W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Boost question???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 12:35 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
bassn_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E55 AMG
Boost question???

Quick boost question. Just recently I had my car on the dyno with my new 185 pulley and I was logging around 13 pounds of boost. I picked up about 1 pound of boost which was expected. Now for the part I don't understand. Just recently I went to the track to get some more logging done and I was seeing around 1.5 pounds of boost higher at the track than on the dyno... I was thinking this could have something to do with the load on the dyno vs the track??? Any suggestion would be appreciated. It's nothing really major but I don't feel comfortable running my car hard unless I understand what's going on.

I've just recently heard the little chirping noise coming from the front of my SC which just progressed into a ticking noise. The noise seems to be there only on cold start ups. I'm thinking bearings or clutch assembly.
Old 04-12-2010, 02:21 AM
  #2  
Member
 
REALA2R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 Mercedes Benz E55
Originally Posted by bassn_07
Quick boost question. Just recently I had my car on the dyno with my new 185 pulley and I was logging around 13 pounds of boost. I picked up about 1 pound of boost which was expected. Now for the part I don't understand. Just recently I went to the track to get some more logging done and I was seeing around 1.5 pounds of boost higher at the track than on the dyno... I was thinking this could have something to do with the load on the dyno vs the track??? Any suggestion would be appreciated. It's nothing really major but I don't feel comfortable running my car hard unless I understand what's going on.

I've just recently heard the little chirping noise coming from the front of my SC which just progressed into a ticking noise. The noise seems to be there only on cold start ups. I'm thinking bearings or clutch assembly.
That's what happened to my '04 before I had the clutch pack changed out. I had it changed out, and it's much more quiet now, and no chirping before I get into it.

-Chad
Old 04-12-2010, 07:10 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by bassn_07
Quick boost question. Just recently I had my car on the dyno with my new 185 pulley and I was logging around 13 pounds of boost. I picked up about 1 pound of boost which was expected. Now for the part I don't understand. Just recently I went to the track to get some more logging done and I was seeing around 1.5 pounds of boost higher at the track than on the dyno... I was thinking this could have something to do with the load on the dyno vs the track??? Any suggestion would be appreciated. It's nothing really major but I don't feel comfortable running my car hard unless I understand what's going on.

I was under the impression that you used a dynojet for the last dyno session? If so, then there wouldn't be any load applied to the car on the dyno. If you used a load-bearing dyno, then you're absolutely right: a difference in load settings/specs could greatly affect the outcome. But having the car produce an additional pound and a half of boost at the track is indeed a little strange I wonder if it was due to the extreme grip from the drag radials during the launch allowing the ECU to apply full power? Or could be that the ECU was holding back on the dyno for some reason - possibly heat and air flow defeciency? Was the +1.5 psi gain maintained consistently throughout the whole run? And did you see the same 1.5 increase in all the runs or only some of the runs?

Originally Posted by bassn_07
I've just recently heard the little chirping noise coming from the front of my SC which just progressed into a ticking noise. The noise seems to be there only on cold start ups. I'm thinking bearings or clutch assembly.
Sounds like symptoms of clutch assembly.... do you feel a rough/violent supercharger engagement along with the noise or maybe getting worse as the noise gets worse? Also, have you checked the idler pullies? Usually their bearings go out first.

Last edited by MB_Forever; 04-12-2010 at 02:45 PM.
Old 04-12-2010, 07:18 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
stevebez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,066
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, LRD4 HSE, R107 280SL
Belt / clutch slip is my best guess...
Old 04-12-2010, 07:32 AM
  #5  
PTE
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. FLA.
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
05 ML-500 , 03 CLK5.5 AMG has left the Garage
Boost ?

When I run my car on a 248 H Dyno Jet , That has only 1-36" fan & 10" Squirrel cage. I see 6.8 PSI at 6400 rpm. On the street I've seen as high as 7.6 - 7.8 psi , At the drags I see 8.3 Psi. Repeatedly. I believe it has to do with the increased air flow to the front of the car. Cheers _PTEngineering
Old 04-12-2010, 08:22 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
beauphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
Originally Posted by PTE
When I run my car on a 248 H Dyno Jet , That has only 1-36" fan & 10" Squirrel cage. I see 6.8 PSI at 6400 rpm. On the street I've seen as high as 7.6 - 7.8 psi , At the drags I see 8.3 Psi. Repeatedly. I believe it has to do with the increased air flow to the front of the car. Cheers _PTEngineering
Thats what I was thinking. More airflow on he track that cant be replicated on a dyno without a wind tunnel...

