SLK-Class (R171) 2004-2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

SLK/R171: New MB SLK-Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-08-2004, 12:48 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 440
Received 57 Likes on 49 Posts
2017 AMG GT S
Originally posted by session
Pontiac Aztek?
Lexus SC430?

You must be joking.
No joke. To my eyes, these cars are beauty queens next to a Z4.

I have seen pictures of a totalled Z4 that looks better than a pristine Z4 sitting in the showroom.
Old 01-08-2004, 01:06 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RedSLKChic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guy's are funny


Anyway, I do like the new SLK better than my style and the SLK55 is awesome! I LOVE the exhaust and the sport kit And the interior is much much better However, after owning the SLK for a year, buying another would be a bad decision. I have had my car in back at the dealer 7 times in 13 months. But I think my biggest complaint is lack of a back seat. Obviously I knew this when I bought it, but I thought I would be fine with that. I mean, in 2 years of owning my Cougar I've only use the back seat twice (that's mainly because the "touch your dirty feet on anything and you die" rule was in effect for shows). But I miss throwing all my junk back there And I really miss being able to recline the seats!! Unless I completely BLOWN away when I see the 55 in person, theres a 95% chance I won't be getting another SLK. Most likely I'll be going for a sports coupe/sedan, and if it happens to be convertible, then so be it A quick, luxury, AWD, coupe would be perfection! :p But I guess I'll have to settle for less.
Old 01-08-2004, 01:20 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
tuscanraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bantha
Originally posted by session
Pontiac Aztek?
Lexus SC430?

You must be joking.
Maybe not worse, but just as bad. C'mon lets be candid. the Z4 is a design catastrophy. The 7, 5, Z4, and Alpina are tremendous visual disappointments. BMW has the X and the 3 thats it. And the way they are going those will be F'd soon too. This little SLK looks better than anything BMW can presently offer.
Old 01-08-2004, 01:44 PM
  #29  
moomeh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
wow. bilal. thx for the pics and vid.
Old 01-08-2004, 01:57 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dave OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
R170
Originally posted by trench
The MBspy website seems to imply that the Euro SLKs will have CGI (although apparently the acronym is being changed to KPI ). I'd imagine there should be a non-CGI version, just like with the engine that is in the current C230s, but the trade off is a loss of some percentage of the horsepower generated (sorry I don't know the exact numbers).

Guess we won't know for sure until MBUSA makes their announcements.
I don't know how many times this has been discussed, but there is no question the R171 will have an SLK350 model with the all new 3.5l V-6. It will produce 272 hp and 350 nm of torque - this is confirmed, no question about it.

http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=257
Old 01-08-2004, 04:26 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ajayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Moon
Posts: 7,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
marta
Originally posted by session
Pontiac Aztek?
Lexus SC430?

You must be joking.

The Aztek is f^ing butt-ugly!

The SC430 isn't THAT bad, but not the best looking car though.
Old 01-08-2004, 04:31 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sleestack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tuscanraider
Maybe not worse, but just as bad. C'mon lets be candid. the Z4 is a design catastrophy. The 7, 5, Z4, and Alpina are tremendous visual disappointments. BMW has the X and the 3 thats it. And the way they are going those will be F'd soon too. This little SLK looks better than anything BMW can presently offer.
Alpina? Are you talking about the Alpina Z8? If you are, I don't see how you can say that car is a visual disappointment. It looks pretty much like a regular Z8, which IMO is a gorgeous roadster. I actually think the Z4 looks alot better than its predecessor the Z3... at least not as girly.
Old 01-08-2004, 04:38 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
session's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SF
Posts: 8,189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2007 VW GTI
Originally posted by tuscanraider
Maybe not worse, but just as bad. C'mon lets be candid. the Z4 is a design catastrophy. The 7, 5, Z4, and Alpina are tremendous visual disappointments. BMW has the X and the 3 thats it. And the way they are going those will be F'd soon too. This little SLK looks better than anything BMW can presently offer.
I profoundly disagree. Surely you aren't seriously equating the Z4 to the Aztek.

Regardless, the Alpina Z8 is one of the most beautiful modern cars I've seen.


Last edited by session; 01-08-2004 at 04:41 PM.
Old 01-08-2004, 05:24 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
tuscanraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bantha
Originally posted by session
I profoundly disagree. Surely you aren't seriously equating the Z4 to the Aztek.

Regardless, the Alpina Z8 is one of the most beautiful modern cars I've seen.

I surely am...the Z4 looks like a shoe, I think they modeled it after a Ford Festiva. The Aztec just look like GM tried to make an aerodynamic brick.

