Why the hatred of Dynojet dynos??
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Why the hatred of Dynojet dynos??
Talked with a few tuners over the past few weeks concerning my rich running issues and they all said the same thing, "What dyno did you use? Mustang?...GOOD!"
What up with the hatred for Dynojets. Seemed pretty nice to me when I went to the last one here in my area few years ago. (got sold and we are now Dynojet-less)
What up with the hatred for Dynojets. Seemed pretty nice to me when I went to the last one here in my area few years ago. (got sold and we are now Dynojet-less)
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
i don't know much about any newer dynojet models but most units still in use can't simulate a load (read: road like or closer to real world conditions) like the mustang or dyno dynamics machines. if you can't do that, then it's not as valuable of a tuning tool as afr's aren't as accurate. an exagerated example would be like trying to tune a car by just revving the engine.
i'm sure others can give better pro/cons.
i'm sure others can give better pro/cons.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Talked with a few tuners over the past few weeks concerning my rich running issues and they all said the same thing, "What dyno did you use? Mustang?...GOOD!"
What up with the hatred for Dynojets. Seemed pretty nice to me when I went to the last one here in my area few years ago. (got sold and we are now Dynojet-less)
What up with the hatred for Dynojets. Seemed pretty nice to me when I went to the last one here in my area few years ago. (got sold and we are now Dynojet-less)
It's a tool nothing else and in my opinion the most important should be who is using said tool the best. Just my 2.
Last edited by rflow306; 01-30-2008 at 01:30 PM.
#4
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi AS4
Talked with a few tuners over the past few weeks concerning my rich running issues and they all said the same thing, "What dyno did you use? Mustang?...GOOD!"
What up with the hatred for Dynojets. Seemed pretty nice to me when I went to the last one here in my area few years ago. (got sold and we are now Dynojet-less)
What up with the hatred for Dynojets. Seemed pretty nice to me when I went to the last one here in my area few years ago. (got sold and we are now Dynojet-less)
#5
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS55, BMW 540, SUPRA
Dynos such as mustang dynos, DynoDynamics are able to put load on the car so they are great for tuning the low speed/streetability aspects of a car. For WOT runs there is really not much difference between a dynojet and a load bearing dyno.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
That's wierd....... there was a thread about this the other day except that it was saying that the Mustang Dynos are not good as the dynojets because the results from the mustangs are not reproducable easily
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#7
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: da long island
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1989 Toyota Tercel Coupé
thats what i've always thought. it used to be stay away from the mustangs but now more people turn to them over the others