Do you feel like the bigger pulley and extra boost was productive or counter-productive for your setup?
Old 04-12-2010, 09:41 AM
  #7  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by beauphus
Thats what I was thinking. More airflow on he track that cant be replicated on a dyno without a wind tunnel...

Do you feel like the bigger pulley and extra boost was productive or counter-productive for your setup?
You mean smaller pulley
Old 04-12-2010, 10:36 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
beauphus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: palm beach
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 & CL CK60
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
You mean smaller pulley
I was speaking of Alans larger pulley. He increased his pulley size and I was wondering if he felt the increase in pulley size and boost was beneficial over the 180.
Old 04-12-2010, 10:40 AM
  #9  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by beauphus
I was speaking of Alans larger pulley. He increased his pulley size and I was wondering if he felt the increase in pulley size and boost was beneficial over the 180.
Oh ok. I was confused since you quoted Pat's post
Old 04-12-2010, 10:59 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
LOCO 05' E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 755
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P-Carro
Originally Posted by bassn_07
Quick boost question. Just recently I had my car on the dyno with my new 185 pulley and I was logging around 13 pounds of boost. I picked up about 1 pound of boost which was expected. Now for the part I don't understand. Just recently I went to the track to get some more logging done and I was seeing around 1.5 pounds of boost higher at the track than on the dyno... I was thinking this could have something to do with the load on the dyno vs the track??? Any suggestion would be appreciated. It's nothing really major but I don't feel comfortable running my car hard unless I understand what's going on.

I've just recently heard the little chirping noise coming from the front of my SC which just progressed into a ticking noise. The noise seems to be there only on cold start ups. I'm thinking bearings or clutch assembly.
What was your psi like with the 180mm? I used to see it climb up to 15.3 with Dashdaq and it drops to about 13psi. Fluctuating off course. Are these real numbers? Or is it just an approximation? Im thinking you should be higher with a 185mm
Old 04-12-2010, 11:37 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by PTE
...I believe it has to do with the increased air flow to the front of the car. Cheers _PTEngineering
+1

are your afr's keeping up with the extra boost?
Old 04-12-2010, 12:25 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lowprofile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55
The only other factor not mentioned, which can effect your PSI, would be DA.
Old 04-12-2010, 01:20 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by lowprofile
The only other factor not mentioned, which can effect your PSI, would be DA.
+1 to what everyone else is saying.

The greater airflow, true 100% load, and (likely) better-than-inside-the-shop atmospheric conditions are all contributing factors in your real-world boost numbers being higher than the on-dyno boost numbers. Not surprising, IMHO, and good of you to datalog both environments to see the difference.
Old 04-12-2010, 07:02 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
sneakyneon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Heres my guess....I think its based on load, Thats why first gear tends to make 1.0 psi less boost than seconed and I tends to .5-.75 more in 3rd. Most dyno's are not set up to see the same load ithat you would see in 4th that you would see on the road.
Old 04-12-2010, 07:45 PM
  #15  
PTE
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. FLA.
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
05 ML-500 , 03 CLK5.5 AMG has left the Garage
Just a tad on the rich side

I know this is Allan's Thread, but to answer Mikey's Question. I'm using a new /old stock Innovate LM-1 and it is difficult to understand the graph, even when I stretch it out on the computer Screen. I got the wideband 02 sensor in the header collector, And at the top of every gear I'm down to 10.6 & 10.8 to 1. I'm hoping Allan will help me, when I get my new Purchase of a Zeitronix. Cheers _PTEngineering
Old 04-12-2010, 07:52 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
Tech-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ/Greece
Posts: 952
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
2006 CLS55 & 2002 SL55 (R129) Silver Arrow
Originally Posted by LOCO 05' E55
What was your psi like with the 180mm? I used to see it climb up to 15.3 with Dashdaq and it drops to about 13psi. Fluctuating off course. Are these real numbers? Or is it just an approximation? Im thinking you should be higher with a 185mm
Boost will fluctuate from car to car due to modifications and sometimes software.
I've personally seen a 1.5lb drop in boost from major exhaust modifications.

Its not necessarily a bad thing. In some cases it just means your motor is operating more efficiently.
Old 04-13-2010, 12:42 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
bassn_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by REALA2R
That's what happened to my '04 before I had the clutch pack changed out. I had it changed out, and it's much more quiet now, and no chirping before I get into it.

