W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Within 20-25k, what car will you choose to replace you E55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-20-2017, 03:43 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
milkboneeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Within 20-25k, what car will you choose to replace you E55

just curious..

got bored today and went online trying to see what kinda car is out there...
only one that i can consider replacing my e55 is the e60 m5, but you all know they have a tons of issue..

so, what will you choose if you have 20-25k laying around..
*to replace your w211 amg, not getting another toy*

my list:
e60 m5
EVO
R32 GTR
Old 09-20-2017, 10:39 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
M5 LOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 340
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts
05 E55 (06 E55 RIP)
Originally Posted by milkboneeee
just curious..

got bored today and went online trying to see what kinda car is out there...
only one that i can consider replacing my e55 is the e60 m5, but you all know they have a tons of issue..

so, what will you choose if you have 20-25k laying around..
*to replace your w211 amg, not getting another toy*

my list:
e60 m5
EVO
R32 GTR
replace it in what sense, speed or luxury?

996 911. coyote mustang. R32/3 GTR a lot options really.
Old 09-20-2017, 11:09 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
cfmistry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,019
Received 348 Likes on 213 Posts
15 S550 4Matic, 86 560SL
Originally Posted by milkboneeee
just curious..

got bored today and went online trying to see what kinda car is out there...
only one that i can consider replacing my e55 is the e60 m5, but you all know they have a tons of issue..

so, what will you choose if you have 20-25k laying around..
*to replace your w211 amg, not getting another toy*

my list:
e60 m5
EVO
R32 GTR
E63 or 911
Old 09-20-2017, 11:17 PM
  #4  
Member
 
GM_Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: VA
Posts: 99
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
NA
A well sorted W220 S65. MAYBE a W221, but man are they hideous...
Old 09-21-2017, 05:16 AM
  #5  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
E63..
Old 09-21-2017, 08:10 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Hotsauce55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 609
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
2005 E55
EVO/R32 are tuners cars not in same category as a Merc. Plenty potential to go fast but garbage interiors etc..

Maybe an N/A Porsche but i'd feel ripped off knowing the turbo version was out there. Truthfully its tough to find a suitable replacement that hits the luxury, build quality & performance factors.

I would say a B8 S4, 4 dr V8 M3 or CTS-V but not sure about quality on that one.
Old 09-21-2017, 06:44 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Strigoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 3,250
Received 255 Likes on 233 Posts
2001 E320 Wagon, 2006 LBZ Silverado, 2007 E63 (sold), 2001 E55 (sold)
I'd say E63 since what I paid for mine is in that range. Can't really think of any other car I want that would cost that much.
Old 09-21-2017, 09:49 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
M5 LOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 340
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts
05 E55 (06 E55 RIP)
Originally Posted by Hotsauce55
EVO/R32 are tuners cars not in same category as a Merc. Plenty potential to go fast but garbage interiors etc..

Maybe an N/A Porsche but i'd feel ripped off knowing the turbo version was out there. Truthfully its tough to find a suitable replacement that hits the luxury, build quality & performance factors.

I would say a B8 S4, 4 dr V8 M3 or CTS-V but not sure about quality on that one.
S4 timing belt issues
E92 M3 rod bearing issues
CTSV junk
Old 09-21-2017, 11:06 PM
  #9  
Member
 
94jedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 100
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2007 Infiniti M45
No votes for the w204 c63?
Old 09-22-2017, 01:30 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
The Fly 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 269
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
E-55,IS-250
Spend a little more and get a S63 or Porsche panorama
thats what i would do
Old 09-22-2017, 05:14 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
Hotsauce55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 609
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by M5 LOL
S4 timing belt issues
E92 M3 rod bearing issues
CTSV junk
let's be clear, every car has it's issues whether timing tensioners, rod bearings, electronics, sbc, airmatic etc...

- wrong generation s4 - b6 and b7 had those problems widespread. It was a timing chain not a belt and tensioners were the biggest problem. Plastic and brittle.
- rod bearing replacement isn't tough or that costly diy especially when considering an airmatic strut replacement cost
- quality of the ctsv interior and electronics I have read, is a bit behind but the motor is an allstar. Junk is taking it a bit far imo.
The following users liked this post:
GM_Lover (09-22-2017)
Old 09-22-2017, 01:22 PM
  #12  
Member
 
GM_Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: VA
Posts: 99
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
NA
The 2nd gen CTS-V has far more potential than our E55's. It's not even close. There's a reason why a number of the regulars from this forum have moved on to that platform. On top of that, a brand new LSA crate engine from the supercharger lid down to the oil pan only costs around $10k, so total catastrophic engine failure is relatively no big deal. The CTS-V's older generation mag-ride suspension also puts our (or any air or hydro) suspension to absolute shame. They're decent for performance but where they really shine is everyday driving where they soak up bad bumps and potholes like you're driving on a newly paved road. The interior and fit and finish in the 2nd gen CTS-V might be worse but it offers a much, much smoother ride than the E55.
Old 09-22-2017, 03:22 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Kalashnikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 30
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
2006 Ferrari 575 M
Mitsubishi Mirage ES with 5 speed manual. Super simple, super fun to drive, gets 45+ MPG, can be fixed with a brick and a shoe string, easy to park, super practical, takes regular gasoline...$100/year all-in for maintenance costs, cheap to insure.
Old 09-22-2017, 05:57 PM
  #14  
Member
 
fergsc32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Western Mass
Posts: 201
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
2011 c63 AMG
Originally Posted by The Fly 1
Spend a little more and get a S63 or Porsche panorama
thats what i would do
porsche panorama..is that a new model ?? or is that the replacement for my porsche panamera
Old 09-22-2017, 08:32 PM
  #15  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
Originally Posted by fergsc32
porsche panorama..is that a new model ?? or is that the replacement for my porsche panamera
Convertible version.
Old 09-22-2017, 11:11 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
M5 LOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 340
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts
05 E55 (06 E55 RIP)
Originally Posted by Hotsauce55
let's be clear, every car has it's issues whether timing tensioners, rod bearings, electronics, sbc, airmatic etc...

