-24-2009, 11:26 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
jg8881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sl 65 amg kleemann
Thanks Kleemann

Kleemann just installed a ecu upgrade on my sl 65 amg .
It exceeded what they claim and renntech or brabus.
The Dyno proved it on a conservative run i all gears games etc.
No doubt the best in the buisness is Kleemann USA.
Brandon , Cory and Erik are the most knoledgeable in the buisness .
I have owned Mercedes for 17 years and many a car , I thought I new MB inside and out but I can't hold a candle to Brandon at Kleemann USA in Colorado Spgs. He knows his buisness period and produces .
It is not about Price but satifaction and Brandon delivares every time , this is my 3 major product from them.
Do not even think of going to Renntech or Brabus , call Brandon .
If you have a MB call Kleemann , you won't be disapointed.
Old 04-24-2009, 11:27 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
 
jg8881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sl 65 amg kleemann
Klleemn did a KD Box on my GL 320 CDI and a great purchase 3-5 MPG and power . Why won't you do it????
Old 04-24-2009, 11:28 PM
  #37  
Junior Member
 
jg8881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sl 65 amg kleemann
Kleeman did a SL 600 , LSD , and ECU , stock 65 equal .
Old 04-30-2009, 04:04 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 314
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mercedes S600TT, LX470 SuperCharged, QX4, BMW 750IL
I am debating between Renntech and Kleemann for my S600TT. Price is not a problem. I read a lot of satisfied customers from Kleemann but see proven numbers/race times for Renntech. Any advice/input is greatly appreciated.
Old 04-30-2009, 09:07 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
IngenereAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
Originally Posted by Reckless
I am debating between Renntech and Kleemann for my S600TT. Price is not a problem. I read a lot of satisfied customers from Kleemann but see proven numbers/race times for Renntech. Any advice/input is greatly appreciated.
We have a fair number of thrilled 600 clients. Let me know if you have any questions.

Here is one of our client's dynos, before he had us do his TCU. His results are on our testimonials page. http://www.veloceperformance.com/testimonial.htm
I believe that he is the 14th from the top.
Attached Thumbnails First impressions: KLEEMANN SL65 ECU upgrade-600tt.jpg  
Old 04-30-2009, 08:42 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Kleemann/RENNtech TOP results on SL600 & SL65 both models attain nearly equal results after ECU/TCU they achieve 116 MORE RWTO than TOP Veloce efforts...Go KLEEMANN or RENNtech folks

Veloce Dyno, notice rear wheel torque @ 600...


Apples to apples, SAME type of Dynodynamics machine used in both examples...Just compare the graph lines of each, the RENNtech achieves higher rwhp more importantly much higher 716 rwto @ 31-3200 RPM's while Veloce doesn't reach their peak Torque until 4000 RPM's @ 600 rwto (RENNtech maintains MORE HP/Torque throughout the ENTIRE RPM dyno curve)

Now RENNtech Dyno on 2004 SL600, need I say more? Kleemann fetches the same #'s

Last edited by Thericker; 04-30-2009 at 09:21 PM.
Old 04-30-2009, 11:30 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
jg8881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sl 65 amg kleemann
Go Kleemann USA and ask for Brandon , per Blaine

The are more dragtime stats for renntech so you can't compare .On the dyno Kleemann is better , so dyno's don't have varibles as 1/4 mile races , reaction, tires humity, temp, tires, age etc.
Dynos at Kleemann I have see in person no funny stuff.
Bradon is straight up.
Kleemann is better , an untalked about item is daily driving . Renntech dumps all at the top and not as smooth on the low end in daily driving , not all of it is about mashing the foot pedal.
Go Kleemnn





Originally Posted by Reckless
I am debating between Renntech and Kleemann for my S600TT. Price is not a problem. I read a lot of satisfied customers from Kleemann but see proven numbers/race times for Renntech. Any advice/input is greatly appreciated.
Old 04-30-2009, 11:34 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
jg8881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sl 65 amg kleemann
Go sl 65 amg and chip it

The sl 65 is the way to go.
The only upgrade is a ECU reflash. It has the LSD rear , bigger brakes , suppension upgrades, resale, more options the sl 600 doesn't or cost to get or install after. Get the 65 and don't look back.
Tires go with Mich PS2 no others come close.
Old 04-30-2009, 11:37 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DFW01E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,566
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
'14 ML BT
Originally Posted by jg8881
...
Tires go with Mich PS2 no others come close.
Experience or conjecture?

Have you tried the Pirelli Corsa's?
They smoke the PS2's.
Yes, I've had both.

