2012 E63 AMG Dyno Run Results with Video
02-20-2012, 07:29 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E63 AMG
2012 E63 AMG Dyno Run Results with Video
Hi all,
So I finally had some free time to go take my car over to a Dyno and have it tested.
Here are the results.
Car was in Dyno mode (special option in HUD menu that truely turns off all traction controls)
Car was in 4th gear.
I am posting this video because it was humerous to see the first run over torque the dyno wheel, you can see it if you watch closely on the first pull
Here is a youtube video of the actual Pull taking place. Its was nice to hear my exhaust from the outside of the car
http://youtu.be/9tj14OzZhss
Thanks,
Russell
So I finally had some free time to go take my car over to a Dyno and have it tested.
Here are the results.
Car was in Dyno mode (special option in HUD menu that truely turns off all traction controls)
Car was in 4th gear.
I am posting this video because it was humerous to see the first run over torque the dyno wheel, you can see it if you watch closely on the first pull
Here is a youtube video of the actual Pull taking place. Its was nice to hear my exhaust from the outside of the car
http://youtu.be/9tj14OzZhss
Thanks,
Russell
Last edited by russellm; 02-21-2012 at 12:01 AM.
02-20-2012, 08:26 PM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Awesome numbers thanks for posting video!! 
Does your have performance package?
Does your have performance package?
Trending Topics
@ Redline get that looked @ ASAP..
02-21-2012, 09:44 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E63 AMG
I know nothing about Air/Fuel ratios but what I read related to it is:
It's measured at the tail pipe (mine was), isnt it actually running richer than the graph shows. reading another thread, there was mention that the CAT leans the reading out by .5.
It also seems like people target in the mid 12's?
P.S. Stock yes... But with the Performance Package. Its quite possible they are tuning it leaner as part of the PP option (in addition to increasing boost) to get the extra HP gains.
It's measured at the tail pipe (mine was), isnt it actually running richer than the graph shows. reading another thread, there was mention that the CAT leans the reading out by .5.
It also seems like people target in the mid 12's?
P.S. Stock yes... But with the Performance Package. Its quite possible they are tuning it leaner as part of the PP option (in addition to increasing boost) to get the extra HP gains.
Last edited by russellm; 02-22-2012 at 12:15 PM.
02-22-2012, 05:09 AM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
I know nothing about Air/Fuel ratios but what I read related to it is:
It's measured at the tail pipe (mine was), isnt it actually running richer than the graph shows. reading another thread, there was mention that the CAT leans the reading out by .5.
It also seems like people target in the mid 12's?
P.S. Stock yes... But with the Performance Package. Its quick possible they are tuning it leaner as part of the PP option (in addition to increasing boost) to get the extra HP gains.
It's measured at the tail pipe (mine was), isnt it actually running richer than the graph shows. reading another thread, there was mention that the CAT leans the reading out by .5.
It also seems like people target in the mid 12's?
P.S. Stock yes... But with the Performance Package. Its quick possible they are tuning it leaner as part of the PP option (in addition to increasing boost) to get the extra HP gains.
Enjoy your car man!
02-24-2012, 02:45 PM
#14
Newbie
Yeah I saw you there at PSI on monday. I was the owner of the black E55. I had new HRE's put on, and when I walked outside to check out how the car looked I saw yours out there and immediately thought "of course, someone had to one-up me haha". Loved the look of your car though man, so clean. Impressive numbers as well, congrats!
02-24-2012, 03:12 PM
#17
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E63 AMG
Yeah I saw you there at PSI on monday. I was the owner of the black E55. I had new HRE's put on, and when I walked outside to check out how the car looked I saw yours out there and immediately thought "of course, someone had to one-up me haha". Loved the look of your car though man, so clean. Impressive numbers as well, congrats!
I want to get my stock 10 spokes painted black soon
02-27-2012, 03:40 PM
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
INCREDIBLE PULL!!! Thanks for sharing that.
Way to represent the E's!!!
