Houston / Austin / San Antonio Dyno Day – October 24th
Any details - pics, easy to get to? I assume it works the same as the tach sensor on the coil wire? I have the one from ATI smart Tach
I'll try to take some pics next time i'm at a dyno. Just made a piggyback harness for ground side of injector wire.
from tuned ONLY S65 running 93 octane.There just isn't 177 odd RWTQ to be gained by adding ONLY 2-3 PSI over Busa's old tune that was set to 22 PSI in his earlier posts, remember the Roger V. S65 ECU airbox/HE upgrades by RENNtech? it ran 11.06 @ 128.7 mph it dyno'd on DynoJet @ 610 rwhp 720 rwtq on 105 OCTANE TUNE
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-10181.html
Doubt the 105 Octane tune? look @ the Dyno in link, AFR's are in high 13's no way that S65 is on anything less than 105 octane...
I don't care nor did I ever comment on the 55k baselines or tunes, just the 65/600 results are in question/hyped/flawed...
), they're on a different planet. Sean, it's apparent for paying customers who demand BIG results, ignorance is bliss. If the extra hundred some odd tqs are helping them sleep at night, who are you to kill it for them with real average numbers from numerous different dynos (from different tuners) around the country? Clearly, if you happen to disagree with their results (and I use "results" loosely as a recent tune showed no improvement on the track-- wonder where all that extra tq went
) and post incontrovertible evidence suggesting their dyno is inflating numbers, you're DynoEnvy.
It's obvious that where RennTech and Kleemann have failed and were able to extract only a mere 720tqs on 105 race fuel, they were able to MacGyver another 120++rwtqs out of the V12s on just 93.

670rwtq bone stock ahahahahahaha L O L!!!! omg
Shieettt maybe I need to blaze one too for these numbers to stick!! ahahahaahahaha... hahaha...ha... On a serious note, I've got a few islands to sell-- PM for me details.
Shardul, hit me up after NY, we need to fix this problem.
Oh yeah, that S65 was a BEAST!
Just so we're clear, that's a 51rwhp increase and a 173rwtq increase over the stock tune in my car.....or as some of you would say my "already tuned" car.
I but it's finally done, it's done right, and my car is brutally fast.
Busa196-
I would pay money to see you come to Texas and face Busa, Aggie and Exotic face to face. Insulting them and their intelligence is stupid at best and considering they are 6'8, 6'7, and 6'6 respectively you may rethink who you are antagonizing.
Whatever chump err I mean champ
Signed terrified in So Cal LoLoLoLoL!!!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Here is the deal: you can doubt the numbers all you want. And others can defend them, it is a forum and a free country after all.
But insulting people YOU don't know is not too smart. Since I've seen all three guys you've challanged why don't you post a picture of yourself in this thread so we can see why your not "scurrred".
And for the record, I’ll be going to the track shortly and I’ll revert with ET’s/MPH backed up with video footage....only to be questioned by certain people, behind their keyboards here with their own “calculations” and “theories” based on their internet wisdom for why I must be lying, or why my car isn’t ECU tuned only, or the calibration of the clocks must be off, etc….
For those of you doubting my numbers by LET, let’s line ‘em up and find out how much hp/torque my 65 “really” makes.
Some of you need to get a grip and back away from the keyboard......

E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.
CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.
www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
PS. Its race season here on the east coast. For all you guys that say "i have X RWHP and X RWTQ" and "X PSI of boost" its time to produce some real world numbers, and thats ET and Trap. C u all at the track!!
Last edited by JAYCL600; Oct 27, 2009 at 05:43 PM.
But insulting people YOU don't know is not too smart. Since I've seen all three guys you've challanged why don't you post a picture of yourself in this thread so we can see why your not "scurrred".
Buncha kids around here, trying to stir sh.t up. Blaze one, you need to take a step back and realize thericker never said anything about fighting with anyone. Amazingocity brought it up. And regardless, I hardly consider insulting people as disagreeing with people's dyno numbers-- talk about panties in a wad.
On-topic... the peak HP numbers for the V12TT vehicles are stout but in-line with good results IIRC, but the peak TQ readings are stratospheric. Plausibly a calibration problem, but hard to say anything definitively. Couldn't agree more with the owner/operator's assessment that this is merely a tool in the toolbox for measuring modding/tuning performance improvements. Best to be viewed as just that, IMHO. Look forward to seeing the track results of these beasts when they run - I'm confident they'll be strong.
https://mbworld.org/forums/sl-class-...ml#post3780385
This explains the 845 rwtq S65/SL65 data now, once again very disapointing...
... by the way the whole thing about casting stones C32- shouldn't you be Looking forward?
... by the way the whole thing about casting stones C32- shouldn't you be Looking forward?
I love it when the arguing halfwit is reduced to grammar corrections

& fight challenges
Last edited by Thericker; Oct 27, 2009 at 07:23 PM.

You know I liked your other wheels too until I discovered your post about how "crappy" they were.
Last edited by blazeone; Oct 27, 2009 at 07:30 PM.
... by the way the whole thing about casting stones C32- shouldn't you be Looking forwardE?
Go get some fresh air - dude.









I'm just itching for a good DA day!