Dyno results
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55, 2000 CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Dyno results
Had an '04 and dyno'd it at 422.
Replaced that car with an '05 and that dyno'd at 360.
Should there be that much of a disparity in our cars?
Or did the shop not know to put it in dyno mode?
I wasn't there when it was done. Two different machines and I couldn't tell you what they are.
Comments would be appreciated.
Replaced that car with an '05 and that dyno'd at 360.
Should there be that much of a disparity in our cars?
Or did the shop not know to put it in dyno mode?
I wasn't there when it was done. Two different machines and I couldn't tell you what they are.
Comments would be appreciated.
#2
The machine will make a huge difference, as will the atmosphere you were in both times.
If you dyno'd your 04 in cold weather on a dynojet, you will get a high reading....especially in comparison to a hot day on a dyno dynamics. aka The Heartbreaker
If you dyno'd your 04 in cold weather on a dynojet, you will get a high reading....especially in comparison to a hot day on a dyno dynamics. aka The Heartbreaker
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55, 2000 CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Interesting. Thanks.
I wonder which is more accurate or true?
One results shows that info the other doesn't. I'll see if they still have it stored and recorded that part. They were both done during similar weather conditions, a week ago and early April last year. And similar elevation. Don't know about humidity and I'll see what machines.
I wonder which is more accurate or true?
One results shows that info the other doesn't. I'll see if they still have it stored and recorded that part. They were both done during similar weather conditions, a week ago and early April last year. And similar elevation. Don't know about humidity and I'll see what machines.
#4
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Dyno runs are very relative, depending on how the run is setup. Said that, 420 to the floor is about the mean and shouldn't vary more than 20 plus minus. Under 400 to the floor is not good. I don't think it is your car but the run sounds bad.
#5
The dyno dynamics is considered one of the most accurate dynometers, where as the Dynojet is the most popular and is considered the number that everyone uses when they reference their rwhp...even people who dyno on other machines, they generally do a conversion factor to tell people what their car would have made on a dynojet.
For tuning, you will do better with a loaded dyno, dynapack, dyno dynamics, etc...vs. a dynojet which offers little resistance and almost zero repeatability.
For tuning, you will do better with a loaded dyno, dynapack, dyno dynamics, etc...vs. a dynojet which offers little resistance and almost zero repeatability.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
inocnt1,
Find out what kind of dyno's they were on and we can go from there. That is a big variable. The other is a bad water pump. If you just picked up the '05, water pump could be an issue. No E55 should dyno 360rwhp - even on the dyno dynamics. My previous '03 E55 did 36xrwhp on a dyno dynamics when it had a bad water pump.
E55s will vary from car to car... I've seen from 380rwhp to 400rwhp for healthy cars on a dyno dynamics.
-m
Find out what kind of dyno's they were on and we can go from there. That is a big variable. The other is a bad water pump. If you just picked up the '05, water pump could be an issue. No E55 should dyno 360rwhp - even on the dyno dynamics. My previous '03 E55 did 36xrwhp on a dyno dynamics when it had a bad water pump.
E55s will vary from car to car... I've seen from 380rwhp to 400rwhp for healthy cars on a dyno dynamics.
-m
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55, 2000 CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Ok.
One must be a Dynojet cuz that's on the page three times. It also has the temp, etc. And is the lower of the two. Done on the new car.
The other one only shows "dynorun.002" as I guess the runfile.
Based on the comment above, a cold day on a dynojet should have produced a number substantially greater than 360.
So my baseline dyno is f'ed up. Oh well.
One must be a Dynojet cuz that's on the page three times. It also has the temp, etc. And is the lower of the two. Done on the new car.
The other one only shows "dynorun.002" as I guess the runfile.
Based on the comment above, a cold day on a dynojet should have produced a number substantially greater than 360.
So my baseline dyno is f'ed up. Oh well.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Ok.
One must be a Dynojet cuz that's on the page three times. It also has the temp, etc. And is the lower of the two. Done on the new car.
The other one only shows "dynorun.002" as I guess the runfile.
Based on the comment above, a cold day on a dynojet should have produced a number substantially greater than 360.
So my baseline dyno is f'ed up. Oh well.
One must be a Dynojet cuz that's on the page three times. It also has the temp, etc. And is the lower of the two. Done on the new car.
The other one only shows "dynorun.002" as I guess the runfile.
Based on the comment above, a cold day on a dynojet should have produced a number substantially greater than 360.
So my baseline dyno is f'ed up. Oh well.
Start with the water pump... on the dyno with limited airflow a bad pump will severely impact numbers. Order yourself up a CM30 or whatever weapon of choice and take that variable out of the equation.
