W210 AMG Discuss the W210 AMG's such as the E50, E55, and E60
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E55 vs E320 check this out!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-16-2003, 03:39 PM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
c32god's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C240
E55 vs E320 check this out!!

my friend told me he read in a road&track (i think it was that) that the E320 sport package handles better than a E55 AMG, hows that possible?
Old 03-16-2003, 05:41 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
300ce
.....................I don't think that is true. I think the problem is that the E55 is so incredibly fast many magazine articles comment that it is scary to drive.

Ted
Old 03-16-2003, 05:50 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
JohnAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 782
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
3 Porsche rotation
I don't think that is possible also. The E-class Sport package is only comestic and no modification to the suspension therefore it handle just like any other E-class.

John
Old 03-16-2003, 08:07 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The sport package includes the following:

Includes Bi-Xenon headlamps, headlamp washers, Black Birds Eye maple trim on doors, dash and center console, blue tinted glass, LED brake lights, sculpted side skirts, restyled front apron, rear apron, 17" sport wheels and P245/45R17 tires.

I seriously doubt that the xenons, maple trim, aprons and sport wheels will affect handling.
The tires on the E55 will be higher rated than the sport package tires.


Someone's very mistaken.
Old 03-16-2003, 08:15 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
MarcusBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: House of Imports, MBZ (So. Cali.)
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'06 ML500 w/Apperance pkg & '07 SL550 w/AMG pkg
You are leaving out one very important part of the Sport Pkg. It also includes the Airmatic II DC suspension. This will be standard equipment in the E55 with just a little AMG tweaking!! That is the reason most car magz. are stating that about the handling being similar.
Old 03-17-2003, 02:31 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
muhri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 962
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
'18 AMG GTR '16 BMW M3 - '05 Porsche Carrera S
Its only in the US and maybe Canada where Airmatic DC is part of the sports package (Avantgarde elsewhere) - For the Avantgarde models you get a regular sports suspension (Not air) ... However, you get the Air suspnesion with the E55 and 500 only elsewhere as standard. Just FYI.. I don't think However, that the handling of a regular vs AMG would be better.. No way. I have an Avantgarde with the sports suspension and 18" AMG wheels and it handles like a dream but I'm sure that the E55 will handle 10 times better.
Old 03-17-2003, 10:10 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
E55 KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,530
Received 198 Likes on 156 Posts
2016 GLE63s / 2016 E63s / 2002 E55
Does your friend know the difference between handling and ride?

Originally posted by c32god
my friend told me he read in a road&track (i think it was that) that the E320 sport package handles better than a E55 AMG, hows that possible?
Maybe the magazine writer or your friend was referring to 'Ride Quality' as in comfort or suppleness. E55's are not designed for comfort or suppleness. E55's are hard and tight handling performance cars with luxury features.

If you want complete luxury with supple comfortable ride you don't buy an E55.
Old 03-18-2003, 10:23 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dave OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
R170
Road and Track said that the skidpad numbers were higher for the 320 than the 55
Old 03-19-2003, 03:09 AM
  #9  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
c32god's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C240
see, dave oh said, so what is that all about? hows that possible?
Old 03-19-2003, 04:30 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
mikE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 AMG
Actually, it's the March '03 issue of Car&Driver that tested both the E55 and E320. The E55 pulled .83 g's and the E320 w/sport package pulled .84 g's. These were separate tests, so call them about even. (The E320 won the comparison test, with the BMW 530i coming in second, Audi A6 3rd, Lexus, Infinity, Lincoln, and the Jag bringing up the rears.)

BUT, the w210 E55 consitently pulls .90 g's on the skidpad. So I'm quite dissapointed with the .83 result of the new E55. I just don't get it either. Maybe the new E55 is just meant to be a land cruiser missle.
Old 03-19-2003, 05:59 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Finnish C32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W211 E55AMG
The big reason for those w211 e55 skidpad numbers is rear tires. They are MO-marked (Mercedes Only) which means EXTREMELY soft sideline. 19" rims with Pirelli P-Zero Neros and the whole car is different
Old 03-19-2003, 06:53 AM
  #12  
Super Member
 
muhri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 962
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
'18 AMG GTR '16 BMW M3 - '05 Porsche Carrera S
Originally posted by Finnish C32
The big reason for those w211 e55 skidpad numbers is rear tires. They are MO-marked (Mercedes Only) which means EXTREMELY soft sideline. 19" rims with Pirelli P-Zero Neros and the whole car is different
You must be the first delivery on this borad for an E55 - PICS please !!
Old 03-21-2003, 12:17 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMG99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
Posts: 3,445
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1951 Caterpiller D6
My guess is that the combination of weight (400lbs), air suspension and poor tires are causing the dismal numbers. I saw Continetal mentioned in more than one review instead of the more capable Michelin Pilots. That alone could be worth .05g
Old 03-21-2003, 01:31 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dave OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
R170
Pilots aren't really the grippiest of tires...
First mod for my W211 E55 will be some Bridgestone S-03's
Old 03-21-2003, 03:15 AM
  #15  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
c32god's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C240
ok now i understand, thanx alot for the info, im really starting to like this forum site
Old 03-21-2003, 07:05 AM
  #16  
Super Member
 
hinhin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MB
So, probably for those who will pretty soon have their W211 E55 ready for delivery, should consider paying
$76,000 base price
$-------- optional package
$ 600 rear tires


:-)
Old 03-21-2003, 12:10 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMG99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
Posts: 3,445
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1951 Caterpiller D6
The Michelin Pilot Sport tires may not be the "grippiest" but they provide an excellent balance between wet/dry roadholding, ride, noise and wear. The first thing I did to my '99 E55 was put on a set of S02s. They wore out in 8K miles. I switched back to the Pilots and got 22K miles. I could have gone longer but I cut a sidewall and decided to replace them all. The difference in grip was barely noticable in street driving conditions.

Either tire will outperform the Continental if that is what was tested on the '03 E55. The choice boils down to how much are you willing to pay for that extra grip?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E55 vs E320 check this out!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 PM.