J 2OOI

I didn't leave anything out intentionally. Antero and I will set up more runs when he has more miles on his ride.


Thanks for sharing!! I think I have seen those before just from searching on youtube, not from an mbworld link. I didn't know which car was which. I am assuming, now, that the white car is the 55. Just curious why didn't he do a burnout as well? Also, why didn't the camera man capture both results instead of just one of the cars #s? Thanks for the vids though!!

juicee63

This result would be expected. the SL should pull .2-.3 from 10-70 and hold the lead till around 115, the 63 hits max power in 4th gear between 130-145. A roll from 70-150 would put the 63 in front , Im sure you will see this at your upcoming event. Cars are close so the race parameters are critical in noting.

juicee63

Burnout was not helping traction. Sorry the video does not capture everything. It certainly demonstrates one thing..Black cars are always faster than White ones, LOL

SAMSSONZ

Like I said before, We're both amateurs on the track and Im sure my 20 inch rims say it all
As for the camera man, I dnt know wat he was smokin' but In all honesty, That wht 55 got beat so many times that day(about 10 times) by me, That I dont think anyone on the track including my camera man cared anymore.

SAMSSONZ

LOL +1000

juicee63

Here is another.

http://s96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...t=Video076.flv

J 2OOI

Thanks for the Info guys!

Silver cars are always faster than black cars though, why do you think the Mercedes F1 Pace Cars are silver

bfnnrgn

Don't forget they all take out the charcoal filters but still claim to be 'stock' If it really gives 20hp as they say, then an E55 with a 80mm TB or just a pulley should be 'stock' to yes?

bfnnrgn

You're forgetting that the SL55 is heavier and slower than an E55 though. Getting beat by an SL55 is not a good sign.

juicee63

NHRA does not consider filter change or removal a modification to the engine. LOL, nice try

WayneE

But for the purposes of comparing STOCK cars they are mods. Anything done to the car, other than maintenance, is a mod - filter(s), TB, airbox mods, ECU tuning, etc.

JAYCL600

josh u didnt just say that did u...shaking finger at u

Jrocket

You guys are getting a little out of hand here.

Yacht Master

Confirmed: E63 is faster than E550

Gustav do you believe this?

SAMSSONZ

Euro models dont come with a charcoal filter/ Its only done for u.s. emissions purposes. Its not really that big of a deal either

Yacht Master

Did you see 10 vids last night? I may have missed them, what with all the fireworks and all.

juicee63

There are only 7 posted but we have more.......Fact is My modded 63(filters removed, floor mats, ash trays, no spare tire) HAS NEVER LOST TO A 55 . I have raced several in the E and CLS form as well as an SL . Guess the ash tray removal makes the difference, oh yeah, NO CHANGE. The difference is minute, negligible, tiny,moot,not worth debating. Cars are = race is determined by Gustav err I mean driver. IRWINDALE tonight, come out and see , I believe and so will you

juicee63

According to Edmunds not even that is a true statement

Bluemax

My one and only run so far had the filters in place. Juice make us proud.. : v: .




Robert

JAYCL600

hillarious Josh who knew u had jokes

rflow306

What are you waiting for, go race juicee and show him what's up. If I owned a stock 55 in the west coast it would be on like Donkey Kong. The only logical reason for his victories must be that Juicee has raced the slowest 55's in the country.. Dam west coast 55's making all of us look bad.

55 for life.

LOL- just trying to add a little more fuel to the fire.

SAMSSONZ

Even though us 63 guys are a minority on this forum. We did provide more than a few vids of 63s beating the all mighty 55s yet you guys manage to bring out excuses like his car is slow or he didn't take his ash tray out or he wasn't wearing his lucky pink underwear or Whatever. Aside from all the gibberish I will race any stock 55 out here in socal (PREFERRABLY a CLS since the E-class is lighter)somewhere on the 101 by sfv. 30-100 and 60-140. This is in no way meant to disrespect any members here but to simply prove the superiority of the two for better or worse.

DJE55

Are you serious? You guys have posted a few vids of the same lame a$$ CLS55 getting beat over and over. That white car would have been beat by my wifes Navigator. The other car had the steering wheel on the wrong side so who knows with that guy. It was probably a suicide bomber trying to go unnoticed. All joking aside, have you guys not been looking at the track times for these cars? You don't have 1 car that has posted a time that will beat the average E55. I've seen plenty of E55's run like *****. I have a video of guys running my car turning 11.9's in it on the same day I ran 11.3's.

Some people love fast cars but they just can't drive. It's simple, if the 63's were faster, we would have seen at least one turn a good number by now wouldn't we? I love the cars but they just aren't as fast. Don't get me the BS about the mileage either. Most of you guys have more than 3k miles on your cars. You can settle this real easy, send some of your best E63's to MIR on 10/8 for the big track day. I'm sure they'll have plenty of stock E55's for you guys to prove your point on.

Man, we are starting to beat this to death almost as bad as the M5 vs E55 debate. FWIW I still love the 63's even though they are a bit slower.

Jrocket

Yes Lord Vader!

Juicee,my mentor has spoken! You must be put down now!

StevesAMG

I would be curious to hear the results from a roll...say 20mph-100mph or so. This is definately surprising given the fact that the 63 gives up ~40ft/lbs of torque.....Good for MB though.....I love to see progress and improvements in the engineering. :-)