-m
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55, 2000 CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
found out both shops were using dynojet.
also found out that the low results, they didn't put it in dyno mode. they just turned off the traction control.
would've been nice to have a baseline to see what i was starting from. oh well. glad to know they screwed it up rather than it being the car.
thanks for all the comments guys.
also found out that the low results, they didn't put it in dyno mode. they just turned off the traction control.
would've been nice to have a baseline to see what i was starting from. oh well. glad to know they screwed it up rather than it being the car.
thanks for all the comments guys.
#10
Dyno mode doesn't make more power, so you should still not have seen a decrease in hp to that extent. TC off, Dyno mode, etc...when you are in 3rd or 4th gear (if you are chipped), you will not be spinning the tires at those speeds, so your peak hp should be the same. Your tourque could be off if you spun at first, since peak torque in our cars is so low in the rpm band, but dyno mode should not have made any difference in your power output. Look into your pump.
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richmond Hill, Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55, 2000 CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
If the pump was off, would the car feel any different on the road? I didn't notice anything different during driving.
I've already swapped all the parts from the wrecked '04 to the new one. Part of that was a pump, so the pump has been taken care of (if that was the problem).
Still have to do an after-mods dyno.
If it's not in dyno mode, doesn't it stop revving at 4000rpm? Similar to revving it in park/neutral? I thought that would make a difference. And going to dyno mode, it lets it rev like it was actually driving?
I've already swapped all the parts from the wrecked '04 to the new one. Part of that was a pump, so the pump has been taken care of (if that was the problem).
Still have to do an after-mods dyno.
If it's not in dyno mode, doesn't it stop revving at 4000rpm? Similar to revving it in park/neutral? I thought that would make a difference. And going to dyno mode, it lets it rev like it was actually driving?
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Dyno mode doesn't make more power, so you should still not have seen a decrease in hp to that extent. TC off, Dyno mode, etc...when you are in 3rd or 4th gear (if you are chipped), you will not be spinning the tires at those speeds, so your peak hp should be the same. Your tourque could be off if you spun at first, since peak torque in our cars is so low in the rpm band, but dyno mode should not have made any difference in your power output. Look into your pump.
#13
If so, that would make sense...I know at the track, I notice zero difference in dyno mode or not, but I never thought about the front tires. Sorry for the mis-information if I am wrong. I know when you are spinning it causes a difference by decreasing the timing and applying some brake.
I know when I dyno'd mine, we had to do it in 3rd because my stock ECU would not mph enough for a 4th gear pull.
I know when I dyno'd mine, we had to do it in 3rd because my stock ECU would not mph enough for a 4th gear pull.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix by way of Texas
Posts: 1,010
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
found out both shops were using dynojet.
also found out that the low results, they didn't put it in dyno mode. they just turned off the traction control.
would've been nice to have a baseline to see what i was starting from. oh well. glad to know they screwed it up rather than it being the car.
thanks for all the comments guys.
also found out that the low results, they didn't put it in dyno mode. they just turned off the traction control.
would've been nice to have a baseline to see what i was starting from. oh well. glad to know they screwed it up rather than it being the car.
thanks for all the comments guys.
#15
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Dyno mode doesn't make more power, so you should still not have seen a decrease in hp to that extent. TC off, Dyno mode, etc...when you are in 3rd or 4th gear (if you are chipped), you will not be spinning the tires at those speeds, so your peak hp should be the same. Your tourque could be off if you spun at first, since peak torque in our cars is so low in the rpm band, but dyno mode should not have made any difference in your power output. Look into your pump.
Dyno mode makes a difference on the dyno and on the track. To say otherwise is like saying Drag radials don't make a difference. Some don't notice the difference, but that is not the same as there not being a difference.
#16
Yes, I understand that if you are spinning, and if the computer begins to pull timing, apply the brakes, etc...but as soon as you are not spinning, does being in dyno mode offer anything extra? Talking about the track here again, if the front tire thing is correct for the dyno, then I will conceed that point. Since you rarely see cars spin on the dyno, that is where I based my assumptions from.
But for the track, just like you mentioned, drag radials not making a difference. Again, true for the holeshot, but otherwise, a drag radial will generally offer a disadvantage if you are concerned about trap speeds and such due to the lower air pressure and larer surface area and friction. So are you saying that once you leave the line (done spinning) that being in dyno mode basically makes more hp than not being in dyno mode?
But for the track, just like you mentioned, drag radials not making a difference. Again, true for the holeshot, but otherwise, a drag radial will generally offer a disadvantage if you are concerned about trap speeds and such due to the lower air pressure and larer surface area and friction. So are you saying that once you leave the line (done spinning) that being in dyno mode basically makes more hp than not being in dyno mode?