W211 E55 front and rear camber kit!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
W211 E55 front and rear camber kit!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is this what i think it is???? please tell me its the real deal!!!
Last edited by BMWEATR; 05-28-2007 at 07:22 PM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 E55
Sure looks like it ! Does our cars use the eccentric bushings front and rear or would it take a strut plate adjuster in front ? I have no idea what this suspension looks like. I don't care for the way it handles lowered. Too skittish on rutted blacktop.
#5
Super Member
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
Got a email back from them they said YES! these are for lowered cars!!
holy **** no more renn tech bend over $1200 priceing for the rears
holy **** no more renn tech bend over $1200 priceing for the rears
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
I did not find the data on that link about the parts but if it k-mac I have some warnings before plunking down money for those upgrades.
First, k-mac bushings are made from polyurethane and they are extremely firm. The ride on the car will go down to a point where many people will not want to drive the car daily. Bump impact will be extremely harsh and your car will start to fatigue in other places due to the lack of impact absorption. The car will drive better, it will have better steering response and it will likely have better tire wear but it might not be worth that reduction in ride quality.
They are good items but they can be VERY prone to failure. I had them on my C32 (front and rear) and SMGC32 had them on his C32 (his were a second and third generation parts while mine were the first generation). Mine failed in a day and SMG's first set failed in one track event. I worked with Keven on revising his parts and getting some solutions made but I am still not sold on the parts for long lasting bushing replacement.
In K-mac's defense Keven (their design specialist in Australia) is very polite and quick to revise parts when they fail but the failure is a large pain as labor on these can be astronomical. He even hand delivered me a set of replacement parts while he was vacationing here in the states so I could get the car ready for a track event 2 days later.
For the most part, a car like the E55 does not need drastic changes in alignment specs and I would rather fight quick tire wear than make the car prone to failure and very very rough riding.
SMG loved his car but with in 6 months of installing the bushings he sold the car. The ride was so terrible that he said forget it I am buying a new car that doe not require these parts to have an adjustable alignment (front and rear). To put things in perspective, before buying his C32, SMG drove around an E36 325is with no interior, 575 lb springs, no ac, no heater, loud exhaust etc and he loved that car and its ride was just fine. The C32 was a bit softer in the spring department but those bushings pushed him over the edge and he normally LOVES a stiff and extremely sporty car. His E90 BMW already has camber plates and coilovers with 500lb springs installed and he loves it.
First, k-mac bushings are made from polyurethane and they are extremely firm. The ride on the car will go down to a point where many people will not want to drive the car daily. Bump impact will be extremely harsh and your car will start to fatigue in other places due to the lack of impact absorption. The car will drive better, it will have better steering response and it will likely have better tire wear but it might not be worth that reduction in ride quality.
They are good items but they can be VERY prone to failure. I had them on my C32 (front and rear) and SMGC32 had them on his C32 (his were a second and third generation parts while mine were the first generation). Mine failed in a day and SMG's first set failed in one track event. I worked with Keven on revising his parts and getting some solutions made but I am still not sold on the parts for long lasting bushing replacement.
In K-mac's defense Keven (their design specialist in Australia) is very polite and quick to revise parts when they fail but the failure is a large pain as labor on these can be astronomical. He even hand delivered me a set of replacement parts while he was vacationing here in the states so I could get the car ready for a track event 2 days later.
For the most part, a car like the E55 does not need drastic changes in alignment specs and I would rather fight quick tire wear than make the car prone to failure and very very rough riding.
SMG loved his car but with in 6 months of installing the bushings he sold the car. The ride was so terrible that he said forget it I am buying a new car that doe not require these parts to have an adjustable alignment (front and rear). To put things in perspective, before buying his C32, SMG drove around an E36 325is with no interior, 575 lb springs, no ac, no heater, loud exhaust etc and he loved that car and its ride was just fine. The C32 was a bit softer in the spring department but those bushings pushed him over the edge and he normally LOVES a stiff and extremely sporty car. His E90 BMW already has camber plates and coilovers with 500lb springs installed and he loves it.
Last edited by CynCarvin32; 05-30-2007 at 02:00 AM.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
Soooooo could they use a different bushing? if someone requested? man thank god for the internet know one can hide!
ok cyncarvin, since I have air matic do you think this would take out the bump bump bump, from bottoming out on the bushings?
ok cyncarvin, since I have air matic do you think this would take out the bump bump bump, from bottoming out on the bushings?
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
These bushings replace the bushings in the front lower control arms and the rear lower control arms and then these bushings allow for adjustments through the eccentric adjustment bolts.
If you are getting a bump bump bump from bottoming out that is a ride height issue and the car needs to be raised up.
Can you explain that bump so I can better understand the issue?
#14
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Hey Eric: you really think that polyU bushings will be too much for me? I was planning on replacing all the bushings with PolyU ones as I swap out control arms, etc. You think it'll just be too much? Do you think the weight of the car and airmatic may make it different in the E vs the C?
