Sorry Guys!
I also question some of their logic in some AMG models, eg:
S55 AMG: last thing i need is a 60 year old rear ending me in one of these because he sneezed.
ML55 AMG: ... wtf were they thinking. you're gonna drag race an SUV now...? ummm great.
SL55 AMG: that much power in a 4500ish pound car... you know something's definately wrong when the tires limit your top speed.
To me, it seems that Benz is just building these models for the sake of saying "we have the most powerful x car on the market" instead of actually building a beautifully balanced performance car, which is what i think the big 3 (Mercedes AMG, BMW M, Audi S) are suppose to do.
All three seems to have lost sight of what they're suppose to do, but I believe Mercedes has really lost it. BMW seems to be at least ahereing to tradition. I appuld them for not building an M7 or an X5 M, as those two models do not deserve a motorsport badge.
Don't get me wrong, I believe the E55, the CLK55, the SLK32, and the C32 to be great cars. My quarrel is not specfically aimed at them, it's at AMG overall. They are the models that i believe truly deserve the AMG badge. I would definately love to own one of these, but would I BUY it if I had the chance?
probably not.
They're not very well suited towards my style of driving. I derive a lot more fun from cars when the engine is the limiting factor, not the suspension, the tires, or the brakes. --yes, i admit, i'm a huge honda s2000 fan :p
I live pretty much at the base of a mountain range (about an hour away from lake tahoe/reno) and to me, driving around in there would seem a lot more fun in a honda s2k, where i would downshift to enter a uphill curve, hitting redline just a bit after the apex, and pulling into the next gear for the upcoming straight, instead of say in an S55, where i would just keep 5 gear through the curve and floor it in the straight.
I hope you guys can understand where I'm coming from.
I welcome further discussion into this, if we can keep it to a civilized manner.
I also question some of their logic in some AMG models, eg:
S55 AMG: last thing i need is a 60 year old rear ending me in one of these because he sneezed.
ML55 AMG: ... wtf were they thinking. you're gonna drag race an SUV now...? ummm great.
SL55 AMG: that much power in a 4500ish pound car... you know something's definately wrong when the tires limit your top speed.
To me, it seems that Benz is just building these models for the sake of saying "we have the most powerful x car on the market" instead of actually building a beautifully balanced performance car, which is what i think the big 3 (Mercedes AMG, BMW M, Audi S) are suppose to do.
All three seems to have lost sight of what they're suppose to do, but I believe Mercedes has really lost it. BMW seems to be at least ahereing to tradition. I appuld them for not building an M7 or an X5 M, as those two models do not deserve a motorsport badge.
Don't get me wrong, I believe the E55, the CLK55, the SLK32, and the C32 to be great cars. My quarrel is not specfically aimed at them, it's at AMG overall. They are the models that i believe truly deserve the AMG badge. I would definately love to own one of these, but would I BUY it if I had the chance?
probably not.
They're not very well suited towards my style of driving. I derive a lot more fun from cars when the engine is the limiting factor, not the suspension, the tires, or the brakes. --yes, i admit, i'm a huge honda s2000 fan :p
I live pretty much at the base of a mountain range (about an hour away from lake tahoe/reno) and to me, driving around in there would seem a lot more fun in a honda s2k, where i would downshift to enter a uphill curve, hitting redline just a bit after the apex, and pulling into the next gear for the upcoming straight, instead of say in an S55, where i would just keep 5 gear through the curve and floor it in the straight.
I hope you guys can understand where I'm coming from.
I welcome further discussion into this, if we can keep it to a civilized manner.
The new generation of AMG engines are revolutionary and the best in the FI world
thus far, they have been compared to mainly N/A motors. If the AMG motors were N/A, then yes, they would be quite impressive, but by going the forced induction route, AMG has entered a new league, full of 4 digit horsepower ratings from R34's, Supra's, heck, even BMW made a inline 4 cyclinder turbo that produced 1000+ hp back in the 1980's.
with that being said, i still believe that BMW builds the best production engines in the world, followed closely by Honda.
thus far, they have been compared to mainly N/A motors. If the AMG motors were N/A, then yes, they would be quite impressive, but by going the forced induction route, AMG has entered a new league, full of 4 digit horsepower ratings from R34's, Supra's, heck, even BMW made a inline 4 cyclinder turbo that produced 1000+ hp back in the 1980's.
with that being said, i still believe that BMW builds the best production engines in the world, followed closely by Honda.
Yes bmw are awesome cars....BUT.... TOO BAD THEY ARE FREAKING UGLY!!!
and now its time to LEAVE THIS BOARD YOUU DAMN TROLL!
Besides, isn't that the whole point of a forum? To discuss?
And yes, this is a Mercedes board, which is why i havent posted my comparison between the M3 and the S2000. I came here to discuss and learn more about mercedes cars. What better resource to learn from than the owners themselves?
Last edited by makken; Jun 28, 2004 at 10:19 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
and now its time to LEAVE THIS BOARD YOUU DAMN TROLL!

