TTE1050 or Pure 1000?
09-20-2020, 12:00 AM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
TTE1050 or Pure 1000?
Pure 1000 looks like not such a good choice. Some guy in Canada is running them, glazed his clutches in 2 weeks and runs 10.2s
Meanwhile, we've got a guy with stock turbos running 10.4s...
So... can somebody tell if this dyno graph demonstrates equivalent turbo lag?
https://tteglobal.com/amg/e-class/am...g-4.0-e63/e63s
only turbo offerings I know of that matter are Pure 900, Pure 1000 (laggy), TT1050 (unknown?), and $10k Weistec W4 turbos which just isn't competitive in that $3.5k range.
Oh, and Yabeelas which are a joke/low quality/made from some random company in the middle east. They are originally made for the C63S manifold, not the E63S manifold despite the company lying and swearing they work for E63s. They do, after they made poor Mopes their test/guinea pig/*****.
Meanwhile, we've got a guy with stock turbos running 10.4s...
So... can somebody tell if this dyno graph demonstrates equivalent turbo lag?
https://tteglobal.com/amg/e-class/am...g-4.0-e63/e63s
only turbo offerings I know of that matter are Pure 900, Pure 1000 (laggy), TT1050 (unknown?), and $10k Weistec W4 turbos which just isn't competitive in that $3.5k range.
Oh, and Yabeelas which are a joke/low quality/made from some random company in the middle east. They are originally made for the C63S manifold, not the E63S manifold despite the company lying and swearing they work for E63s. They do, after they made poor Mopes their test/guinea pig/*****.
