Hit the dragway (several runs)
#76
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,983
Received 2,141 Likes
on
1,499 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
#77
Member
#79
Super Member
Thread Starter
Moving to different software. Renntech has been absolutely perfect. No lag when moving from complete stop, no jerkiness, car flies and is a rocket. Just curious to see how a more aggressive tune will do on the street and track. Stay tuned.
#80
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,983
Received 2,141 Likes
on
1,499 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
odd that others with renntech still have a bit of a lag and the jerkiness
#82
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,983
Received 2,141 Likes
on
1,499 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
#83
Super Member
Thread Starter
#84
MBWorld Fanatic!
So far Eurocharged are the only guys I heard of that are saying they can remove TCU torque limits on stock turbos.
I still dont believe it until we see it.
I still dont believe it until we see it.
#85
Super Member
Thread Starter
New software installed. Eurocharged true stage 2 software. Need to get to track and when EC Orlando opens will do the custom thing. Car running great so far.
There are many torque settings in the ECU. Not all tuners address this challenge in the same way....
There are many torque settings in the ECU. Not all tuners address this challenge in the same way....
#86
MBWorld Fanatic!
Does it feel like a big jump in power compared to the stage 1 tune?
#87
Super Member
Thread Starter
Went from another tuner to true stage 2 tune. Yes, feels different and better. However, my butt dyno always says Better. Will see soon on dyno and track soon.
#88
MBWorld Fanatic!
looking forward to see if it really improved over the previous tune. I've heard great things about the EC full tune lately.
#89
Super Member
Thread Starter
Went from renntech full to EC tage two rocker which requires certain hardware mods. Much diff from renntech. Feels very strong, butt my butt dyno sucks. We'll see
#90
MBWorld Fanatic!
The 14+ already have improved on those parts so fresh ones to go along with the tune is what I was told would be it.
Any additional parts they told you about that i wasn't?
#91
Super Member
Thread Starter
[QUOTE=Amg63-;7011064]yea they told me for the rocker file the car just needs new spark plugs and coil packs.
The 14+ already have improved on those parts so fresh ones to go along with the tune is what I was told would be it.
Went with one step colder plugs over stock for 14+
The 14+ already have improved on those parts so fresh ones to go along with the tune is what I was told would be it.
Went with one step colder plugs over stock for 14+
#92
MBWorld Fanatic!
Ok good to know. Looking forward to your results!
#93
MBWorld Fanatic!
[QUOTE=Ralcbah;7011117]
got my stage 2 EC tuned car on the dyno today and this tune made 603whp/730wtq on mine. This is just the tune, upgraded spark plugs, and afe pro dry S filters, no downpipes
definitely some solid numbers considering no downpipes. This tune with downpipes should be at around 630/770.
definitely some solid numbers considering no downpipes. This tune with downpipes should be at around 630/770.
#94
Super Member
Thread Starter
Still can't get below 11.5 ET, but with new tune getting consistent 127mph traps, compared to consistent 124mph traps (with one 126 trap). All with mix of 93 and 100 octane fuel.
Had new motor mounts and trans mounts installed, as mine were shot at 30K miles.
Still working on launching this thing to get my 60 ft down a bit. Haven't been able to find the sweet spot just yet.
There was a beautiful stock c63s sedan that ran 12.0x at 120. Was his first run in the car. Probably into 11s after he ran a couple of times.
Had new motor mounts and trans mounts installed, as mine were shot at 30K miles.
Still working on launching this thing to get my 60 ft down a bit. Haven't been able to find the sweet spot just yet.
There was a beautiful stock c63s sedan that ran 12.0x at 120. Was his first run in the car. Probably into 11s after he ran a couple of times.
Last edited by Ralcbah; 01-28-2017 at 10:06 AM.
#95
Still can't get below 11.5 ET, but with new tune getting consistent 127mph traps, compared to consistent 124mph traps (with one 126 trap). All with mix of 93 and 100 octane fuel.
Had new motor mounts and trans mounts installed, as mine were shot at 30K miles.