-Chad
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
I was under the impression that you used a dynojet for the last dyno session? If so, then there wouldn't be any load applied to the car on the dyno. If you used a load-bearing dyno, then you're absolutely right: a difference in load settings/specs could greatly affect the outcome. But having the car produce an additional pound and a half of boost at the track is indeed a little strange I wonder if it was due to the extreme grip from the drag radials during the launch allowing the ECU to apply full power? Or could be that the ECU was holding back on the dyno for some reason - possibly heat and air flow defeciency? Was the +1.5 psi gain maintained consistently throughout the whole run? And did you see the same 1.5 increase in all the runs or only some of the runs?
Mo, this was done a Dyno Dynamics. The boost increase has been consistent both at the track and street pulls, in Mexico of course.

Originally Posted by MB_Forever
Sounds like symptoms of clutch assembly.... do you feel a rough/violent supercharger engagement along with the noise or maybe getting worse as the noise gets worse? Also, have you checked the idler pulleys? Usually their bearings go out first.
I'm thinking of going with the ASP group of pulley's but my next stage of mods will cost a little more than expected.... I will need to see how my budget looks once I decide what I'm getting done. Worse case I'll purchase them in next couple of months when the man fund account recuperates.

Originally Posted by PTE
When I run my car on a 248 H Dyno Jet , That has only 1-36" fan & 10" Squirrel cage. I see 6.8 PSI at 6400 rpm. On the street I've seen as high as 7.6 - 7.8 psi , At the drags I see 8.3 Psi. Repeatedly. I believe it has to do with the increased air flow to the front of the car. Cheers _PTEngineering
This could very well be the cause of my boost increase. To be honest I never even considered the extra airflow vs the dyno. I must say though this is the first time I have witnessed the varying boost numbers from the track to the dyno.

Originally Posted by beauphus
Thats what I was thinking. More airflow on he track that cant be replicated on a dyno without a wind tunnel...

Do you feel like the bigger pulley and extra boost was productive or counter-productive for your setup?
It's very hard for me to come to a conclusion right now due to the multiple change done at once - pulley, Meziere, and straight pipe. I will be reversing the pumps very soon and I'll hit the track one last time before my cams go in. As my friend stated, I need to get this IAT situation under control before moving forward.

Originally Posted by LOCO 05' E55
What was your psi like with the 180mm? I used to see it climb up to 15.3 with Dashdaq and it drops to about 13psi. Fluctuating off course. Are these real numbers? Or is it just an approximation? Im thinking you should be higher with a 185mm
My boost with the 180 was right around 12.5-13 psi in 3rd gear during the lower RPM's at WOT. Most people don't believe these numbers but a very similar modded car, almost identical, has seen the same numbers.

Originally Posted by lowprofile
The only other factor not mentioned, which can effect your PSI, would be DA.
My guess would be that DA didn't range anymore than 1000.

Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
+1 to what everyone else is saying.

The greater airflow, true 100% load, and (likely) better-than-inside-the-shop atmospheric conditions are all contributing factors in your real-world boost numbers being higher than the on-dyno boost numbers. Not surprising, IMHO, and good of you to datalog both environments to see the difference.
Real-world numbers are always nice to see but sometimes hard to swallow. I'll be adding a few features to my logging system and once finished it will be amazing. I have always felt logging would be key to both success and safety.

Originally Posted by sneakyneon
Heres my guess....I think its based on load, Thats why first gear tends to make 1.0 psi less boost than seconed and I tends to .5-.75 more in 3rd. Most dyno's are not set up to see the same load ithat you would see in 4th that you would see on the road.
Thanks buddy! Just about a month away !!!!

Originally Posted by PTE
I know this is Allan's Thread, but to answer Mikey's Question. I'm using a new /old stock Innovate LM-1 and it is difficult to understand the graph, even when I stretch it out on the computer Screen. I got the wideband 02 sensor in the header collector, And at the top of every gear I'm down to 10.6 & 10.8 to 1. I'm hoping Allan will help me, when I get my new Purchase of a Zeitronix. Cheers _PTEngineering
Once you get your Dashdaq/Zeitronix combo you'll be very impressed. The logging capabilities are endless and they sky's the limit. Thanks again Pat and I'm anxiously awaiting the cams .

Originally Posted by Tech-Tune
Boost will fluctuate from car to car due to modifications and sometimes software.
I've personally seen a 1.5lb drop in boost from major exhaust modifications.

Its not necessarily a bad thing. In some cases it just means your motor is operating more efficiently.
Very well said. All cars will not boost the same, mods and other factors will play a major role. Actually the next time out I'll log both through the OBD and direct from the surge tanks to compare numbers, that would be interesting.
Old 04-13-2010, 02:49 AM
  #18  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 91 Likes on 46 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
What are you using to monitor boost on the dyno? OBDII or tapped tank? i've seen some slight variations from the two. Nothing big though..

Belt slippage on the dyno should show up. making the HP graph look a bit all over the place. So if you look at your graph that could either rule in or rule out the belt.

