It's Definite- MY E63 is as fast as MY E55 was!
You keep saying SLK55. That isn't the same power that you would ecpect out of aspirating an E63. Go ahead and do it. Also, be sure on what you say is "no problems". My point with all this was that you are giving up your warranty if you aspirate an E63 and you had better hope that the tuner will step up IF something goes astray. To blindly say a mod is fail safe is naive, as I found out with a simple pulley. ALL mods are a potential compromise, whether you like it or not. The 7g is a documented exception. You act like I'm bringing in a new secret. Even MB too YEARS to get it under control and you suggest it is rugged? Riddle me this: Why do the initial release of ALL 63s NOT hit redline in first?
Believe what you'd like and I'm not into arguing back and forth, but you should speak apples to aplles when you say things.
Believe what you'd like and I'm not into arguing back and forth, but you should speak apples to aplles when you say things.
This situation is not much different than tuned 65 AMG's that make 200lb-ft more torque than stock. Torque threshold is higher with the 5-speed tranny, but obviously its not unlimited. Mercedes limits their V12-bi turbo to a specific output for engine and transmission safety, just as they do with the 7-speed tranny and their new 6.2 engines. But this doesn't stop people from getting 200lb-ft of torque more out of their V12 bi-turbo engines. And so far, I don't think we've seen any transmission failures there either.
Last edited by Addicted2Speed; Apr 21, 2007 at 08:12 PM.
I guess not! Here's the best part though...you've had nothing to say since you got called out and bee-otch slapped and on first post back you chime in about murdering Joe's car and completely missing the point of his write up!!
We missed beating on you Nick! welcome back
Joe- Thanks for the write up. I'm eye-ballin an E63 or CLS63 for the next car (in the next 12-18 months) and this is worthwhile insight.
As far as bold talk if i still had my car and you guys think a E63 is gonna crush a 600hp plus E55 then your all smokin some good ****, lmfao
For now, the best mods I've seen for the E63 is headers and ECU. That's the same as on the 65s, even with their age so it is what it is. Maybe we'll see some SCs or Turbos released for the 63 soon. If not, we'll have to wait for AMG to come out with a new powerplant.
As far as bold talk if i still had my car and you guys think a E63 is gonna crush a 600hp plus E55 then your all smokin some good ****, lmfao
I'm more of a track type of guy and the smoother band would actually be easier to drive than the rough beast is. But, I love having all that wound up TQ.
. You have said a few things that i would like to ask and get more info on.1. is the 03 e55 one of the stronger 55k models? if so why
?2. something about cls rumor at the amg challenge, what rumor?
3. will 07 SL 55k 80m thing fit a cls 55k 06?
Thanks and forgive the bad terms
Did his widdle salvage get repo'd?
Have fun driving your quad, tool.
On Topic:
The 5-speed has no problem coping with 738 ft/lbs all day long in the 65 applications.
I think Jangy's point is that the 7g has yet to be proven at those power levels.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
. You have said a few things that i would like to ask and get more info on.1. is the 03 e55 one of the stronger 55k models? if so why
?2. something about cls rumor at the amg challenge, what rumor?
3. will 07 SL 55k 80m thing fit a cls 55k 06?
Thanks and forgive the bad terms

2 - When the CLS was first released, many here claimed it handled so much better than the E. It turns out that a new CLS did handle better than an '03 E, but that is due to the answer to #1. The AMG Challenge is where similar year E and CLSs were thrown at each other and it became clear that the E was the best handling of the two.
3 - The '07 SL55 80mm TB will indeewd fit, BUT the plenum (which mates the TB to the SC) needs to be machine matched. Also, since you will have it off, you may as well polich the interior chamber. In lue of this, you can spend $3000 to buy a complete set.
Hope that helps.
2 - When the CLS was first released, many here claimed it handled so much better than the E. It turns out that a new CLS did handle better than an '03 E, but that is due to the answer to #1. The AMG Challenge is where similar year E and CLSs were thrown at each other and it became clear that the E was the best handling of the two.
3 - The '07 SL55 80mm TB will indeewd fit, BUT the plenum (which mates the TB to the SC) needs to be machine matched. Also, since you will have it off, you may as well polich the interior chamber. In lue of this, you can spend $3000 to buy a complete set.
Hope that helps.
.Sorry if i went off topic.. i agree with the principle that there is no safe mod when the gains are so much, its always a risk... question is are you willing to take it
or even worse be the test subject
All the original poster was trying to share is what his 2 different tests yielded and he even tried to preempt the "toolish" behavior that followed, of course to no avail.
I gotta stop reading this crap but it is like a car accident, I can't stop looking!!!!!
All the original poster was trying to share is what his 2 different tests yielded and he even tried to preempt the "toolish" behavior that followed, of course to no avail.
I gotta stop reading this crap but it is like a car accident, I can't stop looking!!!!!
LOL, classic defensive move.
You give valid examples of 7g's pumping big power/tq in SLK's, very true, but a CLS/E is a significantly bigger fish. Add that weight with some traction and it may not fair so well.
can someone link me to this CarFax thread regarding the fully sick Nick?
just to make it clear....
my car is running at !00%
running out of steam really means: not a high revving engine or power curve hits hard from 2k to 5.5k rpms.
there is just something about an engine reving smoothly from 3.5k to about 7k rpms. You feel power as the rpms climb, the power surge continues.
I would trade down low torque for higher RPMS, 2 extra gears to save some gas when the wife drives.
Better brakes would be nice and better handling.
In all... nobody can say that I'm not a true AMG fan specially Kompressor engines.. but I do admit the E63 is better (not faster )
I hope you disclosed the frame damage, as to not do so would be fraud. (translation=jail for you)
Since the VIN is public info, it should be no problem for anyone on this forum to pass the info onto the new buyer.
Last edited by ChicagoX; Apr 25, 2007 at 07:20 PM.