Still working on launching this thing to get my 60 ft down a bit. Haven't been able to find the sweet spot just yet.
There was a beautiful stock c63s sedan that ran 12.0x at 120. Was his first run in the car. Probably into 11s after he ran a couple of times.
Had new motor mounts and trans mounts installed, as mine were shot at 30K miles.
Still working on launching this thing to get my 60 ft down a bit. Haven't been able to find the sweet spot just yet.
There was a beautiful stock c63s sedan that ran 12.0x at 120. Was his first run in the car. Probably into 11s after he ran a couple of times.
#96
Super Member
Thread Starter
#97
Still can't get below 11.5 ET, but with new tune getting consistent 127mph traps, compared to consistent 124mph traps (with one 126 trap). All with mix of 93 and 100 octane fuel.
Had new motor mounts and trans mounts installed, as mine were shot at 30K miles.
Still working on launching this thing to get my 60 ft down a bit. Haven't been able to find the sweet spot just yet.
There was a beautiful stock c63s sedan that ran 12.0x at 120. Was his first run in the car. Probably into 11s after he ran a couple of times.
Had new motor mounts and trans mounts installed, as mine were shot at 30K miles.
Still working on launching this thing to get my 60 ft down a bit. Haven't been able to find the sweet spot just yet.
There was a beautiful stock c63s sedan that ran 12.0x at 120. Was his first run in the car. Probably into 11s after he ran a couple of times.
Have you or did you log the car on your runs? Your 60' is pretty bad. If that improved to what these cars do you'd most likely be in the 10s. My car isn't tuned and does pretty consistent 1.80-1.82 just using RS not brake torquing. Check that your DPs are tight that helped a ton bc they started leaking a tiny bit from hitting the cross member. was throwing off Fuel trims
#98
Super Member
Thread Starter
My mounts seem to be bad as well didnt know that was an issue till I started hearing a clunk on gear changes and seeing my Bank 2 DP smashed. Did it help after you replaced them?
Have you or did you log the car on your runs? Your 60' is pretty bad. If that improved to what these cars do you'd most likely be in the 10s. My car isn't tuned and does pretty consistent 1.80-1.82 just using RS not brake torquing. Check that your DPs are tight that helped a ton bc they started leaking a tiny bit from hitting the cross member. was throwing off Fuel trims
Have you or did you log the car on your runs? Your 60' is pretty bad. If that improved to what these cars do you'd most likely be in the 10s. My car isn't tuned and does pretty consistent 1.80-1.82 just using RS not brake torquing. Check that your DPs are tight that helped a ton bc they started leaking a tiny bit from hitting the cross member. was throwing off Fuel trims
I saw the two mounts and the trans mount after pulling them out....They were completely done. Yes, car is much better now. Had the same knock sound as you which is what prompted me to bring it in. One mount was completely busted and void of oil....If held the brake and gave it gas one side of motor would raise up several inches.
Didn't get to log this time...Phone with torque configured was left at home. Will do so next time. Thx again.
#99
Agreed on the 60 ft. Can't get below there for some reason. DPS were removed and tightened for the motor mount swap, but thx for thought; appreciate that.
I saw the two mounts and the trans mount after pulling them out....They were completely done. Yes, car is much better now. Had the same knock sound as you which is what prompted me to bring it in. One mount was completely busted and void of oil....If held the brake and gave it gas one side of motor would raise up several inches.
Didn't get to log this time...Phone with torque configured was left at home. Will do so next time. Thx again.
I saw the two mounts and the trans mount after pulling them out....They were completely done. Yes, car is much better now. Had the same knock sound as you which is what prompted me to bring it in. One mount was completely busted and void of oil....If held the brake and gave it gas one side of motor would raise up several inches.
Didn't get to log this time...Phone with torque configured was left at home. Will do so next time. Thx again.
#100
Super Member
Thread Starter
Absolutely. Under wot, would create same knocking sound and loss of torque as giving significant throttle from a stop. Even starting the car, created some weird movement of the engine which would transfer to the cabin. Much more solid now obviously....Lol.