Not too many people shared your view on the Alpina, seeing as BMW scrapped it already....
Old 01-08-2004, 07:36 PM
  #35  
Member
Thread Starter
 
lorinsertuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
S550 4matic LE
aztek and z4 are both horrible looking cars
but i think another worlds worst is the PT cruiser and now that the convert. of that is coming out it just looks even worse
Old 01-09-2004, 10:27 AM
  #36  
Guest0001
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: SLK55 AMG

Originally posted by Bilal







Great Pics! New SLK is going to be awesome!!!!
Old 01-12-2004, 02:07 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Supra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hamilton , ONT. Canada
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK320 & SLK230
very nice , very very nice indeed ~~~~
Old 01-29-2004, 04:11 PM
  #38  
Almost a Member!
 
milkpowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E320
Amazing! I'll take the SLK over the Z4 any day!.

The SLK has better engines, and the interior is a lot better as well.

I guess we'll all have to wait till they actually start shipping to know how much better it actually is (performance wise) compared to its competitors.
Old 02-01-2004, 02:02 AM
  #39  
Newbie
 
handsome_gary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C200K
Angry

hey guys I have a Z4 and if ur only talking about looks then I don't think i have much to say. some people thinks it looks nice some thinks its a piece of junk.
Anywayz what I'm trying to say here is if you've never driven a Z4 especially the 3.0 ltr one then take one for a spin and u'll be surprised.
I've driven the current SLK not the R171 cos its not out yet obviously, the boxster and the Z4. I personally like the Z4 very much cos its the quickest out of them all and the handling is superb cos the Z4 has the electronic steering system thingy ( i don't know the exact name for it). what that means is that when u drive at a higher speed the tension of the steering wheel tightens which makes the car easier to handle and more stable.

I have a C200K as well and to be honest I really don't like it cos the kompressor kicks in too late where as the BMWs the power comes as u floor it...however I will consider the R171 cos I think its a really nice car and the specs shows that its a more powerful car than the Z4.
Old 02-01-2004, 03:14 AM
  #40  
Member
 
jleung88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wrong board here buddy.

1st, you're driving a Z4, you test drove a boxster S, both pretty bad cars....

slk32 would take you out any day of the yr, put aside the new slk55.

I currently drive a C32, and I could take out a boxster S without even pushing my car hard.........Z4? Hm.........
Old 02-01-2004, 05:20 AM
  #41  
Newbie
 
handsome_gary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C200K
yeah yeah !!
I'm comparing the Z4 with the non AMG mercedes benz. hello ? for example an SLK 320 or 230K ???
why don't u compare ur C32 with a lamborghini ? huh ? if u wanna compare ur C32 AMG with bmw then compare with the M versions of BMW. However BMW hasn't lauched the M version of the Z4 yet. If they do I bet it'll kick ur C32's *** any time.
So compare cars that are in the similar price range and class buddy !!!
and plus i didn't start talking about Z4 here first..
i drive both bmw and mercedes so take that !!
Old 02-01-2004, 10:56 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ajayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Moon
Posts: 7,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
marta
***** car.
Old 02-01-2004, 12:50 PM
  #43  
Member
 
jleung88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slk32 > m3 coupe (whatever you call that car)

so by trend

slk55 > m4 coupe
Old 02-01-2004, 01:08 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bmms8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,110
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
MB
Originally posted by jleung88
slk32 > m3 coupe (whatever you call that car)

so by trend

slk55 > m4 coupe
there is no such thing as an m4, the numbers dont go up with every generation

and btw, most enthusiasts will tell you that the M3 is a better "sports" car than the SLK32.
Old 02-01-2004, 01:16 PM
  #45  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
SLK32 is a droptop. M3 isn't. Don't tell me that cloth thing counts. Oh I'm biased

M3 is a better drivers car when compared to the R170, but the R170 is like a mini crusier with speed. Think of R230 bite sized.
Old 02-01-2004, 03:11 PM
  #46  
Member
 
jleung88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I meant the M coupe or the M roadster.
Old 02-01-2004, 03:37 PM
  #47  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Ah whoops. Sorry about that.

I've seen a MRoadster (those are the Z3 things with a hatchback right?)

But what is a MCoupe? My mind is drawing a blank.
Old 02-01-2004, 04:51 PM
  #48  
Almost a Member!
 
milkpowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E320
The M Coupe is basically a Z3 with a hard top. Quite frankly, I was and will never be a fan of the Z3. I don't know why. Although, a while ago, I saw this random comparison between the SLK32 AMG and the Z3. The Z3 came out as the winner because is was the better "driver's car". I don't know if you'll agree with that, but that was what the program said.

Currently, theres nothing BMW has (in the same class) that can rival the SLK32 in terms of performance (I think I'm right?!). Comparing the SLK32 to an M3 is just slightly unfair. They're different types of cars aimed at different types of drivers. I do disagree with the saying "the Z4 and the Boxter S are both crap cars". That is just wrong. They are both very good cars, just that you don't particularly like them.

Last but not least, I hope that the SLK55 with leave all the competition in dust. The R171 will be an amazing car to drive. Congrats to those who have already ordered one!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SLK/R171: New MB SLK-Class



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.