SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: First impressions: KLEEMANN SL65 ECU upgrade
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Toluca Lake, CA.
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 SL55 AMG
Treynor, progressively hearing your enthusiasm as well as the scope of aftermarket enhancements (great potential leaps vs. stock) makes the SL65 AMG more and more tempting for me although my financial sensibilities say STOP!
Last edited by RU_MATRX; 11-24-2004 at 06:08 PM.
#31
Originally Posted by vdubpower
what can u now do wit h 700 hp that ucouldnt with 600?? crazy
g unit, why get a 2004 s55 over the 2003, what are the changes
g unit, why get a 2004 s55 over the 2003, what are the changes
Treynor thats immense, but what does that translate to "normal" bhp. ie with the S600 having 493 and SL65 having 612 as stock?
#32
For Mercedes 5-sp auto cars, divide RWHP by 0.81 to get BHP. Thus, for example, the S600's 525 RWHP translates to (525/0.81 = ) 648 BHP.
For the Viper, divide RWHP by 0.87: (475 / 0.87 = ) 546 BHP.
For the Viper, divide RWHP by 0.87: (475 / 0.87 = ) 546 BHP.
#34
Originally Posted by BrandonG
These figures describe the hardware change version of the 65 upgrade where the turbos are changed. The ECU only upgrade adds approx 129 hp and 200 lbs/ft of torque- these are not peak to peak gains. The mid range from 2200 to 5100 is where the major increases are found. Peak HP numbers will rise approx 10%, TQ approx 30%- the gains through the mid range are rather huge.
The webiste will be updated to address the differences bewteen the two levels of tuning, my apologies for it being not as precise as it should be.
I am confident that our bi-turbo ECU solutions are every bit as effective as anyones elses, if not better. We will meet or beat any valid offer for bi-turbo tuning.
Looking forward to the postings of dyno's and ET's-
The webiste will be updated to address the differences bewteen the two levels of tuning, my apologies for it being not as precise as it should be.
I am confident that our bi-turbo ECU solutions are every bit as effective as anyones elses, if not better. We will meet or beat any valid offer for bi-turbo tuning.
Looking forward to the postings of dyno's and ET's-
#35
Thanks Kleemann
Kleemann just installed a ecu upgrade on my sl 65 amg .
It exceeded what they claim and renntech or brabus.
The Dyno proved it on a conservative run i all gears games etc.
No doubt the best in the buisness is Kleemann USA.
Brandon , Cory and Erik are the most knoledgeable in the buisness .
I have owned Mercedes for 17 years and many a car , I thought I new MB inside and out but I can't hold a candle to Brandon at Kleemann USA in Colorado Spgs. He knows his buisness period and produces .
It is not about Price but satifaction and Brandon delivares every time , this is my 3 major product from them.
Do not even think of going to Renntech or Brabus , call Brandon .
If you have a MB call Kleemann , you won't be disapointed.
It exceeded what they claim and renntech or brabus.
The Dyno proved it on a conservative run i all gears games etc.
No doubt the best in the buisness is Kleemann USA.
Brandon , Cory and Erik are the most knoledgeable in the buisness .
I have owned Mercedes for 17 years and many a car , I thought I new MB inside and out but I can't hold a candle to Brandon at Kleemann USA in Colorado Spgs. He knows his buisness period and produces .
It is not about Price but satifaction and Brandon delivares every time , this is my 3 major product from them.
Do not even think of going to Renntech or Brabus , call Brandon .
If you have a MB call Kleemann , you won't be disapointed.
#38
Senior Member
I am debating between Renntech and Kleemann for my S600TT. Price is not a problem. I read a lot of satisfied customers from Kleemann but see proven numbers/race times for Renntech. Any advice/input is greatly appreciated.
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
Here is one of our client's dynos, before he had us do his TCU. His results are on our testimonials page. http://www.veloceperformance.com/testimonial.htm
I believe that he is the 14th from the top.
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Kleemann/RENNtech TOP results on SL600 & SL65 both models attain nearly equal results after ECU/TCU they achieve 116 MORE RWTO than TOP Veloce efforts...Go KLEEMANN or RENNtech folks
Veloce Dyno, notice rear wheel torque @ 600...
Apples to apples, SAME type of Dynodynamics machine used in both examples...Just compare the graph lines of each, the RENNtech achieves higher rwhp more importantly much higher 716 rwto @ 31-3200 RPM's while Veloce doesn't reach their peak Torque until 4000 RPM's @ 600 rwto (RENNtech maintains MORE HP/Torque throughout the ENTIRE RPM dyno curve)
Now RENNtech Dyno on 2004 SL600, need I say more? Kleemann fetches the same #'s
Veloce Dyno, notice rear wheel torque @ 600...
Apples to apples, SAME type of Dynodynamics machine used in both examples...Just compare the graph lines of each, the RENNtech achieves higher rwhp more importantly much higher 716 rwto @ 31-3200 RPM's while Veloce doesn't reach their peak Torque until 4000 RPM's @ 600 rwto (RENNtech maintains MORE HP/Torque throughout the ENTIRE RPM dyno curve)
Now RENNtech Dyno on 2004 SL600, need I say more? Kleemann fetches the same #'s
Last edited by Thericker; 04-30-2009 at 09:21 PM.
