AMG headers vs Renntech Headers
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
nice
Originally Posted by Rock
What is your opinion on Renntech compared to the Kleemann?
Kleemann vs stock below.
Kleemann vs stock below.
#27
Originally Posted by rflow306
You would be surprised how much power you can pick up with a 4 into three header.
Originally Posted by rflow306
In my opinion the ss long tubes will make most power with nitrous, jet for jet.
Are you familiar with a gentleman by the name of Ed Henneman? He runs a company called Headers By "Ed." He has been designing and building headers for over 40 years. Over the years he has proven by controlled tests that equal-length, 4-into-1 headers with the correct tube and collector sizes always produce the most power. Bar none. His web site is headersbyed.com. If you have an hour or so of spare time, he's an interesting read. He really rips into the car magazines, their personnel, and their testing methodologies.
#28
Out Of Control!!
What do you guys think of Supersprint Headers? I talked to them and I was told that all emmisions equipment remains on the car, making them street legal. I am not sure where the primary cats go, as the headers look pretty long to me. He estimated a 50 HP gain w/o any programing of the ECU. the cost from their web site is
MSRP $5,297.12
Your Price: $3,807.30
MSRP $5,297.12
Your Price: $3,807.30
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ventura County USA
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
The long equal length tubes should do wonders for torque, but there's no way they keep the primary cats from looking at the picture. No way they are legal, just like the Kleemann headers, at least in Ca.
UPDATE: Their site specifically says they are NOT legal, and not intended for street or highway use.
UPDATE: Their site specifically says they are NOT legal, and not intended for street or highway use.
Last edited by Fast55; 05-25-2006 at 04:28 PM.
#30
Out Of Control!!
Originally Posted by Fast55
The long equal length tubes should do wonders for torque, but there's no way they keep the primary cats from looking at the picture. No way they are legal, just like the Kleemann headers, at least in Ca.
UPDATE: Their site specifically says they are NOT legal, and not intended for street or highway use.
UPDATE: Their site specifically says they are NOT legal, and not intended for street or highway use.
#31
Originally Posted by can drive 55
What do you guys think of Supersprint Headers? I talked to them and I was told that all emmisions equipment remains on the car, making them street legal. I am not sure where the primary cats go, as the headers look pretty long to me. He estimated a 50 HP gain w/o any programing of the ECU. the cost from their web site is
MSRP $5,297.12
Your Price: $3,807.30
MSRP $5,297.12
Your Price: $3,807.30
#32
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Based on the pics I am looking at they dont look like Tri-Y headers.. There are 4 independent tubes running down into an input pipe at the collector. There are 4 distinct input pipes at the collector so they do seem to be equal length long tube headers.
The Tri-Y design would have 2 of the pipes merging before the collector.. Or am I completely wrong on this??
The Tri-Y design would have 2 of the pipes merging before the collector.. Or am I completely wrong on this??
Originally Posted by Grumpy666
These are the headers I was referring to in my post above. They are a Tri-Y design (4-into-2-into-1). They are not equal length. From a performance perspective, I would rate them to be similar to Kleemann, but not as good as Evosport. In spite of what you've been told, they will not add 50 HP to your car. You may see about half of that - less if you don't mod.
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ventura County USA
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
I say the same thing. Grumpy's lookin' at something else, or I'm blind too. Tri-Y or not, I do agree that these guys are high if they think these alone will give 50HP.
#34
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A. CaLi
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 55 AMG DAILY!
Originally Posted by adam@kronen
Well bro, we'll see from the dyno results this friday shall we? I dont want to sound biased so i will leave that question unanswered. But I stand firmly behind Renntech and its products.
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. FLA.
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
05 ML-500 , 03 CLK5.5 AMG has left the Garage
headers
:confused: I believe Grumpy666 is refering to the Renntech Headers. He is too bright to be that far off. Then again maybe his meds ran out. That happens to me every now & then ___PTE___
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Grumpy666
If you think about how a performance header works, you will realize the fallacy of this statement. A 4-into-3 header requires two of the cylinders to share the same space, which results in a restriction for both cylinders. If it doesn't result in a restriction, then the tubes are not properly sized for the engine. Either way is a design flaw. Also, a 4-into-3 design means that the two merged cylinders will have different fuel mixtures compared to the other two cylinders, since the exhaust scavenging is different. If a 4-into-3 design produces more power than a properly-designed 4-into-1 header, then it's indicating that there are other problems that need to be addressed.
The dyno numbers with this set-up will be in-line with what we are seeing from klee and evo kits assuming the klee car has primary cats, be it aftermarket ones. I also think the 4-3 design should be the cheapest out of all of them by a decent margin.
Originally Posted by Grumpy666
The SS headers are a Tri-Y design. Every properly-executed test that I've seen in the past has shown the Tri-Y design to be inferior to a properly-designed 4-into-1 header.
