getting ready for DYNO
NEW OIL CHANGE: ENGINE+ TRANNY
GOING TO REMOVE THE PLUG ON THE ESP/ABS BOX
SOFT RESET: WILL THIS HELP?
DYNO ON 4TH GEAR
PUT THE SHIFTER LEVER ON
DO WE HAVE TO PRESS THE PEDAL UP TO THE KICKDOWN BUTTON?
3700RPM THEN FULL WOT?
ill be dynoing the car before getting it retuned by a friend so we can see the gains with the new tune. thanks
GOING TO REMOVE THE PLUG ON THE ESP/ABS BOX - I really don't beleive you will see any lossnor gain.
SOFT RESET: WILL THIS HELP? I would not recomend doing this as it will take some time for your car to re-adapt the best tune
DYNO ON 4TH GEAR - This will be fine
PUT THE SHIFTER LEVER ON - I don't know what you mean by on.
DO WE HAVE TO PRESS THE PEDAL UP TO THE KICKDOWN BUTTON?
3700RPM THEN FULL WOT? While in 4th gear they will tell you accelarate and you will just push the pedal to the floor and go thru 4th gear to redline.
Hope this helps maybe some others can chime in with there 2cents
ill be dynoing the car before getting it retuned by a friend so we can see the gains with the new tune. thanks
Soft reset then 20 min of aggressive driving will actually help b/c it makes sure the most aggressive settings are used.
Its much easier to dyno the car in 3rd on the older 722.6s, I know its not the ideal gear but you can start the car much sooner (sometimes as early as 3000-3500). But again its up to you, 4th gear the car will want to downshift alot. Also, some dynos force you to use lower gears since there are MPH limits on certain dynos as well.
Trending Topics
it should be a quick swap and could give us a clue on what kind of gains are possible from this mod alone.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
my specs:
kleemann headers
twin 2.5 inch piping
1st and 2nd cat delete
x pipe
renntech airbox
sprintbooster
kleemann ecu
twin 2.5 inch race reso
the tuner said i was running rich on te kleeman ecu so were going to re tune the car ill get it dynod again next week after the tune . also do you think i oversized the pipings? should i bring it back to 2.25 inch? then 2.5 inch X pipe with out reso then ill move the X pipe closer to the engine?? what do you guys think? thanks
Did you disconnect the ABS/ESP sensor behind the drivers side headlight when you did the dyno?
I told you 4th gear would be almost impossible to do, 3rd gear is much easier on our cars and the HP results are almost exactly the same so for the purposes of measuring power it will suffice even though technically its not 1:1.
Your numbers are low for sure. It may indicate your ECU maybe pulling timing due to improper tune for your specific setup. That may also explain the breaking up on the top end. 291HP = 354 crank on dyno jet which is low for the mods listed. Also your TQ numbers are low b/c of the 4000+ rpm, you couldn't get into peak torque. If you get the crank pulley it will be much easier to start at lower rpm (due to increase in low end to mid range torque). Typically you can start anywhere between 3000-3500 in 3rd gear (usually by 3350rpm you can go WOT in 3rd on dyno and it will hold gear with that setup).
Another issue to consider, you may be experiencing torque loss due to the larger 2.5" dual exhausts and no cats, your back pressure is extremely low which may be hurting your torque numbers as well (this may also explain why the tranny keeps wanting to downshift b/c there isn't enough low end torque to power it in the current gear). Our transmissions & ECUs are much smarter than most people realize, it is actually measuring the output from the engine and adjusts the shifts accordingly, so if you are low on torque, it will always downshift to lower gear. The more torque you have, the less tendency it will have to downshift. As an example, I can go WOT in 3rd as low as 2000-2500rpm (minus kick down pedal of course) depending on conditions and it will hold the gear and accelerate due to the abundance of low end to mid range torque.
You may want to do a B&G full injector cleaning service you can easily pick up alot of lost HP this way as well if you have really dirty fuel system (it will also clean up the combustion cylinder as well). This could potentially be another reason you are breaking up top. Although ignition system is usually blamed for poor spark, honestly with Coil-on-dual plugs per cylinder its usually not ignition that is the problem with these AMG motors. Its more than likely a air/fuel issue (often due to improper tune for any given specific setup).
The closest you can really put the X-pipe to the headers is where the 2nd cats are and thats only 3 feet in front of the stock resonator location which honestly probably won't make a huge difference. You may see a gain of 1-3HP more (if that), but don't expect anything huge.
Hope that helps,
~AMS~
Last edited by AMS Performance; Oct 21, 2009 at 04:04 PM.
You may simply be pushing too much air up on the top end and the ECU is pulling timing to full retard in order to prevent detonation with so much air flow at higher rpms. BTW, I have seen cars dyno 20-30HP less just from a bad tune, so keep that in mind. Our ECUs are VERY sensitive to proper tuning due to their high adaptability.
Hope that helps.
Last edited by pinoyk20; Oct 21, 2009 at 04:17 PM.
you should of done a stock baseline for a proper comparison. i'm willing to bet that all your mods combined gave you less than 10whp, which is why i've always said that these motors are very well tuned from the factory and except for the headers which probably help by removing the pre cats and actually gain you a few whp, you're only getting increased noise, not necessarily increased performance.
the only way to make significantly more power out of a N/A AMG motor is either F/I or agressive cams+headers+custom tuning(and even this would probably cost $$$$ and gain 30-40whp at best).
sorry guys but claims of 40-50 whp gains from a crank pulley, headers and x-pipe are just not going to happen on the N/A 55 motor, no matter what some vendors are going to tell you.
the TUNE i got is an off the shelf tune. im getting it re tuned agained to match my engine set up. thanks im targetting to get only 310-320whp on our dyno here
do you think theres an effect on the increase of pipe size on my exhaust stock is 2.25 i made it 2.5 inch but the shop said thats the outer size of pipe the inner coul g0 from 2.3-2.4inch
also after the tune im going to let it addapt firts to see if there a changes on the power if there are none im going to put back my stock exhat piping but install the race reso nd X pipe on it. thanks
The reason he is killing is power is he took too much out and changed too much, these engines need back pressure to function properly, if you take that out you could easily kill HP especially with larger piping which is why I always recommend to our customers never to touch the stock exhaust piping. With headers, pulley & cats you can easily get 40 crank HP, and with a few additional mods on top of that you can get to the 50HP mark without doing cams & etc. In addition, the Kleemann headers are not the best design. Their primaries are way too small (only 1.5" tri-Y) and they do very little to low end / mid range.
A common trend that seems to be appearing is most software tunes are actually doing more harm than good and as a result the ECU can easily kill power because of an improper tune. You are better off sticking with stock software and doing all the hardware modifications than vice versa.
there was one e46 m3 fully built with groupe m exhaust, intake, ecu etc.. that dynoed 270whp at 225tq on the dyno. si i guess our dynojet reads really low. an E39 M5 with full exhaust, intake ECU etc.. dynoed only 315whp and 341tq
my specs:
kleemann headers
twin 2.5 inch piping
1st and 2nd cat delete
x pipe
renntech airbox
sprintbooster
kleemann ecu
twin 2.5 inch race reso
the tuner said i was running rich on te kleeman ecu so were going to re tune the car ill get it dynod again next week after the tune . also do you think i oversized the pipings? should i bring it back to 2.25 inch? then 2.5 inch X pipe with out reso then ill move the X pipe closer to the engine?? what do you guys think? thanks







