CLS55 vs M5 vs STS-V Scan
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
CLS55 vs M5 vs STS-V Scan
If this is a repost, then sorry...
The rest of the scans here:
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=63397
The rest of the scans here:
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=63397
Last edited by EKaru; 12-07-2005 at 11:20 PM.
#2
Super Member
Thread Starter
http://img370.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10vi.jpg
http://img521.imageshack.us/my.php?image=29wv.jpg
http://img521.imageshack.us/my.php?image=31ha.jpg
http://img454.imageshack.us/my.php?image=44fr.jpg
http://img357.imageshack.us/my.php?image=53fb.jpg
http://img219.imageshack.us/my.php?image=66gy.jpg
http://img40.imageshack.us/my.php?image=79ud.jpg
http://img521.imageshack.us/my.php?image=29wv.jpg
http://img521.imageshack.us/my.php?image=31ha.jpg
http://img454.imageshack.us/my.php?image=44fr.jpg
http://img357.imageshack.us/my.php?image=53fb.jpg
http://img219.imageshack.us/my.php?image=66gy.jpg
http://img40.imageshack.us/my.php?image=79ud.jpg
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
It's surprising to read the heavier CLS having significantly better skidpad numbers than the M5 with identical tire size.
It would have been interesting to read how the M5 would compare in Auto mode in the top gear acceleration run. Right now, it's meaningless to compare the mid-range acceleration between the 3 cars.
Also, the scan on M5 board is the same as posted above, no additional scanned pages.
It would have been interesting to read how the M5 would compare in Auto mode in the top gear acceleration run. Right now, it's meaningless to compare the mid-range acceleration between the 3 cars.
Also, the scan on M5 board is the same as posted above, no additional scanned pages.
#5
Super Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by IanSL55
... not to mention we rule in the GAS MILEAGE catagory!
~ Ian
~ Ian
Unfortunately not for long when MB goes DOHC... I doubt the 6.2 will be as economical as the induced 5.4...
Eric...
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
i would love to see a head to head of the E55...
i would think the 1/4 mile and to 100 would be pulling with the M5...
after 115mph+ the M5 will take it over the duties of pulling..
also a K1/EvoSport Stage1 race would be cool... as mentioned hundreds of times... we wonder if a simple pulley and chip E would be able to put a better fight after 120mph.
K2 cars are well documented to run 11.5xx to 11.88 at 12xmph... i think they have nothing to worried about.
i would think the 1/4 mile and to 100 would be pulling with the M5...
after 115mph+ the M5 will take it over the duties of pulling..
also a K1/EvoSport Stage1 race would be cool... as mentioned hundreds of times... we wonder if a simple pulley and chip E would be able to put a better fight after 120mph.
K2 cars are well documented to run 11.5xx to 11.88 at 12xmph... i think they have nothing to worried about.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have two W211 E55 vs E60 M5 runs scheduled after the spring thaw here in Chicago. That is, unless I find myself a CLS55 at which point they will turn into a C219 CLS55 vs E60 M5 runs
-m
-m