Those running 275/30/20 rears
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
A4, M3, 996, E55
Those running 275/30/20 rears
Can you post profile pictures of your cars?
I'm torn on running the 275/30 vs. the appropriate sized 285/25/20's.
I realize that the disadvantages of running them (rolling diameter, speedo error, looks slightly SUV-ish) but I'm leaning towards the advantage of a bit more sidewall to protect the wheels since our E55 is my wife's daily driver.
Thanks.
I'm torn on running the 275/30 vs. the appropriate sized 285/25/20's.
I realize that the disadvantages of running them (rolling diameter, speedo error, looks slightly SUV-ish) but I'm leaning towards the advantage of a bit more sidewall to protect the wheels since our E55 is my wife's daily driver.
Thanks.
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Tampa, FL
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 BLK/BLK E-Double Nickel.
here ya go
When i had on the 20's i went with the the 275/30/20 dues to our pot-holes in NYC..... it didn't look as bad as people are describing it....
#3
Newbie
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1992 NSX, 2003 Escalade, 2003 E55
Just got a set of roderick cinques 20s. I am running 285/25/20 on rear. I have about 1 to 1.25 inch of sidewall with falkens 452s. I don't think there is much difference between 275/30/20. Maybe a quarter inch max. taller for 30 series. But Damn, 285s sure do look good!
My wife drives it and I am always paranoid that she's going to hit a pothole or something! If you have horrible roads where you're at go with 275/30. More peace of mind, but seriously I think it's going to make a huge difference. As for me, looks all the way!!!
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)