E63 AWD vs cls63 RWD roll race
it also makes sense if 4matic has less moving parts than Quattro that it should be more efficient it's simple.
"www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7Q-KIKPrgA"
I have a Torsen in the rear of my Rx7, and a few trips to the local road course would turn the synth diff oil black from the heat ... but that's from a lot of cornering with a lot of throttle.
Last edited by kevink2; Dec 25, 2016 at 11:37 PM.
"www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7Q-KIKPrgA"
I have a Torsen in the rear of my Rx7, and a few trips to the local road course would turn the synth diff oil black from the heat ... but that's from a lot of cornering with a lot of throttle.
I was answering this reply by gaspam, to my post 41, about whether he thought the E63 AMG 4MATIC had a center diff .
The point of my prior reply should not be lost here. The RS7 QUATTRO awd center diff is NOT a Torsen, it is actually very similar to the E63 4MATIC AMG center diff (perhaps the design patent ran out). So there is little difference in losses there, comparing the two.
BTW, the Torsen does have many parts (actually gears), but it is the high friction (by design) when active that creates relatively high losses in the form of heat
.
Last edited by kevink2; Dec 26, 2016 at 11:56 AM.
I was answering this reply by gaspam, to my post 41, about whether he thought the E63 AMG 4MATIC had a center diff .
I knew the Mercedes had a center diff, but in a pm, you did not believe me based on this quote from gaspam " its doesnt have a center diff ..." which was taken out of context. I hope it is clear now.
It seems like in the reply above you were saying the Quattro system in the rs7 is a very similar design to the 4matic system in the E63. I'm curious to know what it is that makes them so similar?
it seems as of now that the open diff setup on 4matic is at least one difference it has that makes it a more efficient AWD system than the Quattro found in the RS7 as gaspam meant to say earlier. Not sure what other differences they have and would be interesting to get more info on this.
Last edited by kevink2; Dec 26, 2016 at 12:06 PM.
Well then I'm sure they must have some differences we just don't know about right now.
The RS7 with equal modding does show itself to be slower at higher speeds than the E63
perhaps it's not because of the differences in the efficiency of the AWD systems they use, and it's for other reasons.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_09y...ature=youtu.be
So the video showed a PP rwd vs Non-S AWD. With AWD being same torque level with S it's likely it would never get caught by the RWD from a dig.
So the video showed a PP rwd vs Non-S AWD. With AWD being same torque level with S it's likely it would never get caught by the RWD from a dig.
I wonder how many people would not buy the E63 if the only option available was the E63S, so essentially what percentage of overall E63 buyers would not buy the car if they have the spring for a little more car and could only choose the S.
With that logic - an RS7 with similar mods should pull the E63... considering the torque split can be switched to a more RWD-bias.....
Makes sense to me.


