Tire rankings - What's best performance, value
Wondering if most folks get the Road Hazard coverage or not.....I've gotten it in the past but not sure it's worth it especially if you buy the tires online, you have to pay for shipping of the defective tire back to the vendor for evaluation and then possible credit to your credit card if they agree it's covered. I did use the Road Hazard twice on my wife's Volvo and got about half the cost of a new tire from the local Goodyear Store.......that was convenient but the tires were bought at the Goodyear Store not online.
Wondering if most folks get the Road Hazard coverage or not.....I've gotten it in the past but not sure it's worth it especially if you buy the tires online, you have to pay for shipping of the defective tire back to the vendor for evaluation and then possible credit to your credit card if they agree it's covered. I did use the Road Hazard twice on my wife's Volvo and got about half the cost of a new tire from the local Goodyear Store.......that was convenient but the tires were bought at the Goodyear Store not online.
Just priced the Sumis in your size and they are $556 for a set not counting shipping and mounting compared to over $1000 for the Turanzas. That's quite a difference.
Here is a link for feeback on people who have put the Sumis on mbs:
http://www.tirerack.com/survey/Surve...irePageLocQty=
I replaced my Goodyear ZR Eagle F1 AS with Michelin PS2s ( E55 staggered set up)- The Michelins are~25% greater cost per tire but the difference is like nite and day with regards road noise, and handling and hopefully treadwear.
The F1s were reasonably quiet when new but after only 10K miles the rears
were nearly down to the wear bars (despite a 400+ tread wear rating) and they became extremely noisy, like I had 4WD truck tires. Worst of all one of my rears exhibited signs of splitting on the sidewall from the tread.
Suck it up and go with the Michelins PS2s - you wont regret it- dont make the same mistake I did (again) by trying to compromise with less expensive tires as it ends up costing more in the long term.
Last edited by enr1co; Apr 11, 2009 at 01:16 PM.
I replaced my Goodyear ZR Eagle F1 AS with Michelin PS2s ( E55 staggered set up)- The Michelins are~25% greater cost per tire but the difference is like nite and day with regards road noise, and handling and hopefully treadwear.
The F1s were reasonably quiet when new but after only 10K miles the rears
were nearly down to the wear bars (despite a 400+ tread wear rating) and they became extremely noisy, like I had 4WD truck tires. Worst of all one of my rears exhibited signs of splitting on the sidewall from the tread.
Suck it up and go with the Michelins PS2s - you wont regret it- dont make the same mistake I did (again) by trying to compromise with less expensive tires as it ends up costing more in the long term.
My experience so far has been very good. I have put the Sumitomo on the fronts, replacing the existing Toyo T1R. I still have Generals on the rear. The Sumitomo traction is way, way better than the General Exclaim USPs that are on the rear. In turns, even with neutral throttle, the rear starts to slide well before the front. Front traction is very good, and grip is very predictable. The tire, when pushed too hard, can easily be felt and begins to scrub very slightly outwards. There is no sharp break, no loud noise, and no drama. The tire is also very comfortable and quiet on the road.
When it comes time to replace the rears, I may debate putting on something with higher traction to control the torque, such as the Falken 615. But at the price and performance of the Sumitomo, I think it will do a good job and will fit the bill.
Last edited by komp55; May 5, 2009 at 03:27 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
For example, here is one (short) review on MBworld:
https://mbworld.org/forums/3447026-post19.html
Here is a sample direct comparison from someone who's used both:
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1009842
He says the HTRZ3 provides "90%" of the performance of the PS2. His main reason for rating the HTRZ3 at only 90% is the PS2 has supperior wet weather performance. If the HTRZ3 is 95% equivalent to a PS2 in the dry and 90% equivalent in the wet, I would consider the two to be "on par" as far as performance.
Have you run both and can directly compare, or do you have a source for your comparison? I see a lot of reviews that say a specific tire is good or bad, but context is what makes that information useful. In particular, I've seen a lot of people say the Vredestein is good, but very little actual comparison. Is it better than a Kumho MX, for example?
One final note, on wet weather performance. If you want to drive fast in the rain, get something like the KDW. It's traction level in the wet is shocking. The tire drives practically the same, regardless of road conditions. But personally, when the roads are wet, I take it easy. I want a tire that can take a turn hard and put down power when it's dry out. When it's wet, I just need something safe, and I'm not looking for "max performance." I find the Falken 615 offers acceptable wet performance, so long as you do your part as the driver. Some disagree. If the PS2 offers better wet traction than the HTRZ3, I say it's largely irrelevant, but a driver who pushes it more in the rain may disagree.
The General UHPs running on our black Sportline for 2 yrs now have plenty of life left and I bought them at the same time I put a set of Pilots on my Sportline. Driving the two, I have no significant preference and the Pilots will need to be replaced sooner.
Picked up a set of Platinum Kumhos this week from Tirerack following the same "objective rating" formula.
Their conclusion is that the PS2 is supreme. If you actually read the results, however, I would say that the Dunlop is a better tire (better than the PS2 in the dry and only marginally lower in the wet) and at a good bit lower price. If you want the best street performance tire (fast in the dry but still plenty safe in the wet), the Dunlop looks like it.
I'm surprised the Falken didn't score better. It's dry performance looks on par with the PS2 (I would think it would beat the PS2 more handily), but it's wet performance is obviously not great (although still better than the Kumho). For the price, it's pretty good.
The new Kumho XS is obviously a beast of a tire, but you give up a lot of wet weather performance. If you are willing to drive like a grandma when it rains, this tire would let you run very hard when it's dry, even more so than the Dunlop, it appears.
The Nitto Invo looks impressive. Very low price, pretty similar dry performance to the PS2 (although the PS2 is slightly better) and the wet performance is still adequate.
Best wet performance (live in Seattle): PS2
Best dry performance (weekend/track car or drive like a Grandma when it rains): Kumho XS
Best daily driver performance (good dry performance, but still ok in wet): Dunlop Star
Best budget tire: Hankook V12 EVO
Does your car require an XL or reinforced tire? If so make sure you factor this into the decision tree.