#37
Senior Member
Making a sweeping statement like "a 4-3 makes less power than a 4-2-1", etc is completely pointless without knowing the firing order of the cylinders in question. A 4-3 header like the Renntech, can conceivebly make just as much if not MORE power through scavenging than a 4-2 or "tri-y" design if the shared tubes are on the correct firing order. This isn't new technology, it's been done for years and years. I'm not saying that that's the case for these Renntech headers, (I don't know the firing order on these motors) but it's something to keep in mind before people start throwing opinions around without backing them up with data.
#38
Originally Posted by rflow306
The advantage of a 4-1 in power will only be significant when hp levels begin to increase and more exhaust flow is needed.
Originally Posted by rflow306
Unless my eyes are deceiving me the supersprint headers I was referring to are a 4 into 1 conical slip on collector tapered down to 3 or 2.5 inches of outlet. They are pictured in the thread above.
Originally Posted by vrus
There are 4 distinct input pipes at the collector so they do seem to be equal length long tube headers.
#39
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 S65
I'm with Grumpy, those are not even close to equal length tubes. The rest is way over my head. I just need to see the dyno sheet for me to tell you which unit I'm putting on my car.
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Grumpy666
This is not correct. 4-into-1 headers have the biggest impact at torque peak, with a general increase in torque across the power band compared to other designs. Torque peak is the point in the RPM range where Volumetric Efficiency is the highest, not where the volume of exhaust flow is higher. An equal-length, 4-into-1 design enhances VE.
I understand that, I was referring to their real world advantage over a 4-3. That advantage only becomes noticeable at higher horsepower levels.
When they dyno tomorrow and display the graph I think we will see similar gains to other vendors. We can then dissect the graph and come to further conclusions.
Last edited by rflow306; 05-26-2006 at 07:49 AM.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by M5 RUS
Hey guys...what do you think about these headers ???
Kleemann Style...
Kleemann Style...
You also have to cut your exhaust and weld a new collector to match the headers. All in all very similar to kleeman. Actually if I'm not mistaken those headers were out before klee's or evo's, so the correct way to phrase it would be that the kleemann look like them. .
Last edited by rflow306; 05-26-2006 at 07:57 AM.
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2017 S63 Coupe Iridium Silver
Originally Posted by can drive 55
What do you guys think of Supersprint Headers? I talked to them and I was told that all emmisions equipment remains on the car, making them street legal. I am not sure where the primary cats go, as the headers look pretty long to me. He estimated a 50 HP gain w/o any programing of the ECU. the cost from their web site is
MSRP $5,297.12
Your Price: $3,807.30
MSRP $5,297.12
Your Price: $3,807.30
#45
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by adam@kronen
Post mod dyno.
I have to say.. that isnt an impressive gain.. 40rwhp and 40rwtq with headers, ECU and pulleys?? My car jumped 30rwhp and over 30rwtq just with headers and exhaust.
The car should be seeing 70 - 90 rwhp and 80 - 90 rwtq increase with those 3 items. I would have MB check the car over and look for codes (especially the intercooler pump).. That car should be making alot more power than it is.
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fremont, CA.
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL55 AMG, 2006 Range Rover Sport with Kahn Design Package
Vrus, you are right. I am suspecting that too. However, the physical test was so much better than the numbers. I dont know what's going on but i will try another place to dyno the car.
#48
Originally Posted by vrus
Adam,
I have to say.. that isnt an impressive gain.. 40rwhp and 40rwtq with headers, ECU and pulleys?? My car jumped 30rwhp and over 30rwtq just with headers and exhaust.
The car should be seeing 70 - 90 rwhp and 80 - 90 rwtq increase with those 3 items. I would have MB check the car over and look for codes (especially the intercooler pump).. That car should be making alot more power than it is.
I have to say.. that isnt an impressive gain.. 40rwhp and 40rwtq with headers, ECU and pulleys?? My car jumped 30rwhp and over 30rwtq just with headers and exhaust.
The car should be seeing 70 - 90 rwhp and 80 - 90 rwtq increase with those 3 items. I would have MB check the car over and look for codes (especially the intercooler pump).. That car should be making alot more power than it is.
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Rock
Do you know of any E55 with Rentech stage III that has ever seen the 11s in the 1/4 mile? I went to dragtimes.com and none are listed.
Adam needs to look over everything including the weather conditions inside the dyno room. I agree with victor the numbers seem very low to me.
Last edited by rflow306; 05-27-2006 at 07:48 PM.
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
yep, here is one, just ecu and pulley:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-7645.html
I personally saw this car run......
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...slip-7645.html
I personally saw this car run......
Originally Posted by Rock
Do you know of any E55 with Rentech stage III that has ever seen the 11s in the 1/4 mile? I went to dragtimes.com and none are listed.