Been the CLS show for the past few months (new CLS TTs)
02-28-2012, 12:39 PM
#21
Senior Member
Obscene numbers for a stock car!
However, do keep in mind that DynoJet numbers are 12% optomistic compared to other Dynos.
Those stock turbos appear to be undersized with so much torque down low.
With a turbo swap that torque woud be even higher at higher RPM, but then there would be lag to deal with.
However, do keep in mind that DynoJet numbers are 12% optomistic compared to other Dynos.
Those stock turbos appear to be undersized with so much torque down low.
With a turbo swap that torque woud be even higher at higher RPM, but then there would be lag to deal with.
Last edited by lunarx; 02-28-2012 at 12:43 PM.
02-28-2012, 12:58 PM
#22
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 795 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Obscene numbers for a stock car!
However, do keep in mind that DynoJet numbers are 12% optomistic compared to other Dynos.
Those stock turbos appear to be undersized with so much torque down low.
With a turbo swap that torque woud be even higher at higher RPM, but then there would be lag to deal with.
However, do keep in mind that DynoJet numbers are 12% optomistic compared to other Dynos.
Those stock turbos appear to be undersized with so much torque down low.
With a turbo swap that torque woud be even higher at higher RPM, but then there would be lag to deal with.
02-28-2012, 07:39 PM
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Problem is majority of people hate REAL numbers & want inflated
bragging rights, so Dyno shops often cater to these needs (to sell more Dyno time) & set DynoDynamics/Mustang/SuperFlow -"Load-Bearing dynos" to read like "DynoJets-Inertia-Dyno's" or slightly higher & also set a lot of DynoJets to read still higher (you have to do your own research on the Shops you use & learn how to properly read Dynos & know inherent differences between them all) Taken me years
& as you & most knowledgeable members here know the 1/4 mile Track is the the ONLY true litmus test of a cars "Real World Performance" Dyno machines should ALL just be used as they were intended "Tuning-Tools" to show Gains & Losses between modifications..
Posting a Baseline UN-Corrected single Dyno run doesn't validate any True performance, it just gives the OP a Baseline to measure future Gains when adding mods etc..
Last edited by Thericker; 02-28-2012 at 07:44 PM.
02-29-2012, 11:30 AM
#25
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E63 AMG
[QUOTE=Thericker;5078274
Posting a Baseline UN-Corrected single Dyno run doesn't validate any True performance, it just gives the OP a Baseline to measure future Gains when adding mods etc..[/QUOTE]
Just to be clear, it was not a single dyno run. It was 4 pulls and the numbers were consistent across the pulls. I only posted one of the pulls and a video.
I mainly had it put on the Dyno just for the fun of it. I am not stupid enough to think this tells some story that my car is better or worse than anyone else's stock 2012 E63. I mainly posted it on here as a historical record because if enough people do it over time, you start to get a database of numbers which can help others someday, which is just a way of trying to contribute to the forum. I also do understand that no all Dyno's are created equal...
However, stating that the 1/4 is the true test of a cars performance is also not the whole story.... air temp, tires used, altitude, skill of the driver all come into play on QTR mile times. So those have to be taken with a grain of salt too
Thanks
Russell
Posting a Baseline UN-Corrected single Dyno run doesn't validate any True performance, it just gives the OP a Baseline to measure future Gains when adding mods etc..[/QUOTE]
Just to be clear, it was not a single dyno run. It was 4 pulls and the numbers were consistent across the pulls. I only posted one of the pulls and a video.
I mainly had it put on the Dyno just for the fun of it. I am not stupid enough to think this tells some story that my car is better or worse than anyone else's stock 2012 E63. I mainly posted it on here as a historical record because if enough people do it over time, you start to get a database of numbers which can help others someday, which is just a way of trying to contribute to the forum. I also do understand that no all Dyno's are created equal...
However, stating that the 1/4 is the true test of a cars performance is also not the whole story.... air temp, tires used, altitude, skill of the driver all come into play on QTR mile times. So those have to be taken with a grain of salt too
Thanks
Russell