#41
Go Kleemann USA and ask for Brandon , per Blaine
The are more dragtime stats for renntech so you can't compare .On the dyno Kleemann is better , so dyno's don't have varibles as 1/4 mile races , reaction, tires humity, temp, tires, age etc.
Dynos at Kleemann I have see in person no funny stuff.
Bradon is straight up.
Kleemann is better , an untalked about item is daily driving . Renntech dumps all at the top and not as smooth on the low end in daily driving , not all of it is about mashing the foot pedal.
Go Kleemnn
Dynos at Kleemann I have see in person no funny stuff.
Bradon is straight up.
Kleemann is better , an untalked about item is daily driving . Renntech dumps all at the top and not as smooth on the low end in daily driving , not all of it is about mashing the foot pedal.
Go Kleemnn
#42
Go sl 65 amg and chip it
The sl 65 is the way to go.
The only upgrade is a ECU reflash. It has the LSD rear , bigger brakes , suppension upgrades, resale, more options the sl 600 doesn't or cost to get or install after. Get the 65 and don't look back.
Tires go with Mich PS2 no others come close.
The only upgrade is a ECU reflash. It has the LSD rear , bigger brakes , suppension upgrades, resale, more options the sl 600 doesn't or cost to get or install after. Get the 65 and don't look back.
Tires go with Mich PS2 no others come close.
#43
#44
Member
In the Nov/04 issue of C&D, Kleemann provided their SL55 K3 with a claimed 630Hp for the 10,000 HP Slugfest, Renntech provided a SL600 with a claimed 640HP; the result in that magazine was a 12.5 @114 for the Kleemann and 11.8 @ 121 for the Renntech - both kinda slow, but same place, same drivers.
My conclusion: Kleemann is at least as good in performance hyperbole marketing as they are in producing the real world performance to the rear wheels. I am not suggesting their services and products are useless, it just appears for a real world assessment of gains its better to divide their claimed HP gains by two is more realistic.
But who cares: Both Heffner and UGR today take claim to 1,300 HP twinturbo, streetable Gallardos, who am I to quibble about +/- 50HP on a MB
#45
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E350 Sport & Rs6
So who wants an ECU upgrade? I would love to see some Kleemann AMG's against each other on our dyno's!!!
That's some stout power guys!!! I have seen 694RWT on a stock SL65!
That's some stout power guys!!! I have seen 694RWT on a stock SL65!
#46
Apples to Apples
You can not compare a SL55 to a SL 600
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
#47
You can not compare a SL55 to a SL 600
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
Very strong numbers! Do you have a dyno chart to post?
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
You can not compare a SL55 to a SL 600
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
Big differance look at torque alone . Sl600 is faster stock as well the numbers look correct for what to expect as the differance between to two as stock .
I have not tried the Pirelli C. Like to .
Thanks for the info.
The Renntech numbers vs Kleemannn are not close as the posted Dyno chart to the dyno . I got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. on avg. Strong no correction number or games .
I love Kleemann/Renntech tunes, & will have the Kleemann on my SL600 soon, you are totally off on thinking the 600's make less power than the 65's after tuning I've seen countless post tuning Dyno's that prove this...
The Turbo sizing dictates final power (they are the same on both 600/65 models) the extra half liter in displacement doesn't dictate the extra power.
The Stock 65 AMG Ecu map is set w/much higher BOOST LEVELS than the stock 600 TT & accounts for the majority of power differences between the 2 models..
Last edited by Thericker; 05-01-2009 at 09:49 PM.
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
I've been researching these engines for quite sometime, never have I seen a STOCK 65 motor put down 694 RWTO on average they put down 500-520 RWHP 630-650 RWTO in STOCK FORM. Please post this dyno I know there can be factory freaks but this is def NOT the average STOCK 65 AMG Only after an ECU tune have these type of #'s been seen...
#50
Seriously doubt you got 636 rwhp and 772 rwtq. outt've Just ECU for Kleemann SL65 VRP's 825 pkg has upgraded/larger Intercoolers/ IC pump/CAI/Exhaust work/ trunk res/ more importantly a 100 OCTANE tune & fetched 694 rwhp 912 rwto, what's important here the RWHP please stop the
I love Kleemann/Renntech tunes, & will have the Kleemann on my SL600 soon, you are totally off on thinking the 600's make less power than the 65's after tuning I've seen countless post tuning Dyno's that prove this...
The Turbo sizing dictates final power (they are the same on both 600/65 models) the extra half liter in displacement doesn't dictate the extra power.
The Stock 65 AMG Ecu map is set w/much higher BOOST LEVELS than the stock 600 TT & accounts for the majority of power differences between the 2 models..
I love Kleemann/Renntech tunes, & will have the Kleemann on my SL600 soon, you are totally off on thinking the 600's make less power than the 65's after tuning I've seen countless post tuning Dyno's that prove this...
The Turbo sizing dictates final power (they are the same on both 600/65 models) the extra half liter in displacement doesn't dictate the extra power.
The Stock 65 AMG Ecu map is set w/much higher BOOST LEVELS than the stock 600 TT & accounts for the majority of power differences between the 2 models..
Last edited by E55AMGFan; 05-04-2009 at 10:02 AM.