G-Tech Pro RR vs V-Box Sport vs Atco Raceway Timer
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
G-Tech Pro RR vs V-Box Sport vs Atco Raceway Timer
On a 10.897 130.08 mile run at Atco these are the comparison runs
NO ROLL OUT programmed in.
G Tech Pro RR , V Box Sport. , Atco
60ft - 2.053 , 1.99 , 1.67
330ft -5.053 , 4.98 , 4.645
1/8 mi. -7.545. , 7.41 , 7.073
MPH - 100.55 , 102.5 , 100.52
1/4 mi -11.46 , 11.25 , 10.897
MPH -126.37 , 129.9 , 130.08
03 SL55 11/03/14 Atco
NO ROLL OUT programmed in.
G Tech Pro RR , V Box Sport. , Atco
60ft - 2.053 , 1.99 , 1.67
330ft -5.053 , 4.98 , 4.645
1/8 mi. -7.545. , 7.41 , 7.073
MPH - 100.55 , 102.5 , 100.52
1/4 mi -11.46 , 11.25 , 10.897
MPH -126.37 , 129.9 , 130.08
03 SL55 11/03/14 Atco
Last edited by cnterline; 11-06-2014 at 06:55 PM.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Crunched the numbers
![](https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mbworld.org-vbulletin/662x325/rollout_calculations_62f68caa756dd988c1ad2104e85f42a01ad455c4.png)
I decided to crunch the numbers, and it looks like the V Box is the clear winner!
If I did this correctly (please correct me if I didn't), the V Box would have been correct to within ~0.01s if you had programmed in a 0.336s rollout, whereas the G Tech would have been off by a relatively large ~0.08s if you had used a .457s rollout for it.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Man I don't even know what you did I sucked at math lol ,however both are excellent tools for testing purposes if you use the same spot every time.