Airflow is my guess.. In my situation, I would put one of the fans up high to try to simulate track or real world airflow. When I did this I seen my boost go up about 1psi and taper off less at redline.

As much as it is important to have good airflow directed at the radiator. I like to keep one of the big fans up near the intake.

I had a funky intake cone filter on my C55. For s&g's I would sometimes pick up the floor fan and hold it right on the cone filter. that put me into the 500whp area.. Never really counted those big numbers though.

It would be cool to have some form a a CFM meter to run on the dyno and then at the track. then check the variations
Old 04-13-2010, 10:48 AM
  #19  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
TTMotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Whatever we're tuning!
YOU CANNOT DUPLICATE REAL WORLD(CFM) AIR FLOW ON A DYNO NO MATTER HOW MANY FANS YOU ARE USING!!!

The dyno would have to be in a wind tunnel and there are only 2 I believe in the country.

As with hp and tq numbers, all other numbers are skewed due to not having the capability to duplicate REAL WORLD conditions and I don't mean DA! DA is one thing that can be corrected!
Old 04-13-2010, 10:50 AM
  #20  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by TTMotorsports
YOU CANNOT DUPLICATE REAL WORLD(CFM) AIR FLOW ON A DYNO NO MATTER HOW MANY FANS YOU ARE USING!!!

The dyno would have to be in a wind tunnel and there are only 2 I believe in the country.

As with hp and tq numbers, all other numbers are skewed due to not having the capability to duplicate REAL WORLD conditions and I don't mean DA! DA is one thing that can be corrected!
I use the big dyno. The 1320' of black pavement I use ET Streets to strap it down and my printout is on a slip. All the numbers I need right there. Load and airflow are calibrated 24/7 at a rate of more than a sample per ms

Edit: And yes I live my life a 1/4 mile at a time

Last edited by blackbenzz; 04-13-2010 at 10:54 AM.
Old 04-13-2010, 11:03 AM
  #21  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
TTMotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Whatever we're tuning!
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
I use the big dyno. The 1320' of black pavement I use ET Streets to strap it down and my printout is on a slip. All the numbers I need right there. Load and airflow are calibrated 24/7 at a rate of more than a sample per ms

Edit: And yes I live my life a 1/4 mile at a time
You fukin kill me Ahmad!

Why are people so interetsed in dyno numbers?

It must be the Kool Aid!
Old 04-13-2010, 11:10 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
emoving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
3-five-five/ TUNDRA/ 07 997 cab
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
I use the big dyno. The 1320' of black pavement I use ET Streets to strap it down and my printout is on a slip. All the numbers I need right there. Load and airflow are calibrated 24/7 at a rate of more than a sample per ms

Edit: And yes I live my life a 1/4 mile at a time
So yoyr slips are all just signatures of the people that own the cars whos *** you kick that say they have 900hp! Seriously though, if you dyno 600hp but get smoked by a 400hp Subi......who cares what the dyno numbers are really.
Old 04-13-2010, 11:13 AM
  #23  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
MBH motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Posts: 2,305
Received 91 Likes on 46 Posts
C63, SL55, E55, CLS55, ML63, C55
Originally Posted by TTMotorsports
YOU CANNOT DUPLICATE REAL WORLD(CFM) AIR FLOW ON A DYNO NO MATTER HOW MANY FANS YOU ARE USING!!!
The key word was "try". Knowing that my filter setup never got any real air, due to its location. The point was to show that more airflow (more than what was normally seen on the dyno) resulted in the boost to increase. So maybe I worded it a bit strange I think we all know you cant dupe real world CFM with a standard dyno fan setup.
Old 04-13-2010, 11:24 AM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
930chas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: merryland
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cornfed gtr and m3
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
I use the big dyno. The 1320' of black pavement I use ET Streets to strap it down and my printout is on a slip. All the numbers I need right there. Load and airflow are calibrated 24/7 at a rate of more than a sample per ms

Edit: And yes I live my life a 1/4 mile at a time
Good stuff, Ahmad!! haha....
Old 04-13-2010, 11:24 AM
  #25  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
TTMotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Whatever we're tuning!
Originally Posted by MBH motorsports
The key word was "try". Knowing that my filter setup never got any real air, due to its location. The point was to show that more airflow (more than what was normally seen on the dyno) resulted in the boost to increase. So maybe I worded it a bit strange I think we all know you cant dupe real world CFM with a standard dyno fan setup.
My post was in no way directed at you Mike!

You are an extremely well versed person in the tuning world but the majority of MBWorld members are and about dyno and the numbers they show!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Boost question???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.