W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

DEAD HORSES AND LOW IAT QUESTIONS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-05-2016 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
EREBUS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 637
Likes: 39
From: Keller
clk63, cls55, ml63, (w210) E55
DEAD HORSES AND LOW IAT QUESTIONS

Originally Posted by Hotsauce55
My thoughts, looking for more experienced folks to comment. This could be used as a basic guide for folks & since the E55's biggest performance obstacle is controlling IAT's I figured it was worth a conversation:
This sh*t needs to stop. lol. 12 degrees of timing pulled at 180+ IAT's costs you, maybe, 30-50 hp. (220 IATs disengages supercharger) Please understand that fuel dumping cools cylinder combustion and helps with ignition due to avoiding pre-ignition and AFR leaning (knock). So it really isn't as extreme of hp loss as some might think. For example:

Monitor your timing and watch it adjust as the conditions vary. Timing gets pulled for various reasons that your ECU sees fit. Not just for IAT's

Too many variables during combustion that many overlook. So let me, once again, reiterate that it's a battle not worth losing sleep over.


Here is some data on IATs and options to lower them.


The correlation between chasing low IAT's and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder:


They correlate. Move on.



Using Nitrous to drop IAT's

30-50hp dry shot is somewhat safe (wet shot is safer, of course) with a slightly rich AFR non-nitrous tune.(then again, you just tune for safety with nitrous) Let's make something perfectly clear, though.....estimated hp nitrous spray delivery/output varies due to:

1) cylinder compression
2) nitrous bottle temps
3) nitrous set up of location of bottle and nozzles.


My point? Skip the headache unless you plan to track a lot. Besides, once you win with nitrous the other guy will automatically assume is was a 500 hp shot. Just say'in.


Originally Posted by Hotsauce55

1. Killer chiller
This one is simple. Good choice if:

1) you live in a location that never gets hot
2) you don't track your vehicle
3) like to race no more than 3 seconds at a time
4) consider humidity a beautiful thing while driving


If all above is you? Get a meth/water injection kit to compensate the other 80% of IAT cooling needed when your A/C turns off during WOT.


This guy is an a*s at times. Some of his info might help though?

Originally Posted by EREBUS

Reservoir tanks:

1) Trunk tanks are good for track days WHEN using ice
2) Trunk tanks add more fluid.....but take longer to cool (no ice)
3) Large trunk tanks add a lot of weight. We don't need more weight. Period.
4) Engine reservoir tanks are small and absorb engine heat
5) Small reservoirs need coolant lines on the bottom so flow does not cause air pockets near cap.
6) ^^^^^^^Regardless of what you choose.....try to use larger fittings and hoses so upgrades later will be easy.

Heat exchangers:

1) You're good. Move on ( The intercooler is the problem...not the contact area for ambient temps to attempt to cool off the heated intercooler water. Why? Its called diminishing returns. There is a point when you increase boost (13+psi....ish) and the hot compressed air will not get cool enough flowing through the inefficient intercooler core that is using above ambient water. Period.)

Meth/Water Injection:

1) 75% water/ 25% meth ratio
2) @13 gph worth of nozzles is safe for a nicely modded M113K
3) Nozzle locations? That is another battle for another day.
4) Use at LEAST a 2+gallon meth tank. You're going to use it.
5) Go simple and use a boost pressure switch for activation of meth/water
6) DO NOT TUNE FOR METH/WATER.
Originally Posted by Hotsauce55
Not sure about the following:

1. Headers (they reduced IAT's a fair bit in other applications)
Not really. They reduce boost that reduces heat.
2. Porting supercharger (in Grand Prix's that used to net huge temp reductions!)
I just posted on this recently, actually. Our blower is pretty damn efficient for a factory blower. Well, kinda. Regardless, porting gained me an average 3/4 psi and no noticeable IAT drop.
3. Bigger rad options?
You got me on this question. Only "rad" I know was a horrible bmx movie back in the 80's ?



As always, I like to have fun and mean no ill will if I offended anyone. Working on lowering IATs is a time vampire.
The following users liked this post:
BlackHammer (10-06-2016)
Old 10-06-2016 | 12:55 AM
  #2  
BC928's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 71
From: SoCal
2006 E55, Various other German and ‘Murican
Obviously not going to offend anyone. You are clearly trying to help people and short cut some bad decisions.

I'd say some if it is a bit simplified and if someone wanted to spend more time in something engineering it properly, they could make things work. Giving the system more sq inch area can only help, from where we are now.

Unfortunately, the platform simply doesn't have enough numbers - so serious development will not be happening. You info can only help people.
The following users liked this post:
EREBUS (10-06-2016)
Old 10-06-2016 | 09:03 AM
  #3  
seanol's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 183
Likes: 33
From: Joshua, TX
2004 AMG E55
Originally Posted by BC928
Obviously not going to offend anyone. You are clearly trying to help people and short cut some bad decisions.

I'd say some if it is a bit simplified and if someone wanted to spend more time in something engineering it properly, they could make things work. Giving the system more sq inch area can only help, from where we are now.

Unfortunately, the platform simply doesn't have enough numbers - so serious development will not be happening. You info can only help people.
Some of us have thick skin. As long as the discussion continues at least we can move forward, albeit slowly.

I may not agree with some of the absolutes stated but that is on me to provide a differing opinion and validate my theory.

Sean
Old 10-06-2016 | 09:49 AM
  #4  
BlackHammer's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 789
Likes: 36
2006 E55
This needs to be sticky.
The following users liked this post:
EREBUS (10-07-2016)
Old 10-06-2016 | 10:46 AM
  #5  
BlackHammer's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 789
Likes: 36
2006 E55
Originally Posted by EREBUS


Reservoir tanks:

1) Trunk tanks are good for track days WHEN using ice
2) Trunk tanks add more fluid.....but take longer to cool (no ice)
3) Large trunk tanks add a lot of weight. We don't need more weight. Period.
4) Engine reservoir tanks are small and absorb engine heat
5) Small reservoirs need coolant lines on the bottom so flow does not cause air pockets near cap.
6) ^^^^^^^Regardless of what you choose.....try to use larger fittings and hoses so upgrades later will be easy.

Great post overall BUT...

Point #5 be very careful and I call BS on it (like my mechanic did). I had a coolant line installed as described. In order for this to work the mechanic installed a flexible (thin and flimsy) tube that was inserted in the inlet.

The combo platter of the tube being compressed in the inlet and the suction from the I/C pump resulted in the tube being compressed to where there was very little liquid movement. Similar to sucking a straw really hard. The straw contracts where you can't suck anything out of it (water, air etc.).

Add ice to the engine bay tank and what happens? The ice crushes the tube.

I was blaming my Killer Chiller not working, IC pump not working, plugged hoses, bad install from the mechanic. Removed the tube and all problems solved...

TK
Old 10-06-2016 | 10:59 AM
  #6  
Hotsauce55's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 609
Likes: 19
From: Ontario
2005 E55
About time a smug know it all put everyone straight
The following users liked this post:
EREBUS (10-07-2016)
Old 10-06-2016 | 08:55 PM
  #7  
Ruthle55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 19
e55 amg
This is literally the best thread I've ever seen in the w211 section.
The following users liked this post:
EREBUS (10-07-2016)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: DEAD HORSES AND LOW IAT QUESTIONS



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.