The 5 has problems, although to a lesser degree. The 6 has some beauty in it, but can definately use some touchup.
Mercedes definately has the "graceful" lines down, but they seem to lack a certain passion. I'll see a benz on the road, and admire it's streamline beauty, how everything flows together, but beyond that, they don't seem to stir much emotion. They lack aggressiveness.
The 5 has problems, although to a lesser degree. The 6 has some beauty in it, but can definately use some touchup.
Mercedes definately has the "graceful" lines down, but they seem to lack a certain passion. I'll see a benz on the road, and admire it's streamline beauty, how everything flows together, but beyond that, they don't seem to stir much emotion. They lack aggressiveness.
DUDE Benzes are elegant cars, who said they should be agressive? I think there's enogh agressive bimmers and civics for that purpose, And about 5 series it's ugly inside outside, OUtsie kinda grows on me, but inside is too ugly.... i agree it drives and corners better then benz, but as someone said when the last time you pushed your car to the limits of admiring their cornering ability or other aspects of a car when you drive to the work and back?
anyway YOU cannot compare benz to bmw they follow different purposes!
won't you agree mr.smart ***?
Last edited by BoBcanada; Jun 28, 2004 at 10:26 AM.
anyway YOU cannot compare benz to bmw they follow different purposes!
won't you agree mr.smart ***?

The front does grow on me, but i can never get used to the back. I actually like the interior overall. the center and steering wheel needs to be replaced, but everything else seems fine. I definately love how smooth the throws were on the six speed (sat in one in the BMW dealership waiting for the parts department to open one day).
You don't have to be at the absolute limits to love the corning ability of a car, and besides, how often do you push that 5.5L V8 to the limits during everyday driving?
You don't have to be at the absolute limits to love the corning ability of a car, and besides, how often do you push that 5.5L V8 to the limits during everyday driving?
so?




They're not very well suited towards my style of driving. I derive a lot more fun from cars when the engine is the limiting factor, not the suspension, the tires, or the brakes. --yes, i admit, i'm a huge honda s2000 fan :p
I live pretty much at the base of a mountain range (about an hour away from lake tahoe/reno) and to me, driving around in there would seem a lot more fun in a honda s2k, where i would downshift to enter a uphill curve, hitting redline just a bit after the apex, and pulling into the next gear for the upcoming straight, instead of say in an S55, where i would just keep 5 gear through the curve and floor it in the straight.
I hope you guys can understand where I'm coming from.
I welcome further discussion into this, if we can keep it to a civilized manner.
Exactly what CAR magazine said in the PCOTY shootout last time I read it a while back. Thing is though some people love the "in your face power" and that's what sells because that's what feels good. Most of the guys who buys M5's and E55's aren't going to take it to the track and go down to the twisties because they'd probably have some sort of Porsche or Ferrari or other *real* track car to do that. They buy the sedans because it has mad power and it's instant. I love the S2000, but I hated how I had to wait for all the power to spool up

