SLK-Class (R171) 2004-2010: SLK200K, SLK280, SLK350, SLK55, SLK55 Black Series

SLK/R171: Boxster S or SLK 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-07-2005, 06:47 PM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
WDRiley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 Porsche Cayman S
Boxster S or SLK 350

I am getting ready to order and I am still considering two cars; the Boxster S and the SLK 350
I need some input, and if you've owned a Boxster, so much the better.

TIA
Old 02-07-2005, 07:08 PM
  #2  
Almost a Member!
 
bigciti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Metro NYC area
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 BMW 330Ci Dinan Signiture series(S) SLK 350 6Spd. CAPRI BLUE AMG, Lighting pkg., heating pkg.
Don't know about the Boxster 'S'..but a friend of mine sold his year old 911 for an SLK350 after a test drive. He believes the 350 is an all around better engineered car than the Porsche. BTW he's owned several Porches incuding a Boxster in the past few years.
Old 02-07-2005, 10:06 PM
  #3  
Member
 
cjmegha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, Ca.
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1975 Ford Pinto
SLK55 all the way.....
Old 02-08-2005, 12:22 AM
  #4  
Newbie
 
alex_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Practically every car magazine rates the Boxster S as the top sports car in its category. That being said, I bought the SLK350 because the Boxster S is too expensive, and I didnt want to settle for the base boxster. Boxster S has perfect handling. And, although this is subjective, I think the Boxster has better looks. So, what I'm saying is if I had the extra cash I'd buy the Boxster S over the SLK350. Also, the exhaust note.....wow....now I feel like buying the car just to hear that engine sound every day of the week.




Old 02-08-2005, 12:36 AM
  #5  
Almost a Member!
 
bigciti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Metro NYC area
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 BMW 330Ci Dinan Signiture series(S) SLK 350 6Spd. CAPRI BLUE AMG, Lighting pkg., heating pkg.
You're right Alex, looks are subjective....I'm on the other side.(w/AMG pkg.) Concerning exhaust note, for about 2K you can upgrade to a Brabus quad....which will also boost HP.

Last edited by bigciti; 02-08-2005 at 12:46 AM.
Old 02-08-2005, 01:00 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
04E55 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04E55AMG, 05Dodge RAM 1500 Quad Cab, 02Montero Limited
If you are looking for performance Boxster S is the "No-Brainer" winner. If you are looking for a drop top that feels like a sedan than the new SLK. Even the SLK55 will not touch the handling of the mid-engine Porsche. Having owned a Boxster S, I can say that the car is so balanced.

Both great cars, it depends on your budget since the Boxster S is more $$$$ then the base SLK350.
Old 02-08-2005, 03:36 AM
  #7  
Member
 
steve-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newbury, UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W210 E320, SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by bigciti
Don't know about the Boxster 'S'..but a friend of mine sold his year old 911 for an SLK350 after a test drive. He believes the 350 is an all around better engineered car than the Porsche. BTW he's owned several Porches incuding a Boxster in the past few years.
Hmmmmm. That's a very strange conclusion. There's just no comparison between a 911 chassis and the SLK 350's relatively softly sprung one (even with the sports suspension). The engine, gearbox, transmission, brakes etc are the serious engineering that you are paying for with the Porsche, not the fancy heated headrests or elaborate cupholders. He obviously isn't a keen driver. I've owned several Porsches, a few BMWs, three Jags, three TVRs and a few other performance cars. I'm looking forward to getting my SLK55, but it sure isn't going to be a 911 as far as the driving experience goes.
Old 02-12-2005, 05:51 PM
  #8  
Almost a Member!
 
jono_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slk porsche argument

i got rid of a facelift 996 and got a slk350.

partly because of the cost and unreliability of the 996 - its engine blew up after 15k miles, but just out of warranty. it was squeaky, rattley and generally shabby for a £60k car.

a quick word on steering "feel". its a subject which makes motoring journalists weak at the knees so high is it exalted. yet i for one welcome the reduction in feel of the slk. the 911 had so much "feel" that it was impossible to drive for any distance without my hands feeling numb. the ride was rock solid and the crashing into potholes was something to be felt to be believed. i couldn't really relax whilst driving it, it was far too "jumpy". in reality there was almost no "sneeze" factor, built in. good for the track, not so good for the real world.

well one of the best feelings is getting out of the slk after a 300 mile journey comfortable and relaxed. something that was impossible in the 996. strangely no one has made these real world observations in any reviews i've seen.

the reliability of the 996 sucked too, yet everywhere i see people saying its the most reliable sports car on the market etc etc.

i can only go by my experience and my experience tells me the slk is a better bet than a porsche.

just my opinion....
Old 02-12-2005, 06:42 PM
  #9  
Member
 
MersAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes C32SC AMG
Originally Posted by WDRiley
I am getting ready to order and I am still considering two cars; the Boxster S and the SLK 350
I need some input, and if you've owned a Boxster, so much the better.

TIA
Boxter S of course! It does look good! Better than SLK...and its Porshce, and it has completely new remodeled interior! Porsche is the way to go!
Old 02-13-2005, 06:33 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
SLK55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
987S
If you need more help deciding heres a recent review from Car and Driver:

http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1
Old 02-13-2005, 07:30 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
miroj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WDRiley
I am getting ready to order and I am still considering two cars; the Boxster S and the SLK 350
I need some input, and if you've owned a Boxster, so much the better.

TIA
Lets say you want to change the oil for some reason and you are stuck in the middle of nowhere ..... im thinking that you wont have the tools to jack up the chassis and remove the carriage from the rails. The boxster is a sissy car. IT can only be driven in a city near some workshop, otherwise it is purely scrap metal.
Old 02-14-2005, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Newbie
 
alex_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only Boxster S > SLK350

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SLK/R171: Boxster S or SLK 350



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 PM.