W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E55 or S55?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-16-2004, 08:22 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Max (SD)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996 Turbo, ML320
E55 or S55?

How do they compare, what are the characteristics of both? Does the E completely outperform the S? Comfort? Performance?

I am 6' 3" 230lbs, will the back seat be usable in the E compared to the S?
Old 09-16-2004, 08:30 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBE55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'03 Yukon XL Denali, '06 Eclipse GS
The E outperforms the S only slightly. Not sure if your body will be suited comfortably on that back of the E, but surely the S. I'm not sure about the technical aspects of performance and comfort between the two, but obviously both are loaded with power along with luxury. What more can you ask for in sporty sedans?
Old 09-16-2004, 08:58 PM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Max (SD)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996 Turbo, ML320
Back seat

You may have misunderstood regarding the back seat. I am certainly not going to be driven around. I meant being tall I push the seat all the way back. How will the rear passenger sit with the front seats pushed back in the E? Does it give them much room?
Old 09-16-2004, 09:08 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
dgussin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 533
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 GLC300 sport
Originally Posted by Max (SD)
You may have misunderstood regarding the back seat. I am certainly not going to be driven around. I meant being tall I push the seat all the way back. How will the rear passenger sit with the front seats pushed back in the E? Does it give them much room?
My buddy is 6'4 310lb college football player, and he fits perfectly in the E55 and doesn't even need the seat all the way back...there is plenty of room in the back of it...of course the S55 is gonna be larger, and if you are gonna get the S, go with the 600.
Old 09-16-2004, 09:40 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MBE55AMG
The E outperforms the S only slightly.
Not even close to being correct.
I spent an 8 hour day this summer at the AMG Challenge running each of the AMG's to their maximum capacities...slalom, drag, spin-out, track runs, etc.
The S55, while a remarkably well engineered car (that is, remarkable that the AMG sedan, as large and heavy as it is, can be tossed around at all and maintain its composure is impressive) was very obviously inferior to the E55 in every performance test.
If you need the space, the S55 is a great road car with some nice performance capabilities for a car its size.
If you're looking for the most athletic of the AMG sedans, it's the E55.
The majority of the professional drivers I spoke with that day preferred the E55 to every other AMG on the track, even the SL55 and CL55.
Old 09-16-2004, 10:14 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
60 > then S
60 < then E

Any Questions?
Old 09-16-2004, 10:22 PM
  #7  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Max (SD)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996 Turbo, ML320
Amg55

How does one go to the AMG challenge. That is probably what I need to do prior to making a decision. I have been finding that I am taking more out of town clients around. I want to make sure that they fit comfortably in the back seat but not give up the performance objective of the car. Note; this would be a replacement to my 996 turbo. I don't want to lose the thrill of the drive when I am on my own.
Old 09-16-2004, 10:45 PM
  #8  
Member
 
M6toE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: vienna
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 E55 & 1988 BMW M6
I'm 6-2, 225 - there's plenty of room left behind my seat. I frequently have three other passengers in my car (albeit a w210). Absolutely no complaints from them - even the larger folks...

The S is nice and spacious, but not the same "athletic" feel as the E...

Also - I think the AMG challenge is a $1,000 ticket. Seems like it would be a nice "client event" but certainly hasn't rated high on my list of things to spend my own $$ on...
Old 09-17-2004, 01:25 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
W210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
The S55 is roomier but I like the trim and finishing in the E55 better. Don't forget new S will be out next year.
Old 09-17-2004, 01:38 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMG99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
Posts: 3,445
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1951 Caterpiller D6
I've been comparing the E and S bodies side by side all day today. I'm 6'03" and find that the rear seat leg room is barely acceptable for an average adult if you want to keep the seatbacks clean. Both are beautiful but if you want to impress your rear seat passengers, go for the S. The E55 is a better car in all performance categories than the S55. However, the S600 (with a few minor tweeks) can make your 996TT look like grandma's Buick at the stoplight drags.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E55 or S55?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.