videooo m5
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
2010 ZR1 2011 JGC Overland 2013 ML63 on order
Yeah that M6 pulled the M5 really well.
Supposedly it's the first car with a Carbon Fiber Roof from the factory.
that's badass
Would like to see one run against a new Z06 from a roll
Supposedly it's the first car with a Carbon Fiber Roof from the factory.
that's badassWould like to see one run against a new Z06 from a roll
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
New Mercedes-AMG SUVs Arrive With NEW V8 Engine: 12 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production
Verdad Gallardo
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
W221 S65 AMG
can't wait to see some 1/4 times...not mag 1/4 times....if the E55 is a low 12 car and IF the new M5 really can beat the E55 by 4-5 cars from that one video this damn M6 may give the Z06 a run for its money. It wouldn't suprise me if it runs 122 mph through the 1/4.
Almost a Member!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by E552006
Something does not make sense here. There is only about 150lbs diff btwn the 2 cars. Although the M5 had a passenger..so make that 330.
Maybe I'm missing something because the carmags are reporting times for the M6 that are close to SL 65 times in the 0-200 kph runs.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 383
2005 E55
Originally Posted by wolverine
I agree - something doesn't quite make sense. The M6 is only 180 lbs lighter than the M5, and actually has a slightly worse Cd. Same engine, same tranny. Doesn't seem like 180 lb would make that much of a difference. Maybe I'm missing something because the carmags are reporting times for the M6 that are close to SL 65 times in the 0-200 kph runs.
Maybe I'm missing something because the carmags are reporting times for the M6 that are close to SL 65 times in the 0-200 kph runs.
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Socal
06' Clk 500 Cabriolet, 01' CL 55, 00' Clk 430
Originally Posted by wolverine
I agree - something doesn't quite make sense. The M6 is only 180 lbs lighter than the M5, and actually has a slightly worse Cd. Same engine, same tranny. Doesn't seem like 180 lb would make that much of a difference. Maybe I'm missing something because the carmags are reporting times for the M6 that are close to SL 65 times in the 0-200 kph runs.
Maybe I'm missing something because the carmags are reporting times for the M6 that are close to SL 65 times in the 0-200 kph runs.
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
2005 E55 Black
Originally Posted by Mardeth
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 53
From: Georgia
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
And the E46 M3 CSL....
already has a carbon fiber roof panel. Man that V8 M3 in the E90 is going to be wicked...