Sorry for the thread jack, back to your regular programming.
Old 04-30-2009, 11:44 PM
  #44  
Member
 
CA_E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 187
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
05 E55, 07 SL65, 06 S4
Originally Posted by Reckless
I am debating between Renntech and Kleemann for my S600TT. Price is not a problem. I read a lot of satisfied customers from Kleemann but see proven numbers/race times for Renntech. Any advice/input is greatly appreciated.
Here is some food for thought about the Kleemann boys: A couple of years ago, they trailered their 600+ HP E55 to an airstrip event in Sweden and got their a$$ handed to them by a stock M5 (do a search, this was the discussion forum event of the decade)
In the Nov/04 issue of C&D, Kleemann provided their SL55 K3 with a claimed 630Hp for the 10,000 HP Slugfest, Renntech provided a SL600 with a claimed 640HP; the result in that magazine was a 12.5 @114 for the Kleemann and 11.8 @ 121 for the Renntech - both kinda slow, but same place, same drivers.

My conclusion: Kleemann is at least as good in performance hyperbole marketing as they are in producing the real world performance to the rear wheels. I am not suggesting their services and products are useless, it just appears for a real world assessment of gains its better to divide their claimed HP gains by two is more realistic.
But who cares: Both Heffner and UGR today take claim to 1,300 HP twinturbo, streetable Gallardos, who am I to quibble about +/- 50HP on a MB
Old 05-01-2009, 05:26 PM
  #45  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Autoscope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E350 Sport & Rs6
So who wants an ECU upgrade? I would love to see some Kleemann AMG's against each other on our dyno's!!!

That's some stout power guys!!! I have seen 694RWT on a stock SL65!
Old 05-01-2009, 08:24 PM
  #46  
Junior Member
 
jg8881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sl 65 amg kleemann
Smile Apples to Apples

You can not compare a SL55 to a SL 600
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
Old 05-01-2009, 09:01 PM
  #47  
Super Member
 
E55AMGFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS430
Originally Posted by jg8881
You can not compare a SL55 to a SL 600
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .

Very strong numbers! Do you have a dyno chart to post?
Old 05-01-2009, 09:40 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by jg8881
You can not compare a SL55 to a SL 600
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
Seriously doubt you got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. outt've Just ECU for Kleemann SL65 VRP's 825 pkg has upgraded/larger Intercoolers/ IC pump/CAI/Exhaust work/ trunk res/ more importantly a 100 OCTANE tune & fetched 694 rwhp 912 rwto, what's important here the RWHP please stop the

I love Kleemann/Renntech tunes, & will have the Kleemann on my SL600 soon, you are totally off on thinking the 600's make less power than the 65's after tuning I've seen countless post tuning Dyno's that prove this...
The Turbo sizing dictates final power (they are the same on both 600/65 models) the extra half liter in displacement doesn't dictate the extra power.

The Stock 65 AMG Ecu map is set w/much higher BOOST LEVELS than the stock 600 TT & accounts for the majority of power differences between the 2 models..

Last edited by Thericker; 05-01-2009 at 09:49 PM.
Old 05-01-2009, 09:47 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Originally Posted by Adam@Autoscope
So who wants an ECU upgrade? I would love to see some Kleemann AMG's against each other on our dyno's!!!

That's some stout power guys!!! I have seen 694RWT on a stock SL65!
I've been researching these engines for quite sometime, never have I seen a STOCK 65 motor put down 694 RWTO on average they put down 500-520 RWHP 630-650 RWTO in STOCK FORM. Please post this dyno I know there can be factory freaks but this is def NOT the average STOCK 65 AMG Only after an ECU tune have these type of #'s been seen...
Old 05-03-2009, 12:56 PM
  #50  
Super Member
 
E55AMGFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LS430
Originally Posted by Thericker
Seriously doubt you got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. outt've Just ECU for Kleemann SL65 VRP's 825 pkg has upgraded/larger Intercoolers/ IC pump/CAI/Exhaust work/ trunk res/ more importantly a 100 OCTANE tune & fetched 694 rwhp 912 rwto, what's important here the RWHP please stop the

I love Kleemann/Renntech tunes, & will have the Kleemann on my SL600 soon, you are totally off on thinking the 600's make less power than the 65's after tuning I've seen countless post tuning Dyno's that prove this...
The Turbo sizing dictates final power (they are the same on both 600/65 models) the extra half liter in displacement doesn't dictate the extra power.

The Stock 65 AMG Ecu map is set w/much higher BOOST LEVELS than the stock 600 TT & accounts for the majority of power differences between the 2 models..
Any reason why you chose Kleeman over Renntech? Is it because of the sale going on? Well said about the power numbers he made, they sound a bit out of this world as I've never seen a 65 reach there on a ECU Tune alone.

Last edited by E55AMGFan; 05-04-2009 at 10:02 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: First impressions: KLEEMANN SL65 ECU upgrade



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.