I also question some of their logic in some AMG models, eg:
S55 AMG: last thing i need is a 60 year old rear ending me in one of these because he sneezed.
ML55 AMG: ... wtf were they thinking. you're gonna drag race an SUV now...? ummm great.
SL55 AMG: that much power in a 4500ish pound car... you know something's definately wrong when the tires limit your top speed.
Well the S55 is the hot rod of the family. Everyone who's a car enthusiast that's over the hill and can afford it needs one of these. Who said your wife couldn't look hot while driving
ML55 and G55.. okay I agree. Who goes around picking on other X5 4.6/4.8's 
SL55 is beautiful. Theres nothing wrong when tires limit your top speed, unless its the tires themselves! Remember, it did get a quicker time on the ring when compared to the Z8.
To me, it seems that Benz is just building these models for the sake of saying "we have the most powerful x car on the market" instead of actually building a beautifully balanced performance car, which is what i think the big 3 (Mercedes AMG, BMW M, Audi S) are suppose to do.
I'm going to have to agree with you here to an extent. It's always about being able to say "we have the most powerful x car on the market" otherwise what's the point? No one wants to drive a car that's slower then it's predesecor (sp?) or competitor.
All three seems to have lost sight of what they're suppose to do, but I believe Mercedes has really lost it. BMW seems to be at least ahereing to tradition. I appuld them for not building an M7 or an X5 M, as those two models do not deserve a motorsport badge.
Umm.. The X5 4.6/4.8's were pretty much as close to MSport as you could get.
Don't get me wrong, I believe the E55, the CLK55, the SLK32, and the C32 to be great cars. My quarrel is not specfically aimed at them, it's at AMG overall. They are the models that i believe truly deserve the AMG badge. I would definately love to own one of these, but would I BUY it if I had the chance?
probably not.
Yeah, I'm broke too.
:pThey're not very well suited towards my style of driving. I derive a lot more fun from cars when the engine is the limiting factor, not the suspension, the tires, or the brakes. --yes, i admit, i'm a huge honda s2000 fan :p
I think a lot of us here are S2000 fans, great little cars that are the closest things to sportbikes on four wheels!
I live pretty much at the base of a mountain range (about an hour away from lake tahoe/reno) and to me, driving around in there would seem a lot more fun in a honda s2k, where i would downshift to enter a uphill curve, hitting redline just a bit after the apex, and pulling into the next gear for the upcoming straight, instead of say in an S55, where i would just keep 5 gear through the curve and floor it in the straight.
I envy you.
I hope you guys can understand where I'm coming from.
I welcome further discussion into this, if we can keep it to a civilized manner.
Sure, I'll keep it up. The question is, can the rest of us?

SL55 is beautiful. Theres nothing wrong when tires limit your top speed, unless its the tires themselves! Remember, it did get a quicker time on the ring when compared to the Z8.
Yes, the X5 4.8is/4.6is is basically an M X5, but the point is that they didn't put the M badge on it. They didn't degrade the M brand by having an SUV in its line. It's kind of like porsche releasing an SUV (blah they did). Many of us dont' look at porsche the same way again after the release of the cyannane. I believe Mercedes should have just named their AMG SUV's ML550 or G550, instead of adding an AMG tag to the end.
The SL55 is beautiful to look at, but every time i see it, I can't help but wish it was 1000 pounds lighter. I would love to see an SL55 own a 360 Modena around a track. With the SL55, i just see the potiential for so much more IF the car was lighter, IF it didn't have that hardtop, IF it had a 6spd tranny, etc. And that really hurts. I look at the 360 or the Z8, and yes, i do see potiential for a little more, but no where near the extent of the SL55.
ps. I want to see an SL55 AMG CSL =)
I would be much more impressed if someone said "my car can lap nurburgring in under 8 minutes" than if someone said "my car produces 600 horsepower"
case in point: a lotus elise produces *only* 200ish horspower, yet they consistantly own cars in almost all performance catorgies with two times the power.




sometimes i also wait for a sharp bend to come up so he hit the brakes a bit, i would swing into the inside lane and pass him that way.
but yes, on open roads, the passing ability of the AMGs are unsurpassed :p
however, when i do feel the need to pass, i'm often times not offered an open road (i pass because there are slow cars blocking my way, not because i have an open road)
Now a Mercedes AMG, just the presence, the comfort, power, etc. appeals to many also.
Besides, isn't that the whole point of a forum? To discuss?
And yes, this is a Mercedes board, which is why i havent posted my comparison between the M3 and the S2000. I came here to discuss and learn more about mercedes cars. What better resource to learn from than the owners themselves?

Anyway, this board was designed for owners not mag readers - got lost or something?



Your apology.