E55 vs Cayenne
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 369
Likes: 22
From: USA
S550
E55 vs Cayenne
I have ordered a Cayenne Turbo, but have been reading about alot of quality issues with it, such as excessive oil consumpation, bad tire wear, leaking panoroof, etc. The E55 has the power, and plenty of luxury, and storage space. Will any changes be made in 2006? Any thoghts on the E 55?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
2015 C63 AMG 507
I enjoyed my Cayenne Turbo for about 7K miles. I did have to add a quart of oil about every 1500-2000 miles. Also, THOUROUGHLY test drive on the freeway at speeds of about 60-80mph. Make sure the vehicle you purchase does not have a steering wheel vibration. Let go of the wheel briefly at these speeds and watch for a shimmy in the steering wheel. My .02, overall, a killer vehicle. Is this the new 500hp model, or are they still at 450hp? I like my E55 waaaaay better, I like the torque, and speed that you just cant get from an SUV. Still lots of passenger room, but the Turbo's interior and standard features can not be beat!!!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 369
Likes: 22
From: USA
S550
Originally Posted by Duane
Hey Doc its Duane. Good to see you over here. I just got my e55 2 days ago. Knowing how you are you should jus get both.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 369
Likes: 22
From: USA
S550
Originally Posted by Noredline
I enjoyed my Cayenne Turbo for about 7K miles. I did have to add a quart of oil about every 1500-2000 miles. Also, THOUROUGHLY test drive on the freeway at speeds of about 60-80mph. Make sure the vehicle you purchase does not have a steering wheel vibration. Let go of the wheel briefly at these speeds and watch for a shimmy in the steering wheel. My .02, overall, a killer vehicle. Is this the new 500hp model, or are they still at 450hp? I like my E55 waaaaay better, I like the torque, and speed that you just cant get from an SUV. Still lots of passenger room, but the Turbo's interior and standard features can not be beat!!!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
2015 C63 AMG 507
Honestly, they handle about the same. I am not dissappointed with the handling of the 55, much better with PS2's vs. the stock Contis. The Cayenne when lowered (manually, or automatically at like 85mph) really corners well at speeds. I have taken both vehicles on the same freeway interchanges over 100 and can easily change lanes.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu
I've had both cars in my garage at one point, and now only have one...the E55! I had to add a quart of oil once at the 3300 mi point, but after owning a 993, 996 Porsche turbo models, I'm used to it.
If you need the extra space (not much, actually) over the E55...then the Cayenne should be your pick. But to me, the lower cost of an e55, way faster (e55), and better handling (e55)...made me decide to go with the E55 as my daily driver.
If you need the extra space (not much, actually) over the E55...then the Cayenne should be your pick. But to me, the lower cost of an e55, way faster (e55), and better handling (e55)...made me decide to go with the E55 as my daily driver.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
From: Toronto,ON
AMG
Originally Posted by onesixeight
I've had both cars in my garage at one point, and now only have one...the E55! I had to add a quart of oil once at the 3300 mi point, but after owning a 993, 996 Porsche turbo models, I'm used to it.
If you need the extra space (not much, actually) over the E55...then the Cayenne should be your pick. But to me, the lower cost of an e55, way faster (e55), and better handling (e55)...made me decide to go with the E55 as my daily driver.
If you need the extra space (not much, actually) over the E55...then the Cayenne should be your pick. But to me, the lower cost of an e55, way faster (e55), and better handling (e55)...made me decide to go with the E55 as my daily driver.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by BoBcanada
Which one consumed more petrol? Cayenne turbo or E55?
I noticed in the city (where I do most of my driving), the Cayenne averaged like 8.8 mpg! No joke. Believe it or not, Hawaii (Honolulu) has some of the worst traffic...seriously parking lot type stop and go.
But on the highway, the extra 6th gear on the Cayenne highway consumption to a more reasonable 23-24 mpg.
If I don't reset the On Board Computer for a week, I notice both cars at the end come out pretty close on consumption...11.4-12.5 mpg for both cars. A week of normal driving-no crazy runs or torque wrenching E55 burn-outs!
Now that's something you can't do with the Cayenne TT!!!
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 11
From: United States
04 E55
Buyer Beware!!!!
As others have stated do yourself a favor and take a long test drive of the unit that you are actually going to own; no demos or loaners; your actual C TT.
In November PCNA repurchased my C - S prior to Lemon Law Litigation; the vibration issue is a real problem and there is no known remedy?
In the end that E55 in my mind has as much unique appeal as the Cayenne; both need snow tyres and premium fuel; and consumption is close to even.
In November PCNA repurchased my C - S prior to Lemon Law Litigation; the vibration issue is a real problem and there is no known remedy?
In the end that E55 in my mind has as much unique appeal as the Cayenne; both need snow tyres and premium fuel; and consumption is close to even.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
2005 Mercedes C-Class
Originally Posted by TestnDoc
I have ordered a Cayenne Turbo, but have been reading about alot of quality issues with it, such as excessive oil consumpation, bad tire wear, leaking panoroof, etc. The E55 has the power, and plenty of luxury, and storage space. Will any changes be made in 2006? Any thoghts on the E 55?
If I will have to choose between Cayenne TT and E55, I will take Cayenne!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by W210
E55>ctt>645
If you're only gonna buy one car and don't need the extra cargo capacity of the C-TT, then the E55 is an easy choice. It's cheaper by 10-15k with similar options, handles better, way faster acceleration...and to me...looks better.
