SLK63 coming next year
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
SLK63 coming next year
Well, looks like we have confirmation of the SLK63 and it's coming next year. No word on power, but at least it's existence isn't a rumor anymore. This would be the fist mention of it on any documentation from Mercedes.
![](http://mysite.verizon.net/bfnnrgn/amgtimeline.jpg)
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
nope
Thats from a long time ago actually and has been posted before on a forum. Don't remember if it was this one.
After that was released ... AMG was repeated questioned if the 6.3 would come to the SLK. They have said no repeatedly.
Of course if it does ... awesome!
After that was released ... AMG was repeated questioned if the 6.3 would come to the SLK. They have said no repeatedly.
Of course if it does ... awesome!
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
![Frown](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kuwait City, Kuwait
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
G55 & SLK55
I am sad also, but to get close to the rumoured 420-450hp on the 6.2litre engine I guess 55 owners need Valve Springs, cam's, headers and an ecu update.
or you can go for the 6.1 S Brabus upgrade for 445hp/
or you can go for the 6.1 S Brabus upgrade for 445hp/
Trending Topics
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2011 Hyundai Elantra GLS
I do not think that is entirely correct. The SLK and C (203) shared front ends with the current CLK, where the 6.3 was fitted with no problem. I believe the SLK will soon be endowed with the 6.2L V8, and get a black-series like styling makeover.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
And for those who wants a little more power from the M113/M156, please contact EuroElites as EuroElites has now the capability of custom tuning (in house)
Cheers,
Adam
Last edited by AdamG@NorCal; 07-10-2007 at 04:00 PM.
#14
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK 55 Kleemann -06 Lotus Esprit V8 Biturbo -96 Harley Lowrider -06
#15
The sad part is that C63 and SLK63 cost roughly the same, while C63 has 120hp more. Tell me if I'm crazy, but that does not sound fair to me ![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
And with the new M3 coming out with 410hp, SLK55 needs to have 450hp minimum.
Do you have a dyno by any chance? How much hp at the wheels?
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
And with the new M3 coming out with 410hp, SLK55 needs to have 450hp minimum.
Do you have a dyno by any chance? How much hp at the wheels?
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
heh
The SLK does NOT need 450 hp. Look at the weight differential with the C63. The reality is that at anything over 400hp at the wheel the biggest problem is traction already.
If the SLK does come with around 400hp RWHP stock they better make a serious changes to allow greater traction.
If the SLK does come with around 400hp RWHP stock they better make a serious changes to allow greater traction.
#18
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 SLK55 AMG Iridium Silver
The SLK does NOT need 450 hp. Look at the weight differential with the C63. The reality is that at anything over 400hp at the wheel the biggest problem is traction already.
If the SLK does come with around 400hp RWHP stock they better make a serious changes to allow greater traction.
If the SLK does come with around 400hp RWHP stock they better make a serious changes to allow greater traction.
#19
The SLK does NOT need 450 hp. Look at the weight differential with the C63. The reality is that at anything over 400hp at the wheel the biggest problem is traction already.
If the SLK does come with around 400hp RWHP stock they better make a serious changes to allow greater traction.
If the SLK does come with around 400hp RWHP stock they better make a serious changes to allow greater traction.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
AdamG, its true you can upgrade it no problem... i just think that for $63,000 MSRP, it should have the 6.2L engine just like C63. Why should it get a lesser engine? That 5.5L V8 is like a decade old, c'mon...
P.S. I'm kinda tired of hearing the "6.2L engine was not meant for the SLK, it doesn't fit.. bla bla bla" R171 is an 2005 model, Mercedes should've thought about making the 6.2L engine fit during its development. Keep in mind that C and CLK bodies are much older, so there really isnt any excuse to be made here...
Last edited by Tuskir; 07-11-2007 at 01:26 AM.
#20
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#22
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK 55 AMG
I disagree, 300-400lb's is quite a lot of weight (10-15% lighter is a big deal in a car), and the 63 engine is lighter then the current 55.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
#25
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK 55 Kleemann -06 Lotus Esprit V8 Biturbo -96 Harley Lowrider -06
The sad part is that C63 and SLK63 cost roughly the same, while C63 has 120hp more. Tell me if I'm crazy, but that does not sound fair to me ![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
And with the new M3 coming out with 410hp, SLK55 needs to have 450hp minimum.
Do you have a dyno by any chance? How much hp at the wheels?
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
And with the new M3 coming out with 410hp, SLK55 needs to have 450hp minimum.
Do you have a dyno by any chance? How much hp at the wheels?
![](http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/502/bromsprovslket6.jpg)