**CHICAGO CREW - July Meet!**
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Great meet everyone! Was fun seeing some old faces and some new. Things went off without a hitch and we had some powerful cars on CPT's dyno. Thanks to all who showed up!
Next event will be a drag day at Byron most likely, sometime in late August.
-m
Next event will be a drag day at Byron most likely, sometime in late August.
-m
#28
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2012 JDM
Sorry I couldn't make it up. It was rainy here Saturday morning and I didn't feel like driving in rain again this time...
How were the dyno pulls?
For those of you who attended lets hear the numbers or post up a chart.
How were the dyno pulls?
For those of you who attended lets hear the numbers or post up a chart.
#29
Super Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'08 S65, '04 Range Rover(The House), '06 Lexus GS 300(Wifey's), '02 Sea Ray 360 Sundancer
Attachment 110573
I'm being told that this dyno is VERY conservative! Feedback is appreciated! I was expecting 480 at the wheel, so I was a little disappointed. I was told a20-25% loss from crank to wheel. That would put me at 567-605! Huge difference. Please advise........
I'm being told that this dyno is VERY conservative! Feedback is appreciated! I was expecting 480 at the wheel, so I was a little disappointed. I was told a20-25% loss from crank to wheel. That would put me at 567-605! Huge difference. Please advise........
Last edited by ENDSMTG; 02-15-2008 at 03:52 PM.
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Attachment 110573
I'm being told that this dyno is VERY conservative! Feedback is appreciated! I was expecting 480 at the wheel, so I was a little disappointed. I was told a20-25% loss from crank to wheel. That would put me at 567-605! Huge difference. Please advise........
I'm being told that this dyno is VERY conservative! Feedback is appreciated! I was expecting 480 at the wheel, so I was a little disappointed. I was told a20-25% loss from crank to wheel. That would put me at 567-605! Huge difference. Please advise........
Per our discussion, here's a thread on the Subaru forum about Dynojet vs Dyno Dynamics - for your reference.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286440
As I said before - you made some really good numbers for being on a Dyno Dynamics.
-m
#31
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2012 JDM
Dave & Marcus:
Were there any stock e55's dynoed at the meet? I understand there are alot of variables but I was just going to compare the numbers to other dyno #s that we have seen for stock cars to see if the #s at the meet were conservative for stock cars, in comparison.
I did see your post Marcus, and it makes sense, just wanted to see what the difference was for our cars.
Were there any stock e55's dynoed at the meet? I understand there are alot of variables but I was just going to compare the numbers to other dyno #s that we have seen for stock cars to see if the #s at the meet were conservative for stock cars, in comparison.
I did see your post Marcus, and it makes sense, just wanted to see what the difference was for our cars.
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Jason:
My '03 E55 dyno'd there a couple of years ago @ 369rwhp. I did not have a chance to dyno my stock '05.
There was a stock CLS55 that dyno'd 375rwhp, 385rwhp, and 375rwhp. I think 370rwhp-380rwhp is realistically what a stock & healthy 55k car will dyno.
There was another stock '03 E55 that dyno'd ~340rwhp, but we think he's got a bad IC pump (it's never been replaced).
We then had another E55, that was supposedly stock, make 405rwhp - however most of us concluded that the car must be modified. The owner bought the car used from a dealer, so he was not aware of it.
CPT has a number of other E55 dynos as well. They recently had a K2 E55 make 430rwhp.
-m
My '03 E55 dyno'd there a couple of years ago @ 369rwhp. I did not have a chance to dyno my stock '05.
There was a stock CLS55 that dyno'd 375rwhp, 385rwhp, and 375rwhp. I think 370rwhp-380rwhp is realistically what a stock & healthy 55k car will dyno.
There was another stock '03 E55 that dyno'd ~340rwhp, but we think he's got a bad IC pump (it's never been replaced).
We then had another E55, that was supposedly stock, make 405rwhp - however most of us concluded that the car must be modified. The owner bought the car used from a dealer, so he was not aware of it.
CPT has a number of other E55 dynos as well. They recently had a K2 E55 make 430rwhp.
-m
#33
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2012 JDM
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
My '03 E55 dyno'd there a couple of years ago @ 369rwhp. I did not have a chance to dyno my stock '05.
There was a stock CLS55 that dyno'd 375rwhp, 385rwhp, and 375rwhp. I think 370rwhp-380rwhp is realistically what a stock & healthy 55k car will dyno.
There was another stock '03 E55 that dyno'd ~340rwhp, but we think he's got a bad IC pump (it's never been replaced).
We then had another E55, that was supposedly stock, make 405rwhp - however most of us concluded that the car must be modified. The owner bought the car used from a dealer, so he was not aware of it.
CPT has a number of other E55 dynos as well. They recently had a K2 E55 make 430rwhp.
-m
There was a stock CLS55 that dyno'd 375rwhp, 385rwhp, and 375rwhp. I think 370rwhp-380rwhp is realistically what a stock & healthy 55k car will dyno.
There was another stock '03 E55 that dyno'd ~340rwhp, but we think he's got a bad IC pump (it's never been replaced).
We then had another E55, that was supposedly stock, make 405rwhp - however most of us concluded that the car must be modified. The owner bought the car used from a dealer, so he was not aware of it.
CPT has a number of other E55 dynos as well. They recently had a K2 E55 make 430rwhp.
-m