E63 AMG BiTurbo Crushes the 1/4 Mile
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
it'll smoke your M5 , CLS , E from 60 roll bad .
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
I'm guessing you will need drag radials or R888 on the car all the time to handle such power on the streets.
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 773
Likes: 44
C300
It's not finally , I had a few nice fast cars , MB their biggest fail .
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
I don't mind the conversations about rwd vs awd, I've learned a lot from everyone
cheers amg63- and happy new year bro
cheers amg63- and happy new year bro
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
Happy New Years to you and your family, my best wishes to you all.
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 3,228
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ECU dyno tune; EDOK TCU tune; BB intakes; sprintbooster
thank you bro, I always enjoy your posts, happy New Years to you and yours and be safe!
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 663
Likes: 49
From: Bucks Cty, PA
2015 gl450
it'll smoke your M5 , CLS , E from 60 roll bad .
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
Who you dealing with for mods/tuning?
Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 75
Likes: 20
E63s
Why does it matter if we race 100 times and i win 100 out of 100. It doesnt!!!!!
You are just over analyzing this. go sit in the corner.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 19
From: Australia
2014 CLS63 S
Do you think its enough of a difference to make it .5-.8S faster from 100km-200km/k or trap any higher in the 1/4 mile?
Also, wouldn't the lighter weight of the E63 be a greater benefit at higher speed than less frontal area?
I read its something like 200 lbs. lighter, that's ALOT.
Also, wouldn't the lighter weight of the E63 be a greater benefit at higher speed than less frontal area?
I read its something like 200 lbs. lighter, that's ALOT.
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
Last edited by Pumpkinate; Jan 1, 2017 at 05:38 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
Actually, I am thinking it could make the difference. Consider this:
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
Do you know the weight difference?
i thought the weight difference was significant, and that the E having that would offset the CLS drag advanage.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 207
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Actually, I am thinking it could make the difference. Consider this:
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 19
From: Australia
2014 CLS63 S
It may have a small advantage in drag coefficient but that doesn't prove it has less drag. Drag force is proportional to both drag coefficient and frontal area. The CLS appears to have less frontal area...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 40
CLS63 AMG
what about the weight difference. Doesn't that also play a big role?
