Black_55AMG

I smell fish with 507whp and 119mph traps

55fanatic

lol Schooled

skratch77

Those dynos dont show up and Im not making dumb things up,Im trying to teach you that any dyno can be messed with.

That is why I dont use any correction factors in my runs.what the car puts down is what the car puts down that day,that temp and that run.Just like when you go to the 1/4 on different conditions you get better runs in.

you can set the sea but if the weather conditions are not input properly you get a wrong reading.

you are prolly about 490-500whp with proper baro settings

GT-ER

Take your car to the track with a 2500+DA with ZERO weight reduction and see what you run before you comment on my run.

I myself have had my disagreements with Skratch77 about dyno numbers but he is 100% correct in this topic. The SAE calculations aren't at fault here, it's the dyno's barometer that is not correct.

Keep in mind that the lowest ever recorded on earth was a little under 26. There is no way yours is correct.

CharlyE500

Hey, no need to be rude to other member. He is just giving you his thoughts and comments. Don't be a sore loser. your dyno number is really high with your mod, 185 pulley and OE tune. Fuel rail and EC fuel injector provide 20whp, its more for safety issue instead of power.
Basically 518whp 605 torque with 185 pulley and tune is basically impossible.

KLR CLS

There is not a 49 WHP difference between a 170 and a 185mm pulley. Injectors also do not add 20+ whp peak. The let you get alittle more under the curve. Without a TB or headers it's not likely the car can make more than 500whp. Max I have seen from a properly corrected Pulley+ tune only car is 480whp. Either way, scratch pointed out the baro difference, and correction factor issue. Great to be able to tell your friends that it's a 520whp car, just don't line up against a proper Stage 3+ car.

When I said net increase I meant what was the baseline dyno?

AKnight55

Ever heard of traction issues and bad track prep??

Vic55

Who cares if its a real 500hp car..... on paper or not. Get it to the track to confirm the numbers. Then the OP can either quiet the non believers or will have to have the car re-dyno'd correctly.

My E55 never dyno'd over 500 hp but it sure did well at the track over here in Cali. So I was happy with the paper snail. Id rather have it this way than vice a versa.

e55amgrocket

Ive got headers,tb,injectors, 175(might be a 178) pulley,trunk tank with ice, and i made 537 on a honest dyno jet and that was on a 40 degree day and 2 fans running. A dyno operator can make a car dyno what they want to.

skratch77

just asked to get my dyno with a 1.17 cf and was a no go lol He said Iwould have to dyno my car way up in the mountains of colorado and have it over 115d out to get that CF lmfao

e500slr

There's only one way to tell, get that car to the track and video the results. Quarter mile is more accurate than dyno since at the end of the day people want high dyno numbers so they do well on the 1320.

cahiil55k

I'm sure the dyno operator just forgot to reset the correction factor after "tuning" a dyno-queen Civic. OP's 1.17 correction factor is way off. I just looked at two of my dyno pulls (#s below), and your cf should have been around 0.98 - 1.00, not 1.17.


Max Power = 517.44 Max Torque = 587.56


Max Power = 514.68 Max Torque = 585.73