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
I am not sure about the bump bump you are talking about. Bushings do not really bottom out unless you are talking about the rubber bump stop at the top of the sturt tube and air shock.
These bushings replace the bushings in the front lower control arms and the rear lower control arms and then these bushings allow for adjustments through the eccentric adjustment bolts.
If you are getting a bump bump bump from bottoming out that is a ride height issue and the car needs to be raised up.
Can you explain that bump so I can better understand the issue?
These bushings replace the bushings in the front lower control arms and the rear lower control arms and then these bushings allow for adjustments through the eccentric adjustment bolts.
If you are getting a bump bump bump from bottoming out that is a ride height issue and the car needs to be raised up.
Can you explain that bump so I can better understand the issue?
#17
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Nothing is required. It is all about your preference and driving style. I am actually looking for MORE camber. Others want less to minimize tire wear. The way that a arms work, you will definitely be adding negative camber as you lower. There is no real level where the lean gets too much.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
got a question. are camber kits required for all lowered cars, regardless of height?
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
Hi Ed
Yes, Yes, Yes, K-Mac manufacture "Bolt-on" front
(Camber and Caster) and rear (Camber and Toe) kits
for every Mercedes model manufactured from 1968 to 2007!
Ed - we have been specializing in manufacturing kits
longer than anyone else - with 12 International Patents
covering practically every make from Audi to VW!
Fact is that majority of new car manufacturers because
of the speed of production lines and also cost cutting
do not include Camber and Caster adjusters - yet
adjustment is essential with wide expensive low
profile tyres and especially if load carrying or altering
suspension height.
Plus also then having the ability to be able to adjust for
ongoing curb knock damage. Our problem here at
K-Mac is we lack marketing hype.
So engrossed in continually updating and inventing
new adjuster kits we haven't any time left to be out in
the market place making people aware that the kits are
available to increase traction, high speed directional
stability and reducing costly/premature inner edge wear!
So please spread the word that yes there is a cure.
Note: Refer our Mercedes listing on our Web site under
New Products- Mercedes.
Also please note correct 211E Part No. Front is
#502216K @ $465 US while rear is #502226i @ $345 US
Fedex Air express $45
Regards
Kevin
Yes, Yes, Yes, K-Mac manufacture "Bolt-on" front
(Camber and Caster) and rear (Camber and Toe) kits
for every Mercedes model manufactured from 1968 to 2007!
Ed - we have been specializing in manufacturing kits
longer than anyone else - with 12 International Patents
covering practically every make from Audi to VW!
Fact is that majority of new car manufacturers because
of the speed of production lines and also cost cutting
do not include Camber and Caster adjusters - yet
adjustment is essential with wide expensive low
profile tyres and especially if load carrying or altering
suspension height.
Plus also then having the ability to be able to adjust for
ongoing curb knock damage. Our problem here at
K-Mac is we lack marketing hype.
So engrossed in continually updating and inventing
new adjuster kits we haven't any time left to be out in
the market place making people aware that the kits are
available to increase traction, high speed directional
stability and reducing costly/premature inner edge wear!
So please spread the word that yes there is a cure.
Note: Refer our Mercedes listing on our Web site under
New Products- Mercedes.
Also please note correct 211E Part No. Front is
#502216K @ $465 US while rear is #502226i @ $345 US
Fedex Air express $45
Regards
Kevin
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Talk to them but I have had bad luck with them and I think that for a car of this nature its just nto worth it as you can adjust camber in other ways. Up front you can get over 2.5 degrees negative or nearly zero degrees even depending on which way you want to go. The back is not adjustable but you can have a camber link made fairly easily to make it adjustable without messing up the ride.
If you want to race the car sure they are good but its a questionable trade off for a car like this.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Hey Eric: you really think that polyU bushings will be too much for me? I was planning on replacing all the bushings with PolyU ones as I swap out control arms, etc. You think it'll just be too much? Do you think the weight of the car and airmatic may make it different in the E vs the C?
I am a race minded guy but I stopped before I ever started using the E55 for fast driving because I just did not want to go down that road. Clearly you are open do going down that road so who knows!
But if SMG and my self both thought they were to firm and we both dont mind a firm ride really that means they were very firm indeed.
For the W023 it was the ONLY way to dial in more negative camber and even then we only had 2 degrees negative. Adding washers in between the strut and the spindle allowed for nearly 3 degrees. Had the W203 had camber plates on the market I would never have gone down the road of using the K-mac kit. Its just to firm. But that C32 is sold mainly because it just became to firm for daily use and it was time for a new project car for SMG.
#22
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
You are right. This ain't a sports car to me. It has to remain "comfy" and still be fun, so I see your point.
A buddy of ours in the SDCrew is working on making adjustable arms for easy tuning, so maybe I'll just see how that goes.
Eric: is there another compromise that you recommend while I am taking the suspension apart? Maybe something that isn't quite so tight, but also not as sloppy as the E is now?