Aquamist HFS-3 Advice Needed
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Aquamist HFS-3 Advice Needed
I talked with Jeff over at Howerton Engineering and he recommended one to two 1mm nozzles post IC. I have seen several mentione #3 and #7 nozzles but I assume that is relative to the manufacturer of the respective kit.
I've read some threads that say to place the nozzle pre-IC before the fins, others saying to place a nozzle post-IC and a nozzle pre SC, which may or may not cause issues with the SC bearings?
I guess it really all comes down to testing and goals etc. With that said, I would like to keep IAT's as close to ambient or even below if possible without tuning to remove fuel. What ratio mixture and which size nozzles should I use with regards to the HFS-3? Where should these nozzles go for best results, atomization pre-IAT/MAP sensor etc.
Thanks for any help!
I've read some threads that say to place the nozzle pre-IC before the fins, others saying to place a nozzle post-IC and a nozzle pre SC, which may or may not cause issues with the SC bearings?
I guess it really all comes down to testing and goals etc. With that said, I would like to keep IAT's as close to ambient or even below if possible without tuning to remove fuel. What ratio mixture and which size nozzles should I use with regards to the HFS-3? Where should these nozzles go for best results, atomization pre-IAT/MAP sensor etc.
Thanks for any help!
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Although the aquamist is a great system and different from the others, I would still use one nozzle. You just have to figure out if you will use 100% water or 50/50 mix because the nozzle should be smaller for 100% water
Last edited by Hulk; 04-29-2015 at 11:08 AM.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
If the nozzle is installed just after the intercooler, can you get in there to change the nozzle without removing the blower?
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
I would like to refrain from having to take fuel out of the tune to compensate for the meth, from what some have mentioned a 50/50 mix would likely enrichen the mixture, correct? Would one nozzle with say an 80/20 mix be enough to keep IAT's below say the 115F mark? Unless of course the tuner has changed the default of a second 3* of timing being pulled at ~115F IAT.
From Jeff--
"
The cliff notes is water only cools down to 130F or so, meth will cool sub ambient. My guess would be one large to two large jets as a starting point. Probably 2 x 1.0mmm jets after the IC if possible, you may need more depending on the readings.
The kit comes with every bit needed to run a two jet system except for a tank.
Jeff"
From Jeff--
"
The cliff notes is water only cools down to 130F or so, meth will cool sub ambient. My guess would be one large to two large jets as a starting point. Probably 2 x 1.0mmm jets after the IC if possible, you may need more depending on the readings.
The kit comes with every bit needed to run a two jet system except for a tank.
Jeff"
Last edited by jmb614; 04-29-2015 at 12:02 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
If you use straight water then you wouldn't get the benefit of octane boost with the methanol, correct? Would a .7mm nozzle be large enough for an 80/20 or 90/10 mix?
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
So you are running one nozzle, what size and mixture ratio?
According to this article:http://howertonengineering.com/tech-...ating-jetting/
If following the formula and assuming 8 cylinders with 550cc fuel injectors and also assuming between 12.5% - 17.5% of fuel flow as 100% water requires between 10-15% of fuel flow, and 50/50 requires 15-20% of fuel flow, (I stated 12.5% - 17.5% due to 80/20 mix), then it appears that two jets would be needed in the range of .8mm to .9mm.
Given that it is difficult enough to find spots to place the nozzles I would assume if you are only going with one nozzle, even with 100% water, wouldn't you want to do a 1mm to 1.2mm nozzle, or is my math off?
Of course if your real world testing says otherwise than I am fine with that given that so many others have said #2 or #3 in the TB housing and #7 post-IC.
According to this article:http://howertonengineering.com/tech-...ating-jetting/
If following the formula and assuming 8 cylinders with 550cc fuel injectors and also assuming between 12.5% - 17.5% of fuel flow as 100% water requires between 10-15% of fuel flow, and 50/50 requires 15-20% of fuel flow, (I stated 12.5% - 17.5% due to 80/20 mix), then it appears that two jets would be needed in the range of .8mm to .9mm.
Given that it is difficult enough to find spots to place the nozzles I would assume if you are only going with one nozzle, even with 100% water, wouldn't you want to do a 1mm to 1.2mm nozzle, or is my math off?
Of course if your real world testing says otherwise than I am fine with that given that so many others have said #2 or #3 in the TB housing and #7 post-IC.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Ya, I had the bigger nozzle and it just didn't work because it was too big , either would bog or if I used meth it made it rich so I changed to smaller noz
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Oh no šhit eh? I thought you were running a different kit entirely? So you only run one .7 nozzle post IC aka Sneakyneon location across from the MAP sensor?
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yes same position as sneaky
Now what happened to me is I got a DO pump with the boost activation an went with the aquamist nozzle after using the DO nozzle which I didn't like.
I saw a friends set up with the AQ and really good and I said if I could do again it's AQ all the way.
The AQ system I the best imo
Now what happened to me is I got a DO pump with the boost activation an went with the aquamist nozzle after using the DO nozzle which I didn't like.
I saw a friends set up with the AQ and really good and I said if I could do again it's AQ all the way.
The AQ system I the best imo
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
According to Jeff at Howerton a M3 is about (.6mm)250cc and M7 is about (1.2mm)600cc.
If you run the calculations, and considering the HFS-3 injects differently than the DO, it appears that, with a 50-/50 mix, around 800-850cc of injection is needed.
I'll likely try a .4 pre-SC and 1.2 post IC and see how things shake out. I could always easily blank the .4 pre-SC and if absolutely necessary drop injector down in size on the post IC.
If you run the calculations, and considering the HFS-3 injects differently than the DO, it appears that, with a 50-/50 mix, around 800-850cc of injection is needed.
I'll likely try a .4 pre-SC and 1.2 post IC and see how things shake out. I could always easily blank the .4 pre-SC and if absolutely necessary drop injector down in size on the post IC.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Isn't an M7 what most have ran post IC, with success? Are you speaking to a bogging issue with the amount that is injected using that size of injector?
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
I had a bigger nozzle, close to m7 and afr became rich and lost power, saw it on the dyno. you want to cool only, no tuner will tune for it.
.7mm aquamist nozzle post ic, that's my opinion, you can do what you want though.
.7mm aquamist nozzle post ic, that's my opinion, you can do what you want though.
#24
Super Member
I would listen to hulk he knows his stuff but like we spoke on the phone I run a #7 and #4, yes it runs a little richer but not too bad. Also you can change the mixture from 50/50 to like a 30/70 which I plan on trying next week to see what it will do to my AFR but I don't mind it running a little rich plus you gain boost either the 50/50 mix so it equals out.. I'm happy with my setup but deff going to try some different mixtures to see what it'll do to my AFR. Good luck.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Thanks for the help Hulk, much appreciated. I really want to be able to play around with jet sizes and such, maybe start off with just one jet at a .7 and see how it goes.