- wrong generation s4 - b6 and b7 had those problems widespread. It was a timing chain not a belt and tensioners were the biggest problem. Plastic and brittle.
- rod bearing replacement isn't tough or that costly diy especially when considering an airmatic strut replacement cost
- quality of the ctsv interior and electronics I have read, is a bit behind but the motor is an allstar. Junk is taking it a bit far imo.
did you just compare replacing rod bearings to replacing a $400 air strut?
Old 09-22-2017, 11:49 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Tavs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 e55
Originally Posted by M5 LOL
did you just compare replacing rod bearings to replacing a $400 air strut?
That's actually a funny analogy as I would rather do rod bearings then replace an air strut. (Cost wise) Sure it is like 15 hours of work vs 1, but that is just a late Friday and all day saturday. A remain Arnott strut is like $550 (675 new). Bearings would be 420, add a fresh tube of sealant and a new gallon of coolant and it is just a couple bolts.
Old 09-22-2017, 11:53 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
M5 LOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 340
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts
05 E55 (06 E55 RIP)
Originally Posted by Tavs
That's actually a funny analogy as I would rather do rod bearings then replace an air strut. (Cost wise) Sure it is like 15 hours of work vs 1, but that is just a late Friday and all day saturday. A remain Arnott strut is like $550 (675 new). Bearings would be 420, add a fresh tube of sealant and a new gallon of coolant and it is just a couple bolts.
the lunacy of this post is nothing short of impressive.
The following users liked this post:
GM_Lover (09-23-2017)
Old 09-23-2017, 12:01 AM
  #19  
tw2
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tw2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 3,412
Received 280 Likes on 231 Posts
2005 E55 AMG, 1991 MR2
Originally Posted by M5 LOL
the lunacy of this post is nothing short of impressive.
+1, I rather replace all four struts and the compressor before pulling the engine out. I'll have fries and a new crankshaft with that
Old 09-23-2017, 12:20 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
M5 LOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 340
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts
05 E55 (06 E55 RIP)
Originally Posted by tw2
+1, I rather replace all four struts and the compressor before pulling the engine out. I'll have fries and a new crankshaft with that
you can do rod bearings with the motor in the chassis in most cars, including the E92. but its a not a walk in the park. my point is simple, replacing a strut is a gravy job, done in an hour with hand tools, and less with a lift and air tools.

having to replace rod bearing as a wear item at low miles is stupid. the class action lawsuit over the v8 in those m3s is proof enough. the E60 M5s suffer from this as well which is not too surprising as the S85 is the same motor with two bores cut off in the M3.
Old 09-23-2017, 09:18 AM
  #21  
DVC
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
DVC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
'06 E55 AMG
Originally Posted by GM_Lover
The 2nd gen CTS-V has far more potential than our E55's. It's not even close. There's a reason why a number of the regulars from this forum have moved on to that platform. .
On the flip side, I know several who've switched to the Gen 2 V and then came back to the E55.

I love the LS motor and have built a Porsche LS2 swap, but the GM build quality with the rest of the car is not comparable to the W211. The higher mileage CTS-V specimens are showing as much. The potential for power and tuning is superior with the V, no doubt. But, sometimes there's more than that when living with a car.

Just IMHO though.
Old 09-23-2017, 12:08 PM
  #22  
Member
 
Rallyboy383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 165
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2004 E55
Originally Posted by M5 LOL
the lunacy of this post is nothing short of impressive.
I had a very good chuckle reading the above statements. I lol'd so hard!!
The following users liked this post:
GM_Lover (09-23-2017)
Old 09-23-2017, 01:57 PM
  #23  
Member
 
GM_Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: VA
Posts: 99
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
NA
Originally Posted by DVC
the GM build quality with the rest of the car is not comparable to the W211
Couldn't agree with this more! There's literally no GM, including current gen Cadillacs, that can match the fit-finish and material quality of even a 15-YO W211. Not hyperbole. Heck, my $19k msrp 2000 VW's fit/finish and material quality was on a much, much higher level than my $48k msrp Chevy SS. Again, not hyperbole. But I'm a big GM (and really, all domestic brand) fan because overall, they offer a lot of car for the money compared to other manufacturers. I think owning any domestic will always be a compromise though if performance and standard features aren't the only things that matter to you.

Having said that, one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about Mercedes is how they strip down a car (even to the hids on some models) just so they can meet some target price of entry. Then they offer literally 3 dozen mind-numbing options, so that when equipped with reasonable features that you'd get standard on many $25k cars nowadays, the price of the Merc is suddenly 35% more than what you started with. I cross shopped a GLA45 with my Chevy SS since their msrp's were pretty much the same. But equipping the AMG to similar specs as the SS brought the AMG to over $65k. Anyway I digress...
Old 09-23-2017, 03:16 PM
  #24  
Super Member
 
Hotsauce55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 609
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by M5 LOL
did you just compare replacing rod bearings to replacing a $400 air strut?
i compared the diy cost plz read.
Old 09-24-2017, 09:25 AM
  #25  
Super Member
 
Dublinoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Dublin,OH. Ft Myers, FLA
Posts: 638
Received 82 Likes on 76 Posts
E63 AMG 2007
I've owned every German brand, and I don't believe anything equals the quality and durability of Mercedes. I think the answer is found somewhere in their line up. But you will trade "newer" for "less performance" in that price range.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Within 20-25k, what car will you choose to replace you E55



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.