W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More E63 gossip...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-05-2005, 07:33 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,929
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
06 SL65 / 97 993tt /11 Suburban/ 2012 GTR (AMG è la mia Famiglia la Bestia è la mia protezione)
More E63 gossip...

I popped my head into the dealership today after dropping off a car at the service shop and asked about the new AMG motor and like most of the gossip all my rep told me was that they expect the engine to be a N/A 500hp engine. I asked him about the torque and hinted at a close to 600 ft/lbs.

However, he doesn't expect the the lates AMG engine variant to get into the E until MY 2007. The AMG engine will roll out first in the ML, then the S/CL, and then the E. Also, I got to see the CLS55 up close and it is stunning in person (I even got used to the rear end), but he said I should wait for the new engine before I jump into another AMG.

The speculation continues...
Old 04-05-2005, 11:38 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
wow 600 ft of trq from a 6.3? intresting... now they need to work on better suspension and rev limiter to a 7000 rpms! Or 9 lol
Old 04-06-2005, 01:43 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Evolution Marine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 CLS55-030, 2002 BMW 540 Wagon, 1995 VW Jetta GLX
Thumbs down 600 lb. ft. N/A!!!

NEVER EVER happen with only 6.3 Liters of N/A displacement on pump gas in a warranted luxury sports sedan. For argument sake, if you take the new BMW M5 motor which puts out about 385 lb.ft. of torque and is about as sophisticated as you can get and apply a straight line assumption that the new MB 6.3 motor will put out relatively the same amount of touque per liter, the torque on the new MB motor would be about 485 lb. ft.. This sounds more realistic, however if the 6.3 is pressurized then no problem getting 600 lb. ft. of torque. - Bob
Old 04-06-2005, 02:05 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
http://autoweek.com/printwindow.cms?...&pageType=news

this says somthign about 440 ft of trq
Old 04-06-2005, 04:51 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
reggid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Originally Posted by Evolution Marine
NEVER EVER happen with only 6.3 Liters of N/A displacement on pump gas in a warranted luxury sports sedan. For argument sake, if you take the new BMW M5 motor which puts out about 385 lb.ft. of torque and is about as sophisticated as you can get and apply a straight line assumption that the new MB 6.3 motor will put out relatively the same amount of touque per liter, the torque on the new MB motor would be about 485 lb. ft.. This sounds more realistic, however if the 6.3 is pressurized then no problem getting 600 lb. ft. of torque. - Bob
Well said! at least someone thinks about what they read/hear

yes a good guide for NA is 100Nm/L (74lbft/L) across all priced vehicles and maybe 110 for a highly tuned car such as an M3
Old 04-06-2005, 07:12 AM
  #6  
Out Of Control!!
 
Can Drive 55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,266
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 E55
I don't know what everyone else's experiences are, but in my case, I usually believe just the opposite of what any car sales person tells me. They seem to be the dumbest people in business and know less about cars than anyone. As a rule, I disregard anything they say.
Old 04-06-2005, 08:50 AM
  #7  
Member
 
gobiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 76
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C32 AMG
Wow, found these:

http://www.wheels24.co.za/Wheels24/...1505038,00.html

http://forums1.roadfly.org/mercedes...=4872274&page=1

Looks like there'll be a S69, CL69 and SL69! In excess of 675 Bhp.
Plus I read in an article that the CLS65 will debut at the Paris Motor Show in Sept.

Looks like a horsepower arms race, Mercedes against itself.
Old 04-06-2005, 09:48 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
AMGfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,929
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
06 SL65 / 97 993tt /11 Suburban/ 2012 GTR (AMG è la mia Famiglia la Bestia è la mia protezione)
Like I said, the speculation continues and I just plan to sit tight and enjoy the "known" 516 fl/lbs I got right now...
Old 04-06-2005, 10:16 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
corgiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
I think the new AMG engine will be coming soon - I think it's one reason why they haven't bothered to fix the SC squeak. It's too costly on an engine that will be going out of production s

I tried the valve grinding compound which did silence the squeak BTW.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: More E63 gossip...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 AM.