But to some of my friends that have one, just owning the world's fastest SUV is enough for them to pick the C-TT.
I'm a fan of the 6-series and think it's a great GT car, but I'd still take the E55.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
Originally Posted by onesixeight
I agree with you W210...
If you're only gonna buy one car and don't need the extra cargo capacity of the C-TT, then the E55 is an easy choice. It's cheaper by 10-15k with similar options, handles better, way faster acceleration...and to me...looks better.
But to some of my friends that have one, just owning the world's fastest SUV is enough for them to pick the C-TT.
I'm a fan of the 6-series and think it's a great GT car, but I'd still take the E55.
If you're only gonna buy one car and don't need the extra cargo capacity of the C-TT, then the E55 is an easy choice. It's cheaper by 10-15k with similar options, handles better, way faster acceleration...and to me...looks better.
But to some of my friends that have one, just owning the world's fastest SUV is enough for them to pick the C-TT.
I'm a fan of the 6-series and think it's a great GT car, but I'd still take the E55.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by W210
I would definitely pick a C-TT if money is no object and I need an SUV, although on a straight line, perhaps the G55K is faster?
The G-wagens really shows it age when you drive it, even the AMG model. Driving the Cayenne is a vastly different driving experience, especially since it's a much more modern SUV, build completely new from the ground up.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
You're right about the initial surge, Motor Trend tested the G55k at 4.7(!) 0-60, while the CTT did it in 5.1. 1/4 mile G55k at 13.2@103.2, CTT at 13.6@101.8.
I can't imagine how much the G55k would cost in Singapore.
Food for thought, if they can combine 4matic with the V8k engine in the G55k, why not the E55k!
I can't imagine how much the G55k would cost in Singapore.
Food for thought, if they can combine 4matic with the V8k engine in the G55k, why not the E55k!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by W210
You're right about the initial surge, Motor Trend tested the G55k at 4.7(!) 0-60, while the CTT did it in 5.1. 1/4 mile G55k at 13.2@103.2, CTT at 13.6@101.8.
I can't imagine how much the G55k would cost in Singapore.
Food for thought, if they can combine 4matic with the V8k engine in the G55k, why not the E55k!
I can't imagine how much the G55k would cost in Singapore.
Food for thought, if they can combine 4matic with the V8k engine in the G55k, why not the E55k!
I believe the G-Wagen SUV sells for around $300k USD in Singapore, not to mention the extremely high taxes based on the size of your engine. :p :p :p
Regarding the 4-Matic...I thought with the release of the E55 Estate in the US we would see a 4-Matic version of that...but I guess it didn't make the boat. Maybe that's a closer comparison to the Cayenne TT...A 4-Matic E55 Estate.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 14
From: Houston, Texas - USA
2009 C63 AMG
My vote is the E55 hands down. You think its fun to have a fast SUV? You should see the faces on people when you blow them away in a 4 door Mercedes. If cargo is important to you, how about the E55 wagon? Talk about total stealth mode.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
2011 Porsche Carrera GTS, 2009 BMW 750Li, 2011 Ferrari 458, 2011 SLS AMG, 2012 C63 AMG BS
Had an 03 E55 for a little while. Have had a Cayenne turbo since November 2003. There is no better SUV than a CT. If you need an SUV, that's the car. If you don't then the E55 is a little less expensive (actually not really since you can get brand new ones for a hefty discount and E55's are pretty much going at MSRP). I have replaced my E55 with a CLS55.
The CT has a much more luxurious interior (full nappa leather everywhere and alcantara headliner) and with better seats for me. I have a ECU upgrade and air filter and its making about 500hp. I would never sell it until they come out with a new version of it. Great driving position and very quiet inside. I like my CLS55 for its faster speed and active dynamic seats and all the electronic toys, but the CT is a great car with a lot of utility for my needs.
All depends on what's important to you.
The CT has a much more luxurious interior (full nappa leather everywhere and alcantara headliner) and with better seats for me. I have a ECU upgrade and air filter and its making about 500hp. I would never sell it until they come out with a new version of it. Great driving position and very quiet inside. I like my CLS55 for its faster speed and active dynamic seats and all the electronic toys, but the CT is a great car with a lot of utility for my needs.
All depends on what's important to you.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 53
From: Georgia
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
Agree...but how bout that vibration thing....
I just bought another 04 S, and have some of the 80ish MPH vibration. I thought it was in need of two tires, but can't quite convince myself of that. cna someone point me to some board discussion of the vibration issue? BTW, if this was my dilemma, no question:
I'd buy the E55 wagon. A set of 19" wheels and the Renntech software and no one coud catch me, even if they could figure out what it was...
I'd buy the E55 wagon. A set of 19" wheels and the Renntech software and no one coud catch me, even if they could figure out what it was...
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
E55
I thought a lot about the Ctt before getting the E55. The Cayenne has a lot going for it. I like its look -- quite distinctive. It has all wheel drive. You ride high so you can see where the gaps are in traffic and find the right lane to go fast. The test drive was a lot of fun. The displays are color. It is easier to carry a dog.
I bought the E because of the better acceleration and because of the unreliability rumors of hte Ctt. It pulled Porsche from near the top of JD Powers to near hte bottom. Also the MB dealership is close by and I know hte people there.
I bought the E because of the better acceleration and because of the unreliability rumors of hte Ctt. It pulled Porsche from near the top of JD Powers to near hte bottom. Also the MB dealership is close by and I know hte people there.
